Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Pain Control During Cervical Dilator Placement Prior to Dilation and Evacuation
NCT ID: NCT03868787
Last Updated: 2023-07-25
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
74 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-05-01
2021-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Paracervical Block for Pain Control With Osmotic Dilator Placement
NCT02354092
Prophylactic Lidocaine Spray for Pain Alleviation in Women Undergoing Osmotic Dilator Insertion for Second Trimester Dilatation and Evacuation
NCT02097017
Self-administered Intravaginal 2% Lidocaine Gel Prior to Intrauterine Device Insertion in Nulliparous Women
NCT01534520
Effect of Paracervical Block Volume on Pain Control for Dilation and Curettage.o
NCT03636451
12 Versus 20 mL PCB for D&E Cervical Prep
NCT03356145
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) has been used in pain relief since 1965, when Melzack and Walls proposed using electrical stimulation as analgesia based on the gate control theory of pain relief. TENS units are small, inexpensive, portable, battery-powered devices which deliver mild, alternating electrical currents via electrodes positioned on the skin near the anticipated dermatomal distribution of pain. The parameters of pulse frequency and pulse intensity are adjustable and linked to TENS efficacy. They overall have a favorable safety profile. Contraindications include electronic implants, such as cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators.
Two main theories have been proposed regarding how TENS provides analgesia. According to the "gate control" theory, neuromodulation may activate large myelinated afferent nerve fibers in the dorsal horn to inhibit transmission in primary afferent nociceptive fibers. The inhibitory input from the large myelinated afferent fibers is thought to be able to "close the gate" to prevent transmission of pain sensation. The endorphin-mediated theory of pain relief states that a stimulus outside the central nervous system can raise the level of endogenous endorphins and therefore provide analgesia.
The proposed study is a single-blinded randomized controlled trial studying use of TENS for pain control during initial dilator insertion prior to dilation and evacuation. The participants will be randomized in a 1:1 randomization scheme using opaque, sequentially numbered envelopes following consent. The experimental group will have an active TENS unit - Chattanooga Primera - and the control group will have a sham TENS unit. The sham TENS will be the same unit without the true TENS electrical connections. The true TENS unit consists of the active unit and electrode pads connected to the unit via direct wires. The sham group will be given the active unit and have electrode pads placed but without wire connections. These participants will be told the device is a wireless device. They will also be told they may or may not feel sensation from the TENS. This will allow the device to be powered on and run in the same manner as the active group, but will not allow for electrical transmission between the unit and electrodes.
Based on power calculations, 56 participants are needed to detect a 20mm difference in VAS score with a standard deviation of 30mm. This is based on both minimum clinically significant difference in pain scores as well as previous studies regarding pain during dilator insertion. We will attempt to recruit 70 patients to account for possible TENS unit misuse or study dropout.
Eligible patients will have two electrodes will be placed in the suprapubic area in the bilateral lower quadrants. The program that will be used is a high frequency (80Hz) program that runs for an hour in duration. It will be initiated 5 minutes prior to speculum placement. Participants will be instructed to increase the amplitude of the current as needed to provide analgesia but avoiding discomfort from the TENS stimulation. All participants will receive a paracervical block of 20mL 1% lidocaine with sodium bicarbonate followed by rigid dilation and dilator placement per standard cervical preparation protocol. Participants will complete 100mm VAS immediately following dilator placement. VAS is a 100mm line on sheet of paper with 0 being no pain and 100mm being worst pain of their life. The number of dilators, type of dilators, and use of adjunctive mifepristone/misoprostol will be according to providers' clinical judgement. Dilator placement will be performed by either Family Planning Fellow, PGY-3 OB/GYN resident, or Nurse Practitioner. All participants will receive prescriptions for twenty tablets of ibuprofen (600mg) and twelve tablets of hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5/325, which is the standard post-dilator insertion pain protocol for this clinic site. Participants will be allowed to leave prior to the end of the initial one-hour program. They will be sent home with instructions of how to run the TENS unit as needed for pain control.
Following the initial hour of use patients can re-activate the TENS unit as often as desired, using the same program. Participants will be given a log to record when TENS unit was used and whether additional pain medications were taken. They will return their completed log and bring pill bottles on the day of surgery to confirm medications used.
Of note, in our practice a second set of cervical dilators is often placed 6 hours after first set in patients over 20 weeks gestation. During this placement the first set is removed, further rigid dilation is performed, and new dilators are placed per standard cervical preparation protocol. Pain score on 100mm VAS will be recorded following this dilator placement as well as a secondary outcome. Participants will run the TENS unit in the same manner as the initial dilator placement for dilator exchange.
On the day of surgery participants will record their highest interval pain score on 100mm VAS. They will also be asked their satisfaction with the TENS device. The TENS unit will be returned on the day of surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Active TENS
The active TENS unit consists of the active unit and electrode pads connected to the unit via direct wires. The program that will be used is a high frequency (80Hz) program that runs for an hour in duration. It will be initiated 5 minutes prior to speculum placement. Participants will be instructed to increase the amplitude of the current as needed to provide analgesia but avoiding discomfort from the TENS stimulation
TENS
TENS units are small, inexpensive, portable, battery-powered devices which deliver mild, alternating electrical currents via electrodes positioned on the skin near the anticipated dermatomal distribution of pain.
Sham TENS
The sham TENS will be the same unit without the true TENS electrical connections. The sham group will be given the active unit and have electrode pads placed but without wire connections. These participants will be told the device is a wireless device. They will also be told they may or may not feel sensation from the TENS. This will allow the device to be powered on and run in the same manner as the active group, but will not allow for electrical transmission between the unit and electrodes
Sham TENS
Non-active TENS unit
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
TENS
TENS units are small, inexpensive, portable, battery-powered devices which deliver mild, alternating electrical currents via electrodes positioned on the skin near the anticipated dermatomal distribution of pain.
Sham TENS
Non-active TENS unit
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Gestational age between 14 weeks and 23 weeks 6 days
3. Willing and able to sign an informed consent in English
4. No contraindications to TENS
Exclusion Criteria
2. Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes or evidence of intra-amniotic infection
3. Presence of implanted cardiac device
4. Lack of sensation to touch on area of electrode placement
5. Prior TENS use
6. Opioid dependence
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Society of Family Planning
OTHER
Ashley Turner, MD
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ashley Turner, MD
Co-investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Leanne McCloskey, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Northwestern University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Northwestern Center for Family Planning and Contraception
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Binder P, Gustafsson A, Uvnas-Moberg K, Nissen E. Hi-TENS combined with PCA-morphine as post caesarean pain relief. Midwifery. 2011 Aug;27(4):547-52. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.05.002. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
De Angelis C, Perrone G, Santoro G, Nofroni I, Zichella L. Suppression of pelvic pain during hysteroscopy with a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation device. Fertil Steril. 2003 Jun;79(6):1422-7. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00363-7.
ELECTROPHYSICAL AGENTS - Contraindications And Precautions: An Evidence-Based Approach To Clinical Decision Making In Physical Therapy. Physiother Can. 2010 Fall;62(5):1-80. doi: 10.3138/ptc.62.5. Epub 2011 Jan 5. No abstract available.
Olsen MF, Elden H, Janson ED, Lilja H, Stener-Victorin E. A comparison of high- versus low-intensity, high-frequency transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation for painful postpartum uterine contractions. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(3):310-4. doi: 10.1080/00016340601040928.
Johnson MI, Paley CA, Howe TE, Sluka KA. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for acute pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 15;2015(6):CD006142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006142.pub3.
Kayman-Kose S, Arioz DT, Toktas H, Koken G, Kanat-Pektas M, Kose M, Yilmazer M. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain control after vaginal delivery and cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Oct;27(15):1572-5. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.870549. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
Mercier RJ, Liberty A. Intrauterine lidocaine for pain control during laminaria insertion: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2014 Dec;90(6):594-600. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
Platon B, Andrell P, Raner C, Rudolph M, Dvoretsky A, Mannheimer C. High-frequency, high-intensity transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation as treatment of pain after surgical abortion. Pain. 2010 Jan;148(1):114-119. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.10.023. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
Proctor ML, Smith CA, Farquhar CM, Stones RW. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and acupuncture for primary dysmenorrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2002(1):CD002123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002123.
Soon R, Tschann M, Salcedo J, Stevens K, Ahn HJ, Kaneshiro B. Paracervical Block for Laminaria Insertion Before Second-Trimester Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;130(2):387-392. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002149.
de Sousa L, Gomes-Sponholz FA, Nakano AM. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the relief of post-partum uterine contraction pain during breast-feeding: a randomized clinical trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 May;40(5):1317-23. doi: 10.1111/jog.12345. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
Vance CG, Dailey DL, Rakel BA, Sluka KA. Using TENS for pain control: the state of the evidence. Pain Manag. 2014 May;4(3):197-209. doi: 10.2217/pmt.14.13.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STU00209157
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.