Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
69 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-09-15
2023-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
For a person to gain an increase in muscle strength mobility training in the form of stretching and flexibility training of our skeletal muscle is a common exercise. However, the evidence are scare and there are only a few studies comparing the effect of prolonged static stretching (\> 90 sec) and dynamic flexibility training as to which of these methods has the best length-enhancing effect over time.
The purpose of this study is to compare the crossover-effect of eight weeks of oneleg dynamic flexibility training versus oneleg prolonged static stretching versus a nonstretching controlgroup on mobility in the hamstring muscles in adults with reduced mobility of the hamstring muscle. The aim is also to compare the sustained effect of flexibility training between the two groups, eight weeks after completion of the intervention.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Flexibility Training Versus Static Stretching on Hamstring Muscle Length and Patterns of Lumbar Flexion
NCT02702219
The Acute Effects of Static and PNF Stretching Exercise With Blood Flow Restriction in Athletes
NCT06656858
Upper Versus Lower Limb Responses to Higher Versus Lower Load Resistance Training in Young Men
NCT03993483
Dynamic Oscillatory Stretch Technique Versus Static Stretching In Reduced Hamstring Flexibility
NCT03885557
Effects of Neurodynamic Sliding Versus Eccentric Training on Lower Extremity Function, Strength and Proprioception in Athletes with Short Hamstring Syndrome.
NCT06748560
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dynamic stretching
Strecthing
Comparing the crossover-effect of dynamic versus static stretching
Static stretching
Strecthing
Comparing the crossover-effect of dynamic versus static stretching
Controll
Strecthing
Comparing the crossover-effect of dynamic versus static stretching
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Strecthing
Comparing the crossover-effect of dynamic versus static stretching
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Read and understand swedish
Exclusion Criteria
* Disabilities within the muscloskeletal system (i.e. lower back, thoracic spine, cervikal spine, hip, knee, ankle, fot) affecting the participants life
* Neurological, inflammatoric or heart-diseases
* Nociplasic pain disorders
* Medication with possibility affecting muscle strength of flexibility
* Positive neurodynamic test of the lower extremity
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Luleå Tekniska Universitet
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Luleå university of Technology
Luleå, Norrbotten County, Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LuleaTU
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.