Anterior Bridging Cage With Bone Substitute Versus Localized Autobone in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Arthrodesis

NCT ID: NCT02485574

Last Updated: 2021-12-08

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

69 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-03-31

Study Completion Date

2019-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluation for the pattern of bone bridging of patients who undergo transforaminal lumbar interbody arthrodesis, the investigators hypothesize that auto local bone mixed with β-calcium phosphate + hydroxyapatite (OSTEON 2, Genoss) is not inferior to auto local bone only. In addition, the investigators will analyze anterior new bone bridging pattern between anterior bridging cage newly developed and grafted bone in anterior disc space.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A single center, observational, single arm study to evaluate the efficacy of auto local bone mixed with β-calcium phosphate + hydroxyapatite using interbody fusion assessment on multi-axial CT scan. Its active comparator is auto local bone.

Anterior bridging bone between anterior grafted bone and inserted cage will be assessed by using newly developed anterior bridging cage as well as interbody bone bridging between two vertebral bodies on multi-axial reconstructed CT scan.

The patients undergoes arthrodesis surgery will have two cages, one augmented with auto local bone will be located at left side of disc space and the other cage augmented with auto local bone mixed with β-calcium phosphate + hydroxyapatite at right side of disc space.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stenosis Fusion of Spine (Disease)

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Bone bridging Arthrodesis Lumbar Cage

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Left cage- auto bone

At the operated segment, left cage was filled with auto bone only. We evaluated bone bridging between inside and outside the cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody arthrodesis.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

transforaminal lumbar interbody arthrodesis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Anterior bridging cages augmented with auto bone plus β-calcium phosphate + hydroxyapatite in right side of disc space and anterior bridging cages augmented with auto bone in left side of disc space in transforaminal lumbar interbody arthrodesis.

Right cage- auto local bone mixed with β-calcium phosphate + hydroxyapatite

At the operated segment, right cage was filled with auto local bone mixed with β-calcium phosphate + hydroxyapatite. We evaluated bone bridging between inside and outside the cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody arthrodesis.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

transforaminal lumbar interbody arthrodesis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Anterior bridging cages augmented with auto bone plus β-calcium phosphate + hydroxyapatite in right side of disc space and anterior bridging cages augmented with auto bone in left side of disc space in transforaminal lumbar interbody arthrodesis.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

transforaminal lumbar interbody arthrodesis

Anterior bridging cages augmented with auto bone plus β-calcium phosphate + hydroxyapatite in right side of disc space and anterior bridging cages augmented with auto bone in left side of disc space in transforaminal lumbar interbody arthrodesis.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

β-calcium phosphate + hydroxyapatite (OSTEON 2, Genoss) Auto-local bone

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who need lumbar interbody fusion in Degenerative spine disease on L1-S1(Spinal stenosis, HIVD and internal derangement of disk, spine instability)
* Patients who have no communication problems
* Patients who are willing to visit the hospital for any follow-up assessment
* Patients who voluntarily sign on a written consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who have infection
* Patients who have bleeding disorders
* Patients who have immunosuppressed disease
* Patients who can't sign on consent form
* Patients who are in pregnancy or breast feeding
* Patients who have severe osteoporosis
* Patients who can't take general surgery because of severe liver disease or decreased renal function
* Patients who have acute spinal injury, spinal tumor or inflammatory spinal disease
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zenoss Co, Ltd

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kwang Sup Song

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kwang Sup Song, M.D., PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chung-Ang University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kwang Sup Song

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Murphy DR, Hurwitz EL, Gregory A, Clary R. A nonsurgical approach to the management of patients with cervical radiculopathy: a prospective observational cohort study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 May;29(4):279-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.03.005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16690382 (View on PubMed)

SMITH GW, ROBINSON RA. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958 Jun;40-A(3):607-24. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 13539086 (View on PubMed)

CLOWARD RB. The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg. 1958 Nov;15(6):602-17. doi: 10.3171/jns.1958.15.6.0602. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 13599052 (View on PubMed)

Coric D, Branch CL Jr, Jenkins JD. Revision of anterior cervical pseudoarthrosis with anterior allograft fusion and plating. J Neurosurg. 1997 Jun;86(6):969-74. doi: 10.3171/jns.1997.86.6.0969.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9171175 (View on PubMed)

Savolainen S, Rinne J, Hernesniemi J. A prospective randomized study of anterior single-level cervical disc operations with long-term follow-up: surgical fusion is unnecessary. Neurosurgery. 1998 Jul;43(1):51-5. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199807000-00032.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9657188 (View on PubMed)

Shapiro S. Banked fibula and the locking anterior cervical plate in anterior cervical fusions following cervical discectomy. J Neurosurg. 1996 Feb;84(2):161-5. doi: 10.3171/jns.1996.84.2.0161.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8592216 (View on PubMed)

Wang JC, McDonough PW, Endow KK, Delamarter RB. Increased fusion rates with cervical plating for two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jan;25(1):41-5. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200001010-00009.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10647159 (View on PubMed)

Zoega B, Karrholm J, Lind B. Plate fixation adds stability to two-level anterior fusion in the cervical spine: a randomized study using radiostereometry. Eur Spine J. 1998;7(4):302-7. doi: 10.1007/s005860050079.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9765038 (View on PubMed)

Abd-Alrahman N, Dokmak AS, Abou-Madawi A. Anterior cervical discectomy (ACD) versus anterior cervical fusion (ACF), clinical and radiological outcome study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1999;141(10):1089-92. doi: 10.1007/s007010050487.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10550654 (View on PubMed)

An HS, Simpson JM, Glover JM, Stephany J. Comparison between allograft plus demineralized bone matrix versus autograft in anterior cervical fusion. A prospective multicenter study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Oct 15;20(20):2211-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8545714 (View on PubMed)

Bishop RC, Moore KA, Hadley MN. Anterior cervical interbody fusion using autogeneic and allogeneic bone graft substrate: a prospective comparative analysis. J Neurosurg. 1996 Aug;85(2):206-10. doi: 10.3171/jns.1996.85.2.0206.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8755747 (View on PubMed)

Cauthen JC, Kinard RE, Vogler JB, Jackson DE, DePaz OB, Hunter OL, Wasserburger LB, Williams VM. Outcome analysis of noninstrumented anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion in 348 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Jan 15;23(2):188-92. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199801150-00008.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9474724 (View on PubMed)

Geisler FH, Caspar W, Pitzen T, Johnson TA. Reoperation in patients after anterior cervical plate stabilization in degenerative disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Apr 15;23(8):911-20. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199804150-00013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9580959 (View on PubMed)

Hacker RJ, Cauthen JC, Gilbert TJ, Griffith SL. A prospective randomized multicenter clinical evaluation of an anterior cervical fusion cage. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Oct 15;25(20):2646-54; discussion 2655. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200010150-00017.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11034651 (View on PubMed)

Lofgren H, Johannsson V, Olsson T, Ryd L, Levander B. Rigid fusion after cloward operation for cervical disc disease using autograft, allograft, or xenograft: a randomized study with radiostereometric and clinical follow-up assessment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Aug 1;25(15):1908-16. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200008010-00008.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10908933 (View on PubMed)

Lowery GL, McDonough RF. The significance of hardware failure in anterior cervical plate fixation. Patients with 2- to 7-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Jan 15;23(2):181-6; discussion 186-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199801150-00006.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9474723 (View on PubMed)

Tribus CB, Corteen DP, Zdeblick TA. The efficacy of anterior cervical plating in the management of symptomatic pseudoarthrosis of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 May 1;24(9):860-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199905010-00005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10327506 (View on PubMed)

Gercek E, Arlet V, Delisle J, Marchesi D. Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning. Eur Spine J. 2003 Oct;12(5):513-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0539-6. Epub 2003 Jun 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12827473 (View on PubMed)

Bagby GW. Arthrodesis by the distraction-compression method using a stainless steel implant. Orthopedics. 1988 Jun;11(6):931-4. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19880601-13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3387340 (View on PubMed)

DeBowes RM, Grant BD, Bagby GW, Gallina AM, Sande RD, Ratzlaff MH. Cervical vertebral interbody fusion in the horse: a comparative study of bovine xenografts and autografts supported by stainless steel baskets. Am J Vet Res. 1984 Jan;45(1):191-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6367560 (View on PubMed)

Wilke HJ, Kettler A, Goetz C, Claes L. Subsidence resulting from simulated postoperative neck movements: an in vitro investigation with a new cervical fusion cage. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 1;25(21):2762-70. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011010-00008.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11064521 (View on PubMed)

Toth JM, Wang M, Estes BT, Scifert JL, Seim HB 3rd, Turner AS. Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications. Biomaterials. 2006 Jan;27(3):324-34. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.011. Epub 2005 Aug 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16115677 (View on PubMed)

Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. 2007 Nov;28(32):4845-69. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013. Epub 2007 Aug 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17686513 (View on PubMed)

Yao C, Storey D, Webster TJ. Nanostructured metal coatings on polymers increase osteoblast attachment. Int J Nanomedicine. 2007;2(3):487-92.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18019846 (View on PubMed)

Han CM, Lee EJ, Kim HE, Koh YH, Kim KN, Ha Y, Kuh SU. The electron beam deposition of titanium on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and the resulting enhanced biological properties. Biomaterials. 2010 May;31(13):3465-70. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.030. Epub 2010 Feb 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20153890 (View on PubMed)

Cho DY, Lee WY, Sheu PC, Chen CC. Cage containing a biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic (Triosite) for the treatment of cervical spondylosis. Surg Neurol. 2005 Jun;63(6):497-503; discussion 503-4. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2004.10.016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15936361 (View on PubMed)

Kast E, Derakhshani S, Bothmann M, Oberle J. Subsidence after anterior cervical inter-body fusion. A randomized prospective clinical trial. Neurosurg Rev. 2009 Apr;32(2):207-14; discussion 214. doi: 10.1007/s10143-008-0168-y. Epub 2008 Sep 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18797946 (View on PubMed)

Kulkarni AG, Hee HT, Wong HK. Solis cage (PEEK) for anterior cervical fusion: preliminary radiological results with emphasis on fusion and subsidence. Spine J. 2007 Mar-Apr;7(2):205-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.03.002. Epub 2006 Nov 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17321970 (View on PubMed)

Cho DY, Liau WR, Lee WY, Liu JT, Chiu CL, Sheu PC. Preliminary experience using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage in the treatment of cervical disc disease. Neurosurgery. 2002 Dec;51(6):1343-49; discussion 1349-50.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12445338 (View on PubMed)

Kandziora F, Pflugmacher R, Scholz M, Schnake K, Putzier M, Khodadadyan-Klostermann C, Haas NP. Treatment of traumatic cervical spine instability with interbody fusion cages: a prospective controlled study with a 2-year follow-up. Injury. 2005 Jul;36 Suppl 2:B27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2005.06.012.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15993115 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KSong

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id