Effects of Resistance Training With High vs. Light-moderate Loads on Muscle-tendon Function in the Elderly

NCT ID: NCT03724461

Last Updated: 2020-06-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

55 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-09-01

Study Completion Date

2020-03-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There are no unbiased studies that have analyzed the effects of resistance training with traditional, heavy versus light-moderate loads on muscle, tendon and bone in elderly people.

The purpose of the present study is to assess the effects on muscle mass and function, tendon and bone of two different training intensities, light-moderate vs. heavy load, in people older than 65 years old.

The study will be carried out with a randomized controlled design. Participants will perform single training sessions and a 12-wk dynamic resistance training program on the knee extensors with different training intensities on each leg. One leg will train with heavy loads and the other one will train with light-moderate loads, but matching the load x repetitions performed by the contralateral side.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The decline in muscle function provoked by the aging process and frailty are directly related to decreases in mobility and the ability to perform the so called "daily life activities". Resistance training is especially useful at this stage, given that it is an effective and widely applicable intervention to control and revert sarcopenia, and the deterioration of tendon and bone function. Despite of the effectiveness of heavy load resistance training, a controversy has arisen in the last years about the effects of lower load resistance training programs to achieve similar adaptations. This is because most of the studies that have compared light-moderate versus heavy load programs did not control the differences in total training load, measured as the overall mechanical work performed during the training program. Therefore, there are no unbiased studies that have analyzed the effects of resistance training with traditional, heavy versus light-moderate loads on muscle, tendon and bone in elderly people.

The purpose of the present study is to assess the effects on muscle mass and function, tendon and bone of two different training intensities, light-moderate vs. heavy load, in people older than 65 years old.

The studies will be carried out with a crossover (acute training sessions) and randomized controlled design (longitudinal training intervention). Participants will perform single training sessions with each resistance training intensity and a 12-wk dynamic resistance training program on the knee extensors with different training intensities on each leg. One leg will train with heavy loads and the other one will train with light-moderate loads, but matching the load x repetitions performed by the contralateral side. Muscle adaptations (EMG, muscle size and architecture), tendon mechanical properties, bone mineral density, blood parameters and life quality will be analyzed before and after the cessation of the training program.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aging Sarcopenia Frail Elderly Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High intensity vs Control (12 weeks)

8 weeks of baseline period plus an exercise program where one leg undergoes High Intensity resistance training (12 weeks) and the other leg is established as control.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

High Intensity resistance training (12 weeks)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

High intensity resistance training (80% of 1 repetition maximum), 2 d/wk (Longitudinal)

Control (12 weeks)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

No resistance training during the intervention period.

Light intensity vs Control (12 weeks)

8 weeks of baseline period plus an exercise program where one leg undergoes light-moderate intensity resistance training (12 weeks) and the other leg is established as control.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Light-moderate intensity resistance training (12 weeks)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Light-moderate intensity resistance training (40% of 1 repetition maximum), 2 d/wk (Longitudinal)

Control (12 weeks)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

No resistance training during the intervention period.

High vs Light intensity (12 weeks)

8 weeks of baseline period plus an exercise program where one leg undergoes High Intensity resistance training (12 weeks) and the other leg undergoes light-moderate intensity resistance training.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

High Intensity resistance training (12 weeks)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

High intensity resistance training (80% of 1 repetition maximum), 2 d/wk (Longitudinal)

Light-moderate intensity resistance training (12 weeks)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Light-moderate intensity resistance training (40% of 1 repetition maximum), 2 d/wk (Longitudinal)

High intensity (Acute)

Analysis of the effects of one High Intensity resistance training session, with a crossover design.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

One High Intensity resistance training session

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

High intensity resistance training, 1 training session

Light intensity (Acute)

Analysis of the effects of one Light-moderate Intensity resistance training session, with a crossover design.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

One Light-moderate intensity resistance training session

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Light-moderate intensity resistance training, 1 training session

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

High Intensity resistance training (12 weeks)

High intensity resistance training (80% of 1 repetition maximum), 2 d/wk (Longitudinal)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Light-moderate intensity resistance training (12 weeks)

Light-moderate intensity resistance training (40% of 1 repetition maximum), 2 d/wk (Longitudinal)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Control (12 weeks)

No resistance training during the intervention period.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

One High Intensity resistance training session

High intensity resistance training, 1 training session

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

One Light-moderate intensity resistance training session

Light-moderate intensity resistance training, 1 training session

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

HIT LIT CON HIT (Acute) LIT (Acute)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 65 years and older,
* non-institutionalized
* passed physical examination including physical function assessment (no frailty status; SPPB \>7 points)

Exclusion Criteria

* Neurological, musculoskeletal, or other disorder that would preclude completing resistance training and all performance tests
* Uncontrolled hypertension, unstable or exercise-induced angina pectoris or myocardial ischemia or any other medical condition that would interfere with testing or increase one's risk of complications during exercise.
* History of regular resistance exercise during the previous 3 years
* Knee prosthesis
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Biomedical Research Networking Center on Frailty and Healthy Aging (CIBERFES)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Castilla-La Mancha

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Luis M. Alegre

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Luis M. Alegre, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Associate Professor

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Laboratorio de Actividad Física y Función Muscular. Campus de la Fábrica de Armas. Avda. Carlos III s/n

Toledo, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rodriguez-Lopez C, Alcazar J, Losa-Reyna J, Martin-Espinosa NM, Baltasar-Fernandez I, Ara I, Csapo R, Alegre LM. Effects of Power-Oriented Resistance Training With Heavy vs. Light Loads on Muscle-Tendon Function in Older Adults: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Physiol. 2021 Feb 18;12:635094. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.635094. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33679447 (View on PubMed)

Rodriguez-Lopez C, Alcazar J, Sanchez-Martin C, Ara I, Csapo R, Alegre LM. Mechanical Characteristics of Heavy vs. Light Load Ballistic Resistance Training in Older Adults. J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Aug 1;36(8):2094-2101. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003826. Epub 2020 Sep 16.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32947572 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DEP2015-69386-R

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.