Trial Comparing Barbed and Non-barbed Suture for Uterine Incision Closure at Cesarean Section
NCT ID: NCT02962011
Last Updated: 2018-06-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
102 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-08-01
2017-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Closing Uterine Incision During C-section Using Barbed Suture (Stratafix) or Vicryl Suture.
NCT03159871
Comparison of Barbed and Conventional Sutures in Adhesion Formation Following Cesarean Section
NCT03183362
Study to Compare Suture Material in Closure of Uterine Incision in Cesarian Section
NCT02517710
Barbed Suture for Hysterotomy Closure During Cesarean Section
NCT04622267
Uterine Closure at C-section by Stratafix Tissue Control Device: Randomized Case-Control Study
NCT02288013
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Knotless barbed suture
Knotless barbed suture
uterine incision closure
polyglactin 910
Vicryl
polyglactin 910
uterine incision closure
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Knotless barbed suture
uterine incision closure
polyglactin 910
uterine incision closure
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* elective repeat cesarean
Exclusion Criteria
* PROM
* chorioamninitis
* placental abruption
* placenta previa or accreta
* known uterine fibroids
* women with known medical problems such as coagulopathy
18 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ziv Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
David Peleg
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Peleg
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ziv Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ziv Medical Center
Safed, , Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Peleg D, Ahmad RS, Warsof SL, Marcus-Braun N, Sciaky-Tamir Y, Ben Shachar I. A randomized clinical trial of knotless barbed suture vs conventional suture for closure of the uterine incision at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;218(3):343.e1-343.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.043. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ZIVH
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.