Regional Haemodynamic Changes in Radial Artery Assessment With Continuous Pulsed-wave Doppler Ultrasound

NCT ID: NCT03302221

Last Updated: 2020-03-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-10-15

Study Completion Date

2020-09-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of the trial was to evaluate velocity-associated parameters of pulsed-wave Doppler ultrasound at induction, discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit and during inspiratory cough in addition to the consumption of phenylephrine during the operation in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery with three types of anaesthesia management.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The objective of the trial was to evaluate velocity-associated parameters of pulsed-wave Doppler ultrasound at induction, discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit and during inspiratory cough in addition to the consumption of phenylephrine during the operation in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery with three types of anaesthesia management. The patients in this trial were visited during the entire operation and just before leaving the post-anaesthesia care unit. Velocity-associated data related to pulsed-wave Doppler ultrasound and the consumption of phenylephrine were collected.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Doppler Ultrasonography Assessed Vascular Changes
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group control

In the control group, local anaesthesia at the incision was induced by 0.5% ropivacaine by the surgeon just before the surgery.

Group Type OTHER

0.5% ropivacaine local anaesthesia

Intervention Type DRUG

local anaesthesia at the incision was induced by 0.5% ropivacaine by the surgeon just before the surgery.

Paravertebral Block Group

In Group Paravertebral Block, patients received standardized general anaesthesia supplemented by paravertebral Block. The USG approach for TPVB was used with the patient in the lateral position at the T4-T6 level according to the incision protocol in our centre.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

0.5% ropivacaine paravertebral block

Intervention Type DRUG

The investigators designed a study to assess whether there were any blood flow indexes change during induction with doppler ultrasonography after 0.5% ropivacaine paravertebral block

Epidural Block Group

The investigators designed a study to assess whether there were any blood flow indexes change during induction with doppler ultrasonography ;general anesthesia combined with epidural block

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

0.25% ropivacaine epidural block

Intervention Type DRUG

A 4-5 ml bolus of 0.25% ropivacaine was administered 1 h after the initiation of TEB.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

0.5% ropivacaine paravertebral block

The investigators designed a study to assess whether there were any blood flow indexes change during induction with doppler ultrasonography after 0.5% ropivacaine paravertebral block

Intervention Type DRUG

0.25% ropivacaine epidural block

A 4-5 ml bolus of 0.25% ropivacaine was administered 1 h after the initiation of TEB.

Intervention Type DRUG

0.5% ropivacaine local anaesthesia

local anaesthesia at the incision was induced by 0.5% ropivacaine by the surgeon just before the surgery.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. ethnic Chinese;
2. age, 18 to 65 years old;
3. American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II;
4. required VATS for lung surgery and one lung ventilation .

Exclusion Criteria

body mass index exceeding 30 kg/m2; Patients with a history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus or arteriosclerosis; and any allergy to drugs used in the study.

Patients with arrhythmias or implanted cardiac pacemakers were excluded. Patients with diseases of the central or peripheral nervous system were excluded.

Patients taking medications affecting the autonomic nervous system, such as b-blockers and calcium channel blockers
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

China Medical University, China

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Wen-fei Tan

Associate proffesor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hong Ma, MD,PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Department of Anesthesiology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

the First Hospital of China Medical University

Shenyang, Liaoning, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20170711-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.