Clinical Outcomes Associated With the Use of ViviGen® for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease
NCT ID: NCT03733626
Last Updated: 2025-06-26
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
46 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-03-19
2024-06-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
An ACDF Multi-Center Study Using ViviGen Cellular Bone Matrix
NCT02814825
Single-Armed Use of ViviGen Cellular Bone Matrix in Patients Undergoing Posterolateral Lumbar Surgery
NCT04007094
Comparison of Radiographic Fusion Rate and Clinical Outcome of ALIF and XLIF Performed With Either Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 or ViviGen®
NCT05238740
rhBMP-2 Versus Vivigen in Lumbar Fusion Procedures
NCT03527966
A Study Evaluating 3-Level OLIF Spine Fusion
NCT03896347
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Subjects will be randomized to either: 1) treatment arm where the investigator will use an FDA approved/cleared DePuy Synthes spinal pedicle screw system with ViviGen® Cellular Bone Matrix mixed with cortical/cancellous allograft or the 2) control arm where the investigator use the same DePuy Synthes spinal pedicle screw system with local autologous bone graft mixed with cortical/cancellous allograft. Both treatment groups represent standard of care lumbar fusion surgeries using two types of bone graft options to create the arthrodesis as comparators.
Once the lumbar fusion surgery has taken place as planned; data will be collected regarding the surgery performed, including operative time, amount of bone graft used, spinal system used, length of hospital stay, and adverse events/complications.
Study subjects will be followed up at 6-weeks, 3-months, 6-months, and 12-months postoperatively at the private practice or clinic. During these routine (standard of care) postoperative visits, subjects will complete questionnaires (VAS, ODI, SF-36, patient satisfaction) and have neurological exam (lumbar spine exam, see appendix 1) completed by the investigator. Adverse events related to device and/or procedure will be evaluated as each postoperative visit. Anteroposterior (AP) and lateral x-rays will be performed at all visits with flexion and extension x-rays added at baseline, 3-months, 6-months, and 12-months. A CT scan of the lumbar spine will be performed during the 12-month postoperative time frame at the Beaumont-Royal Oak Imaging Center. Radiographic analysis will be performed and evaluated for fusion status as evidenced by bony bridging, presence of radiolucency, and development of pseudoarthrosis at each follow-up visit.
This study design reflects the current standard of care for lumbar spinal stenosis, degenerative disc disease and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Lumbar fusion surgery using pedicle screw fixation with autograft and allograft bone grafting options is treatment of choice after conservative (non-surgical) therapies have been implemented and failed.
Addendum:
1. In order to protect the well-being of patients and in compliance with the current state mandated shelter in place order, follow-up visits will be completed via telephone visit by the study coordinator when possible. This includes patient reported outcomes and adverse event reporting. Some parts of the study visit may not be completed over the phone such as lumbar x-rays, neuro exam, and CT scan (at 12-months postop); these missing (or scheduled at a later date) protocol specific items will be noted as a protocol deviation with the reason being due to COVID-19.
2. If a televisit is not possible, the visit may be rescheduled at a later date. Therefore, out of window and missing visits will be recorded as protocol deviations with the reason being due to COVID-19.
3. Subject follow-up visits will be rescheduled in the office once the acute phase of the pandemic has subsided if the study visit is not substantially out of window.
4. Subject enrollment is on hold until the acute phase of the pandemic has subsided but screening will continue.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ViviGen® Cellular Bone Matrix with DePuy Synthes Spinal Pedicle Screw System
20 subjects undergoing one or two-level instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion surgery using ViviGen Cellular Bone Matrix mixed with cortical/cancellous allograft and DePuy Synthes pedicle screw system
ViviGen® Cellular Bone Matrix with DePuy Synthes Spinal Pedicle screw system
ViviGen® is manufactured by LifeNet Health. ViviGen® Cellular Bone Matrix is a formulation of cryopreserved viable cortical cancellous bone matrix and demineralized bone. ViviGen is a Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-based Product (HCT/P) as defined by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 21 CFR 1271.10 and will be used with the FDA approved DePuy Synthes Spinal pedicle screw system for fusion.
Local Bone Autograft with DePuy Synthes Spinal Pedicle Screw System
20 subjects undergoing open, one or two-level posterolateral lumbar fusion surgery using local autograft mixed with cortical/cancellous allograft and DePuy Synthes pedicle screw system.
Local Bone Autologous Bone Graft with DePuy Synthes Spinal pedicle screw system
Patient's own bone harvested during spinal surgery will be used with the FDA approved DePuy Synthes spinal pedicle screw system to create the fusion.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ViviGen® Cellular Bone Matrix with DePuy Synthes Spinal Pedicle screw system
ViviGen® is manufactured by LifeNet Health. ViviGen® Cellular Bone Matrix is a formulation of cryopreserved viable cortical cancellous bone matrix and demineralized bone. ViviGen is a Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-based Product (HCT/P) as defined by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 21 CFR 1271.10 and will be used with the FDA approved DePuy Synthes Spinal pedicle screw system for fusion.
Local Bone Autologous Bone Graft with DePuy Synthes Spinal pedicle screw system
Patient's own bone harvested during spinal surgery will be used with the FDA approved DePuy Synthes spinal pedicle screw system to create the fusion.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Able to provide consent
3. Is undergoing standard of care one or two-level instrumented posterolateral fusion at the level between L1-S1
4. Has diagnosis of spinal stenosis, degenerative disc disease and/or up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis
5. Requires decompression at intended fusion level (multi-level decompression allowed L1-S1)
6. Has failed 6-weeks or more of conservative, non-operative treatment
7. Has back and/or radicular lumbar symptoms with ODI score of ≥ 30 preoperatively.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Requires fusion of more than two levels
3. Requires an interbody fusion based on relevant diagnoses and factors (such as foraminal stenosis, degree of spondylolisthesis, spinal deformity, disc space collapse, and subject's age) as determined by investigator
4. BMI \> 40
5. Active systemic infection or infection at operative site
6. History of an osteoporotic fracture and/or vertebral body fracture
7. Is currently being treated with chemotherapy, radiation, immunosuppression or chronic steroid therapy
8. History of osteoporosis, osteopenia, or osteomalacia that would contraindicate spinal surgery
9. Psychological or physical condition in the opinion of the investigator that would interfere with subject self-assessments
10. History of neurological condition in the opinion of the investigator that may affect lumbar function and pain assessments
11. Subjects with a history of cancer must be disease free for at least 3 years
12. Pregnant, or plans on becoming pregnant
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
DePuy Synthes
INDUSTRY
William Beaumont Hospitals
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jad Khalil MD
Staff physician and Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jad G Khalil, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
William Beaumont Hospitals
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
William Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Boden SD. Overview of the biology of lumbar spine fusion and principles for selecting a bone graft substitute. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Aug 15;27(16 Suppl 1):S26-31. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200208151-00007.
Kim DH, Rhim R, Li L, Martha J, Swaim BH, Banco RJ, Jenis LG, Tromanhauser SG. Prospective study of iliac crest bone graft harvest site pain and morbidity. Spine J. 2009 Nov;9(11):886-92. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.05.006. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
Betz RR. Limitations of autograft and allograft: new synthetic solutions. Orthopedics. 2002 May;25(5 Suppl):s561-70. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-20020502-04.
Gazdag AR, Lane JM, Glaser D, Forster RA. Alternatives to Autogenous Bone Graft: Efficacy and Indications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1995 Jan;3(1):1-8. doi: 10.5435/00124635-199501000-00001.
DeCoster TA, Gehlert RJ, Mikola EA, Pirela-Cruz MA. Management of posttraumatic segmental bone defects. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004 Jan-Feb;12(1):28-38. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200401000-00005.
DePuy Synthes. https://www.depuysynthes.com/hcp/spine/products/qs/vivigen-cellular-bone-matrix. Copyright DePuy Synthes 2014-2017. DePuy Synthes Biomaterials Division 1302 Wrights Lane East, West Chester, Pennsylvania 19380.
Vaccaro AR, Stubbs HA, Block JE. Demineralized bone matrix composite grafting for posterolateral spinal fusion. Orthopedics. 2007 Jul;30(7):567-70. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20070701-06.
Kang J, An H, Hilibrand A, Yoon ST, Kavanagh E, Boden S. Grafton and local bone have comparable outcomes to iliac crest bone in instrumented single-level lumbar fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 20;37(12):1083-91. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823ed817.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2018-158
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.