Treatment of Trigger Finger With Steroid Injection Versus Steroid Injection and Splinting
NCT ID: NCT01886157
Last Updated: 2015-03-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-05-31
2016-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of Cortisone Injection and Splinting for Trigger Finger
NCT03156829
Trigger Finger Treatment
NCT03847935
Study Comparing One Versus Two Cortisone Injections for Trigger Finger
NCT00951236
Trigger Finger Corticosteroid Injection With and Without Local Anesthetic
NCT04023695
Long Term Effectiveness of Trigger Finger Injections With Triamcinolone vs. Dexamethasone
NCT03641508
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although multiple treatment strategies are available, it is not entirely clear which treatment offers the best outcome, especially when the finger has not reached end stage locking. In general, corticosteroid injection into the tendon sheath is offered as the first line of treatment. Splinting alone has also been described as a reliable method treatment. However, Patel and Bassini indicated that steroid injection results in fewer recurrences than splinting alone. Surgery is typically reserved for recurrent triggering, cases refractory to injection, or digits locked in flexion. The effects of steroid injection followed by splinting however have not been reported in a comprehensive fashion. It may be that this form of treatment could result in a synergistic effect, which can offer a treatment modality superior to either injection or splinting alone. The purpose of this research study is to determine whether steroid injection followed by splinting is superior to injection alone.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Corticosteroid injection
Standard corticosteroid injection.
Corticosteroid injection
Standard trigger finger corticosteroid injection.
Corticosteroid Injection and Trigger Splint
Corticosteroid Injection + Trigger Splint + Education + Home Exercises
Corticosteroid injection + Trigger Splint+ Education and Home exercises
Standard corticosteroid injection. Hand based, single digit trigger splint will be applied. Education and instructions about home exercises.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Corticosteroid injection + Trigger Splint+ Education and Home exercises
Standard corticosteroid injection. Hand based, single digit trigger splint will be applied. Education and instructions about home exercises.
Corticosteroid injection
Standard trigger finger corticosteroid injection.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Adult patient aged over 18 years.
* No prior treatment (splinting, injection or surgery) to the involved finger OR at least 1 year since last treatment of the involved finger.
Exclusion Criteria
* Exclude locked digits because surgery is indicated in these cases
* Pregnant patients
* Prisoners
* Patients with impaired decision-making capacity
* Patients that do not speak English and cannot fill in English language questionnaires.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Philadelphia & South Jersey Hand Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sidney M. Jacoby
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sidney Jacoby, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
The Philadelphia and South Jersey Hand Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Philadelphia and South Jersey Hand Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ring D, Lozano-Calderon S, Shin R, Bastian P, Mudgal C, Jupiter J. A prospective randomized controlled trial of injection of dexamethasone versus triamcinolone for idiopathic trigger finger. J Hand Surg Am. 2008 Apr;33(4):516-22; discussion 523-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.01.001.
Strom L. Trigger finger in diabetes. J Med Soc N J. 1977 Nov;74(11):951-4. No abstract available.
Colbourn J, Heath N, Manary S, Pacifico D. Effectiveness of splinting for the treatment of trigger finger. J Hand Ther. 2008 Oct-Dec;21(4):336-43. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2008.05.001. Epub 2008 Aug 22.
Patel MR, Bassini L. Trigger fingers and thumb: when to splint, inject, or operate. J Hand Surg Am. 1992 Jan;17(1):110-3. doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(92)90124-8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
11C.554
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.