Comparative Analysis of Virtuos and Autograft in Lumbar Fusion

NCT ID: NCT05614284

Last Updated: 2025-11-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

6 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-11-14

Study Completion Date

2024-05-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Compare the lumbar fusion rates at 12 and 24 months when lumbar arthrodesis is performed using Virtuos or Autograft Bone Graft. Surgical approach is limited to TLIF (MIS or Open) with posterior fixation and supplemental posterolateral fusion as directed by physician, but must comply with FDA approved/cleared indication for use and labeling.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this study is to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (minimally invasive or open) with either Virtuos bone graft or autograft/allograft bone graft.

Compare the lumbar fusion rates at 12 and 24 months when lumbar arthrodesis is performed using Virtuos or Autograft Bone Graft. Surgical approach is limited to TLIF (MIS or Open) with posterior fixation and supplemental posterolateral fusion as directed by physician, but must comply with FDA approved/cleared indication for use and labeling.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Degenerative Disc Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

2:1 Enrollment: Virtuos vs. Autograft
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Virtuos

Virtuos +/- Local Bone

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Virtuos

Intervention Type DEVICE

Use of autograft or Virtuos Lyograft as an adjunct to spinal fusion in TLIF.

Autograft

Autograft +/- Allograft Chips

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Virtuos

Intervention Type DEVICE

Use of autograft or Virtuos Lyograft as an adjunct to spinal fusion in TLIF.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Virtuos

Use of autograft or Virtuos Lyograft as an adjunct to spinal fusion in TLIF.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Autograft

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. At least 18 years of age at the time of surgery
2. Undergoing lumbar spine fusion surgery with one of the following bone grafting options:

1. Virtuos
2. Virtuos with Autograft (local bone)
3. Autograft
4. Autograft + allograft (cancellous bone chips)
3. Subject must have a documented diagnosis of DDD. DDD is defined by back and/or radicular pain with degeneration of the disc as confirmed by medical history, physical examination, and radiographic studies that may include CT, MRI, plain X-ray film, discography, myelography, etc. with one or more of the following findings:

1. Instability as defined by \>3mm translation or \>5 degrees angulation
2. Osteophyte formation of facet joints or vertebral endplates
3. Decreased disc height, on average by \>2mm, but dependent upon the spinal level
4. Scarring/thickening of ligamentum flavum, annulus fibrosis, or facet joint capsule
5. Herniated nucleus pulposus
6. Facet joint degeneration/changes; and/or
7. Vacuum phenomenon
4. Subject may have up to a Grade I Spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine with clinical manifestations of one or more of the following phenomena:

1. Radiculopathy
2. Sensory deficit
3. Motor weakness
4. Reflex changes
5. Subject must require lumbar posterolateral arthrodesis at 1-2 contiguous levels (L1-S1).
6. The number of levels decompressed must equal the number of levels fused.
7. Subject must have been unresponsive to conservative care for at least 6 months prior to fusion surgery.
8. Subject must agree not to use electromagnetic adjuncts to enhance bone fusion during the course of the study
9. Subject must be willing and able to sign an informed consent document.
10. Subject must be willing and able to return for all follow-up visits, agree to participate in postoperative clinical and radiographic evaluations and comply with the required study regimen.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Subject is under 18 years of age (\<18) at the time of consent
2. Subject has had prior lumbar spine fusion surgery at any level
3. Subject has greater than grade 1 spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine
4. Subject is currently undergoing treatment for malignancy or has undergone treatment for malignancy in the past 5 years (benign skin cancer is permitted)
5. Subject is pregnant (confirmed by pregnancy test) or nursing or planning to become pregnant during the two years (24 months) following arthrodesis
6. Subject has an active local or systemic infection or is undergoing adjunctive treatment for local or systemic infection
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Orthofix Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Texas South Western

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Central CT Neurosurgery & Spine

New Britain, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Michigan Brain and Spine

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CP - 2201VLF

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Evidence For Fusion In Spine With Orthoss®
NCT03853356 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NanoFUSE® PL Gutter PMCF
NCT03751943 UNKNOWN PHASE4
Artoss Prospective Spine Registry Outcomes
NCT04439032 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING