Study of Open and Percutaneous Release of Acquired Trigger Thumb

NCT ID: NCT03679793

Last Updated: 2018-09-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-08-31

Study Completion Date

2015-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Trigger finger, also known as trigger digit or stenosing tenovaginitis, is caused by a size mismatch between the flexor tendon and the A1 pulley, which is generally characterized by pain, swelling, the limitation of finger range of motion and a symptomatic locking or clicking sensation. Conservative treatment options include the application of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), physiotherapy, electrotherapy, splinting and corticosteroid injection but not always effective with regard to frequent recurrence. Open surgical release of the A1 pulley remains the gold standard of treating symptomatic trigger finger. While percutaneous release is a minimal invasive alternative and gaining popularity for the index, middle ring and little fingers, investigations for the surgical efficacy on thumb is few and far between. Investigators believe that a carefully conducted operation with proper positioning of the thumb, wide-awake approach and meticulous technique can achieve similar efficacy and safety in terms of possibly less intraoperative pain, imperceptible scar and early return to daily activities and routine work.

The hypothesis of this study is that by using a proper positioning of thumb, wide awake approach and meticulous technique in conducting percutaneous release of trigger thumb can achieve similar efficacy and safety compared to that of open release surgical method. Moreover, percutaneous release of trigger thumb can generate less intraoperative pain, imperceptible scar and promote early return to routine work.

Hence, the objective of this study is to investigate and compare the safety, effectiveness and outcome of percutaneous release versus traditional open release for trigger thumbs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Trigger Thumb

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Open Release Group

Open surgical release of the A1 pulley is the gold standard of treating symptomatic trigger finger.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Open Release Group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open surgical release of the A1 pulley is the gold standard of treating symptomatic trigger finger

Percutaneous Release Group

Percutaneous release is a minimal invasive alternative surgical procedure

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Percutaneous Release Group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Percutaneous release is a minimal invasive alternative surgical procedure

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Open Release Group

Open surgical release of the A1 pulley is the gold standard of treating symptomatic trigger finger

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Percutaneous Release Group

Percutaneous release is a minimal invasive alternative surgical procedure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of trigger thumb with Green's staging graded 2-4
* Patients were unresponsive to conservative treatments for more than 3 months (Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physiotherapy, splinting, or injection of steroid)

Exclusion Criteria

* With history in rheumatoid arthritis
* Unable to give verbal or written consent.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chinese University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr TSE Wing Lim

Associate Consultant and Clinical Associate Professor (Honorary)

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Trigger thumb_Protocol_v02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Trigger Finger Trial
NCT05251428 COMPLETED NA
ESWT vs Orthosis in Trigger Finger
NCT06737601 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA