Ultrasound Guided Corticosteroid Injection at A1 Pulley in Comparison to Percutaneous A1 Pulley Release as a Treatment for Idiopathic Trigger Finger

NCT ID: NCT05170152

Last Updated: 2022-08-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-11-01

Study Completion Date

2021-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of ultrasonography guided corticosteroid injection at A1 pulley and percutaneous A1 pulley release as a treatment for trigger finger.

Methods: 75 patients with idiopathic trigger finger were enrolled in our prospective study. Patients with diabetes mellitus, previous history of open release for trigger finger, different inflammatory arthritis and multiple trigger fingers affections were excluded. Group A 40 patients: Underwent ultrasound guided methyl prednisolone acetate injection, between A1 pulley and tendons .Group B 35 patients :Underwent ultrasonography-guided percutaneous A1 pulley needle release .All patients were subjected to the following before and after intervention by 1 and 3 months , DASH, trigger finger classification grade \& VAS

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Trigger finger ( TF) is a pathologic problem of the finger leads to a painful tendon snap or click on flexion and extension, and/or locking of the metacarpophalangealor proximal interphalngeal joint (1) . Entrapment of the affected tendon at the first annular (A1) pulley occurs because of a differencein the diameter of the flexor tendon and its sheath as a result of thickening of the sheath and or localized tendon thickening.(1) . Most cases of trigger fingers are idiopathic and the incidence is around 28 cases per 100 000 population per year, or a lifetime risk of 2.6% in the general population and about 10% of patients are diabetics (1). Women are usually more affected than men, usually in the fifth and sixth decades(2) it is more common in women than in men, usually in the dominant hand, and most often in the thumb or ring fingers followed . (2) The diagnosis of trigger finger is based mainly on the medical history and clinical examination. The most important characteristic clinical sign is the mechanical blocking of the finger when flexed with painful snapping extended. (3). Management includes many options such as conservative treatment in the form of splinting, physical therapy, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and local steroid injections, and surgical pulley release

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

US-guided Release of the A1 Pulley Responsible for Trigger Finger is Feasible With a 21-gauge Needle

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

. Group A

Underwent ultrasound guided methyl prednisolone acetate injection, between A1 pulley and tendons

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ultrasonography-guided injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ultrasonography-guided injection

Group B

Underwent ultrasonography-guided percutaneous A1 pulley needle release

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

pullae A1 release

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ultrasonography-guided pullae A1 release

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ultrasonography-guided injection

ultrasonography-guided injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

pullae A1 release

ultrasonography-guided pullae A1 release

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Idiopathic trigger finger present for at least 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with diabetes mellitus, previous history of open release for trigger finger, different inflammatory arthritis and multiple trigger fingers affections.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Manal Hassanien

Associate professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Assiut governorate

Asyut, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

trigger finger

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Trigger Finger Treatment
NCT03847935 COMPLETED
Trigger Finger Trial
NCT05251428 COMPLETED NA
ESWT vs Orthosis in Trigger Finger
NCT06737601 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA