Feedback to Improve Rational Strategies of Antibiotic Initiation and Duration in Long Term Care
NCT ID: NCT03807466
Last Updated: 2021-08-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
356 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-05-15
2021-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Feedback to Improve Rational Strategies of Antibiotic Initiation and Duration in Long Term Care (FIRST AID -LTC) - Phase 2
NCT04187742
Optimizing Antibiotic Use in Long Term Care
NCT00243360
Adherence to Guidelines for Antibiotic Use in Respiratory Infections at Hospitals
NCT00129883
Improving Antibiotic Use for ARIs in Urgent Care Clinics
NCT06144242
Audit-and-feedback to Improve Antimicrobial-prescribing Among Urologists
NCT04196777
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The overarching goals of FIRST AID - LTC are two-fold:
1. Improve rational antibiotic prescribing by physicians to minimize harms among LTC residents.
2. Advance the science of audit-and-feedback to improve physician prescribing practices.
Specific Aims
To improve rational antibiotic prescribing in LTC:
1. by decreasing unnecessary initiation of antibiotic treatments among Ontario LTC residents, as well as the variability in initiation rates across LTC prescribers.
2. by decreasing unnecessary prolonged duration of antibiotic treatments among Ontario LTC residents, as well as the variability in prolonged duration treatment use across LTC prescribers.
To advance audit-and-feedback implementation science:
1\. by evaluating whether a dynamic audit-and-feedback report highlighting antibiotic prescribing can lead to greater reductions in antibiotic use, than a static paginated report
Anticipated Contributions to Health-Related Knowledge
Although the literature is inundated with trials examining the impact of audit-and-feedback compared to usual care, there is a need for studies to improve audit-and-feedback delivery. FIRST AID-LTC will test optimal delivery and peer comparison techniques for audit-and-feedback. The knowledge learned can be extrapolated to antibiotic interventions in LTC in other provinces across Canada, as well more broadly to inappropriate medication prescribing practices in LTC.
Anticipated Contributions to Health Care, Health Systems and Health Outcomes
FIRST AID-LTC will lead to immediate reductions in excess antibiotic use in Ontario LTC facilities, which in turn should result in substantial reductions in direct drug costs, as well as downstream complications of allergy, organ toxicity, C. difficile infections and antimicrobial resistance. With easy transferability to other Canadian provinces, the improvements in cost-savings and patient outcomes could be massive in scope.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dynamic/Interactive Report
LTC physician receives dynamic/interactive report only
Dynamic/Interactive vs. Static/Paginated Report
Evaluate whether a stand-alone interactive audit-and-feedback report highlighting antibiotic prescribing can lead to greater reductions in antibiotic use, than a report embedded in a broader static feedback system
Static/Paginated Report
LTC physician receives static/paginated report only
No interventions assigned to this group
LTC Physicians Enrolled in Reports
All LTC physicians who receive a dynamic or paginated report
\[note: this is not part of randomization assignment, but a quasi-experimental study\]
LTC Physicians Enrolled vs. Not Enrolled in Reports
Evaluate whether being provided an audit-and-feedback report (regardless of dynamic or static) can lead to greater reductions in antibiotic use, than those who do not receive either report
LTC Physicians Not Enrolled in Reports
All LTC physicians who do not receive a dynamic or paginated report
\[note: this is not part of randomization assignment, but a quasi-experimental study\]
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dynamic/Interactive vs. Static/Paginated Report
Evaluate whether a stand-alone interactive audit-and-feedback report highlighting antibiotic prescribing can lead to greater reductions in antibiotic use, than a report embedded in a broader static feedback system
LTC Physicians Enrolled vs. Not Enrolled in Reports
Evaluate whether being provided an audit-and-feedback report (regardless of dynamic or static) can lead to greater reductions in antibiotic use, than those who do not receive either report
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* a record for a non-emergency long-term care inpatient services OR
* an Ontario Drug Benefits record administered in long-term care
Index date = The analysis will be anchored on the most recent of either of the records above within a given quarter or their date of death (whichever date is earliest)
Exclusion Criteria
* Invalid age (age\<19 or age\>115) at index date
* Missing or invalid sex or date of birth at index date
* Death date is \>7 days before index date
* If the individual does not live in a nursing home or home for the aged
* Cannot be linked to a Most Responsible Physician (MRP) (see methodology below)
To Identify the Most Responsible Physician (MRP) Using Virtual Rostering
For each patient in the above resident cohort, the study team will retrieve all records from health care providers in the 6 month period preceding the index date (180 days), keeping only records from physicians who have a specialty of 1) general practice, 2) community medicine or 3) geriatrics.
Steps for MRP assignment:
Step 1) The study team will first select physicians with the highest count of records for the monthly management of a nursing home or home for the aged. This is completed for as many residents as possible.
Step 2) If there were no monthly management fee records as described above then the physician with highest count of non-emergency long-term care inpatient services records for each patient will be selected. This step is only applied to residents who could not be matched to a physician by Step 1. \*\*Physician must have seen the patient one or more times in 90 days prior to and including index date to be considered MRP. This criteria is applied to ensure the physician has seen the resident within the reporting quarter.
Step 3) Some patients will virtually roster to physicians in Enrollment groups, some will virtually roster to physicians that are not in a group. For these, the study team will recode enrollment program type to 'NOR' (not otherwise rostered) - these are likely fee for service physicians.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
OTHER_GOV
Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion
OTHER_GOV
Health Quality Ontario
OTHER
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nick Daneman
Adjunct Scientist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nick Daneman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
ICES
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
ICES
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Daneman N, Lee SM, Bai H, Bell CM, Bronskill SE, Campitelli MA, Dobell G, Fu L, Garber G, Ivers N, Lam JMC, Langford BJ, Laur C, Morris A, Mulhall C, Pinto R, Saxena FE, Schwartz KL, Brown KA. Population-Wide Peer Comparison Audit and Feedback to Reduce Antibiotic Initiation and Duration in Long-Term Care Facilities with Embedded Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 15;73(6):e1296-e1304. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab256.
Laur C, Sribaskaran T, Simeoni M, Desveaux L, Daneman N, Mulhall C, Lam J, Ivers NM. Improving antibiotic initiation and duration prescribing among nursing home physicians using an audit and feedback intervention: a theory-informed qualitative analysis. BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Feb;10(1):e001088. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001088.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
441-2017
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.