Measurement of the Distance Between the Corresponding Anatomical Landmarks in the Thoracic Cavity and the Incisors

NCT ID: NCT03720405

Last Updated: 2018-10-25

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: UNKNOWN
• Total Enrollment: 520 participants
• Study Classification: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2018-07-31
• Study Completion Date: 2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Patients who agree to receive pneumonectomy will be arranged to measure the distance from the incisors to the corresponding anatomical landmarks, including the cardia, the inferior pulmonary vein, the carina, the azygos vein, the lower edge of the aortic arch, the upper edge of the aortic arch, and the cupula of pleura through " fiber measurement method within nasogastric tube " . After building regression equations with the above data, the distance from the incisors to these corresponding anatomical landmarks could be inferred by means of indexes including height and so on.

Conditions

Pulmonary Resection

Study Design

• Observational Model Type: COHORT
• Study Time Perspective: CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Patients undergoing thoracic operation(such as radical lung cancer resection, pulmonary lobectomy, pulmonary segmentectomy, etc.) under endotracheal anesthesia ,which can expose the corresponding anatomical landmarks;
• Patients undergoing nasogastric intubation due to their condition.

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients with diseased or deformed esophagus;
• Patients with obvious thoracic deformity, spinal deformity or dysplasia;
• Patients whose thoracic anatomical landmarks can not be exposed or exposed clearly during operation;
• Patients who do not agree to be measured.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Locations

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Guandong, Guangdong, China

Site Status: RECRUITING

Countries

China

Central Contacts

Di Lu, MD,PhD

Role: CONTACT

david_lu1989@163.com

86+13268379321

Siyang Feng, MD

Role: CONTACT

fengsy89@163.com

86+13570930671

Facility Contacts

Di Lu, MD, PhD

Role: primary

david_lu189@163.com

86+13268379321

Siyang Feng, MD

Role: backup

fengsy89@163.com

86+13570930671

References

Japan Esophageal Society. Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer, 11th Edition: part I. Esophagus. 2017;14(1):1-36. doi: 10.1007/s10388-016-0551-7. Epub 2016 Nov 10. No abstract available.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 28111535 (View on PubMed)

Rice TW, Ishwaran H, Ferguson MK, Blackstone EH, Goldstraw P. Cancer of the Esophagus and Esophagogastric Junction: An Eighth Edition Staging Primer. J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Jan;12(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.10.016. Epub 2016 Oct 31.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 27810391 (View on PubMed)

Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR, Gisbertz SS, Klinkenbijl JH, Hollmann MW, de Lange ES, Bonjer HJ, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012 May 19;379(9829):1887-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9. Epub 2012 May 1.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 22552194 (View on PubMed)

Lagergren J, Smyth E, Cunningham D, Lagergren P. Oesophageal cancer. Lancet. 2017 Nov 25;390(10110):2383-2396. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31462-9. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 28648400 (View on PubMed)

Javidfar J, Speicher PJ, Hartwig MG, D'Amico TA, Berry MF. Impact of Positive Margins on Survival in Patients Undergoing Esophagogastrectomy for Esophageal Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Mar;101(3):1060-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.005. Epub 2015 Nov 11.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 26576752 (View on PubMed)

Markar SR, Gronnier C, Duhamel A, Pasquer A, Thereaux J, Chalret du Rieu M, Lefevre JH, Turner K, Luc G, Mariette C; FREGAT Working Group-FRENCH-AFC. Significance of Microscopically Incomplete Resection Margin After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer. Ann Surg. 2016 Apr;263(4):712-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001325.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 26135681 (View on PubMed)

Gilbert S, Martel AB, Seely AJ, Maziak DE, Shamji FM, Sundaresan SR, Villeneuve PJ. Prognostic significance of a positive radial margin after esophageal cancer resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Feb;149(2):548-55; discussion 555. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.10.040. Epub 2014 Oct 14.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 25454924 (View on PubMed)

Chan DS, Reid TD, Howell I, Lewis WG. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the influence of circumferential resection margin involvement on survival in patients with operable oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg. 2013 Mar;100(4):456-64. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9015. Epub 2013 Jan 14.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 23319427 (View on PubMed)

Okada N, Fujii S, Fujita T, Kanamori J, Kojima T, Hayashi R, Daiko H. The prognostic significance of the positive circumferential resection margin in pathologic T3 squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Surgery. 2016 Feb;159(2):441-50. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.06.044. Epub 2015 Sep 19.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 26391150 (View on PubMed)

Wu J, Chen QX, Teng LS, Krasna MJ. Prognostic significance of positive circumferential resection margin in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Feb;97(2):446-53. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.10.043. Epub 2013 Dec 21.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24365211 (View on PubMed)

Korn O, Csendes A, Burdiles P, Braghetto I, Sagastume H, Biagini L. Length of the esophagus in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus compared to controls. Surgery. 2003 Apr;133(4):358-63. doi: 10.1067/msy.2003.117.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 12717351 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

NFEC-2018-85

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id