Effect of Active and Positional Release on Hamstring Flexibility in Athletes
NCT ID: NCT07167602
Last Updated: 2025-09-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
74 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-07-01
2025-08-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This randomized, single-blinded clinical trial enrolled 74 athletes aged 18-35 years with hamstring shortening at the University of Lahore. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either PRT with conventional physiotherapy (hot pack, TENS, stretching, ankle pumps) or ART with the same physiotherapy protocol. Each group received two supervised sessions per week for four weeks.
The primary outcomes were pain (Numeric Pain Rating Scale), range of motion (Popliteal Angle), and functional ability (Lower Extremity Functional Scale). The Active Knee Extension test was used as a secondary outcome.
This study seeks to determine which manual therapy approach provides greater improvements in pain, flexibility, and function, with the goal of guiding evidence-based rehabilitation for athletes.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Neurodynamic Sliding Verses Static Stretching
NCT05076825
"Effects of Passive Static Stretching of 30 Seconds Versus 60 Seconds on the Hamstring Flexibility in Adults With Hamstring Tightness.
NCT06437613
"Comparative Effects of PIR and Static Stretching on Hamstring Flexibility" Post-Isometric Relaxation
NCT07153510
Progressive Eccentric VS Bodyweight Exercises on Agility, Power and Functional Performance in Hamstring Strain.
NCT06131060
Muscle Energy Technique and Hamstring Nordic Lower for Hamstring Tightness in Young Athletes
NCT06012344
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Manual therapy is widely used in clinical practice to manage hamstring-related impairments. Among the commonly applied methods, Active Release Therapy (ART) aims to release adhesions and improve soft tissue mobility through tension and guided movements, while Positional Release Therapy (PRT) works by placing the muscle in a position of comfort to promote relaxation and reduce neuromuscular tension. Although both techniques have shown promise individually, limited evidence exists directly comparing their effectiveness in athletes with hamstring shortening.
This single-site, single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted at the University of Lahore Teaching Hospital to address this gap. Seventy-four athletes between 18 and 35 years of age were recruited using convenience sampling and randomized to one of two groups. Group A received Positional Release Therapy in addition to conventional physiotherapy, while Group B received Active Release Therapy with the same physiotherapy protocol. Conventional care included hot pack application, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, hamstring stretching, and ankle pumps. Both groups received two sessions per week for four weeks, with outcome measures collected at baseline and post-intervention. The primary outcome measures were pain intensity, hamstring flexibility, and lower limb function, assessed respectively using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Popliteal Angle test, and Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). The Active Knee Extension (AKE) test was included as a secondary outcome. The study design incorporated allocation concealment with sealed envelopes, blinding of assessors, and standardized protocols to minimize bias.
By directly comparing PRT and ART, this trial aims to provide evidence to guide clinical decision-making for the management of hamstring shortening in athletes. The results may inform physiotherapists, sports medicine professionals, and rehabilitation specialists about the relative benefits of each technique and support the use of effective, evidence-based interventions to improve pain, flexibility, and function in athletic populations.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Positional Release Therapy plus Conventional Physiotherapy
Participants in this group first received conventional physiotherapy consisting of hot pack application (10 minutes), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (15 minutes), passive hamstring stretching, and ankle pumps. After conventional therapy, Positional Release Therapy (PRT) was administered for the medial and lateral hamstrings. PRT involved positioning the muscle in shortened positions of comfort and applying gentle pressure with specific limb movements to facilitate relaxation, reduce neuromuscular tension, and relieve discomfort. Each session lasted approximately 50 minutes (35 minutes conventional therapy + 15 minutes PRT) and was delivered twice weekly for 4 weeks.
Positional Release Therapy
A manual therapy technique applied to the medial and lateral hamstrings after conventional physiotherapy. In PRT, the affected muscle is placed in a position of maximal comfort and relative shortening, while gentle pressure and controlled joint movements are applied. This position is held for approximately 30 seconds and repeated three times per session. The method aims to decrease neuromuscular tension, reduce pain, and promote muscle relaxation through a reflexive response. Distinct from Active Release Therapy, PRT does not involve active contractions or longitudinal tension but instead relies on positioning and relaxation to achieve therapeutic effects.
Conventional Physiotherapy
Hot pack, TENS, hamstring stretching, ankle pumps (common to both groups).
Active Release Therapy plus Conventional Physiotherapy
Participants in this group also received conventional physiotherapy consisting of hot pack application (10 minutes), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (15 minutes), passive hamstring stretching, and ankle pumps. Following conventional care, Active Release Therapy (ART) was administered. ART involved applying longitudinal tension to the hamstring muscles while guiding the limb through specific ranges of motion, combined with brief isometric contractions of the hamstrings and quadriceps. This technique aimed to release adhesions, restore soft tissue mobility, and improve flexibility. Each session lasted approximately 50 minutes (35 minutes conventional therapy + 15 minutes ART) and was delivered twice weekly for 4 weeks.
Active Release Therapy
A manual therapy technique applied to the hamstrings after conventional physiotherapy. ART combines therapist-applied longitudinal tension with patient movement and brief isometric contractions of both hamstrings and quadriceps. The limb is guided through specific ranges of motion to break down adhesions, restore tissue mobility, and improve flexibility. Unlike Positional Release Therapy, ART is an active technique requiring patient engagement through contractions and controlled movement against resistance, targeting scar tissue and myofascial restrictions.
Conventional Physiotherapy
Hot pack, TENS, hamstring stretching, ankle pumps (common to both groups).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Positional Release Therapy
A manual therapy technique applied to the medial and lateral hamstrings after conventional physiotherapy. In PRT, the affected muscle is placed in a position of maximal comfort and relative shortening, while gentle pressure and controlled joint movements are applied. This position is held for approximately 30 seconds and repeated three times per session. The method aims to decrease neuromuscular tension, reduce pain, and promote muscle relaxation through a reflexive response. Distinct from Active Release Therapy, PRT does not involve active contractions or longitudinal tension but instead relies on positioning and relaxation to achieve therapeutic effects.
Active Release Therapy
A manual therapy technique applied to the hamstrings after conventional physiotherapy. ART combines therapist-applied longitudinal tension with patient movement and brief isometric contractions of both hamstrings and quadriceps. The limb is guided through specific ranges of motion to break down adhesions, restore tissue mobility, and improve flexibility. Unlike Positional Release Therapy, ART is an active technique requiring patient engagement through contractions and controlled movement against resistance, targeting scar tissue and myofascial restrictions.
Conventional Physiotherapy
Hot pack, TENS, hamstring stretching, ankle pumps (common to both groups).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Both genders
* Athletes with BMI between 18.5 kg/m² and 29.9 kg/m².
* Basketball, Football And Badminton Players.
* Athletes who practices atleast 3 days per week.
* Participants with Numeric pain rating scale values \> 4.
* Participants with unilateral tightness of hamstring muscle with SLR \< 80° and AKE \< 125°
Exclusion Criteria
* Participants with leg length discrepancy.
* Participants with a sedentary lifestyle.
* Participants with upper motor neuron or lower motor neuron lesion.
* Participants with any previous history of lower extremity injury in the past three months
* Participants who are not willing to sign the consent
18 Years
35 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Lahore
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Muhammad Asim Arif
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Institute of Physical Therapy, University of Lahore
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Lahore - Teaching Hospital, University Institute of Physical Therapy
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UOL/I/REB/25/09/0060
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.