Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-08-19
2019-09-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
FAUCS Surgery: Learning Curve for Resident
NCT04155177
Laparoscopic Repair of Cesarean Scar Niche
NCT04307524
Insitu Repair Versus Uterine Exeriorization During Cesarean Section
NCT01723605
Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension Versus Modified Burch Colposuspension
NCT05616481
Zip Incision Approximation vs. Suture for C-Section
NCT02915952
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
FAUCS
Patients undergoing a cesarean section using the FAUCS technique
French Abulatory Cesrean Section
A cesarean section performed according to the FAUCS technique
Control
Patients undergoing a cesarean section using the traditional (Misgav-Ladach) technique
Misgav-Ladach
A cesarean section performed according to the Misgav Ladach technique
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
French Abulatory Cesrean Section
A cesarean section performed according to the FAUCS technique
Misgav-Ladach
A cesarean section performed according to the Misgav Ladach technique
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* term pregnancy: 37-42 weeks
* singleton pregnancy
* age 18 and above
* patients capable of signing an informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* emergency cesarean
* previous 3 cesareans and above
* placenta accreta
* uterine myomas in the lower segment
* fetal growth restriction
* fetal anemia
* preeclampsia
* women scheduled for general anesthesia
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bnai Zion Medical Center
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bnai-Zion Medical Center
Haifa, , Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Rami Sammour
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sagi S, Bleicher I, Bakhous R, Pelts A, Talhamy S, Caspin O, Sammour R, Sagi-Dain L. Comparison between the modified French AmbUlatory Cesarean Section and standard cesarean technique-a randomized double-blind controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Jul;5(7):100910. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100910. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FAUCS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.