Dynamic Oscillatory Stretch Technique Versus Static Stretching In Reduced Hamstring Flexibility
NCT ID: NCT03885557
Last Updated: 2019-08-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-03-01
2018-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
"Effects of Passive Static Stretching of 30 Seconds Versus 60 Seconds on the Hamstring Flexibility in Adults With Hamstring Tightness.
NCT06437613
Neurodynamic Sliding Verses Static Stretching
NCT05076825
Comparison of Active Isolated Stretch and Post Isometric Relaxation for Hamstring Flexibility.
NCT04024839
Effects of Lumbosacral Mobility Program on Tight Hamstrings
NCT05393960
Static Versus Dynamic Stretching; Short Term Effects On Physical Performance In Non-Athletes
NCT05053490
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
After the application of hot pack treatment of 7-10 minutes to both groups dynamic oscillatory stretch technique (30 repetitions each of 2 seconds stretch duration in one session) was applied to DOS group and SS stretching (2 repetitions each of 30 seconds in one session) was applied to SS group.
Assessment was done at baseline, immediate post-intervention levels (immediately) and post-intervention level after 1 hour. At baseline and immediately post-intervention level there was no dropout but after 1 hour post-intervention level there were two dropouts from DOS group and 1 dropout from SS group. 40 individuals were analyzed in each DOS and SS group. Data analysis was done through Statistical Package of Social Sciences(SPSS) version 20. Normality of different variables was assessed. Shapiro-Wilk test provided the basis for normality distribution of data.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group I Experimental Dynamic oscillatory stretch(DOS)
Dynamic oscillatory stretch technique (30 repetitions each of 2 seconds stretch duration in one session) was applied to DOS group.
Group I Experimental DOS
After the application of hot pack treatment of 7-10 minutes, dynamic oscillatory stretch(DOS) technique (30 repetitions each of 2 seconds stretch duration in one session) was applied to DOS group. An experienced orthopedic manual physical therapist provided these techniques to patients .
Group II Static Stretching(SS) Group
Static stretching (2 repetitions each of 30 seconds in one session) was applied to SS group.
group II SS group
After the application of hot pack treatment of 7-10 minutes , Static stretching (2 repetitions each of 30 seconds in one session) was applied to SS group. An experienced orthopedic manual physical therapist provided these techniques to patients .
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Group I Experimental DOS
After the application of hot pack treatment of 7-10 minutes, dynamic oscillatory stretch(DOS) technique (30 repetitions each of 2 seconds stretch duration in one session) was applied to DOS group. An experienced orthopedic manual physical therapist provided these techniques to patients .
group II SS group
After the application of hot pack treatment of 7-10 minutes , Static stretching (2 repetitions each of 30 seconds in one session) was applied to SS group. An experienced orthopedic manual physical therapist provided these techniques to patients .
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Active knee extension/90-90 test positive for Screening (With AKE range less than 160 degrees),
* No known history of hip joint or knee joint disease,
* No history of recent hamstring strain.
Exclusion Criteria
* Neurological pathology,
* Patients with some kind of particularly specific pathology (e.g. infection, tumor, osteoporosis, lumbar spine fracture, structural deformity, inflammatory disorder).
20 Years
40 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Riphah International University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Huma Riaz, PHD*
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Riphah International University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sargodha institute of health sciences,DHQ teaching hospital Sargodha
Sargodha, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Castellote-Caballero Y, Valenza MC, Puentedura EJ, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Alburquerque-Sendin F. Immediate Effects of Neurodynamic Sliding versus Muscle Stretching on Hamstring Flexibility in Subjects with Short Hamstring Syndrome. J Sports Med (Hindawi Publ Corp). 2014;2014:127471. doi: 10.1155/2014/127471. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
Youdas JW, Haeflinger KM, Kreun MK, Holloway AM, Kramer CM, Hollman JH. The efficacy of two modified proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching techniques in subjects with reduced hamstring muscle length. Physiother Theory Pract. 2010 May;26(4):240-50. doi: 10.3109/09593980903015292.
Sambandam CE, Alagesan J, Shah S. Immediate Effect of Muscle Energy Technique and Eccentric Training on Hamstring Tightness of Healthy Female Volunteers-A Comparative Study. International journal of current research and review. 2011;3(9):122-26.
Iwasaki R, Yokoyama G, Kawabata S, Suzuki T. Lumbar Extension during Stoop Lifting is Delayed by the Load and Hamstring Tightness. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Jan;26(1):57-61. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.57. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
Houston MN, Hodson VE, Adams KK, Hoch JM. The effectiveness of whole-body-vibration training in improving hamstring flexibility in physically active adults. J Sport Rehabil. 2015 Feb;24(1):77-82. doi: 10.1123/JSR.2013-0059.
Lim KI, Nam HC, Jung KS. Effects on hamstring muscle extensibility, muscle activity, and balance of different stretching techniques. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Feb;26(2):209-13. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.209. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
Michaeli A, Tee JC, Stewart A. DYNAMIC OSCILLATORY STRETCHING EFFICACY ON HAMSTRING EXTENSIBILITY AND STRETCH TOLERANCE: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Jun;12(3):305-313.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RiphahIU Kanza Masood
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.