Efficacies of Different Managements in Patients With Trigger Finger

NCT ID: NCT06382623

Last Updated: 2024-06-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-10-01

Study Completion Date

2023-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of peritendinous steroid injection under ultrasound guidance and percutaneous A1 pulley release procedures in terms of disease stage, pain, and severity of locking in patients with trigger finger.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study was designed as a randomized, controlled, prospective study. Patients who had been experiencing trigger finger symptoms for at least one month and who presented to the Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital, affiliated with the Health Sciences University Faculty of Medicine

Patients were randomly divided into two groups: the peritendinous steroid group (n=15) and the percutaneous pulley release group (n=15). In the first group, under ultrasound guidance, a mixture of 1 ml corticosteroid (2 mg+5 mg/ml betamethasone) and 1 ml local anesthetic (20 ml 2% prilocaine) was injected peritendinously between the A1 pulley and the flexor tendon sheath. In the second group, a percutaneous A1 pulley release procedure was performed under ultrasound guidance using a 20 G needle, followed by peritendinous injection of the same mixture of corticosteroid and local anesthetic.

Patients were evaluated four times: before treatment, at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after treatment. Modified Quinnel classification, VAS (Visual Analog Scale), and severity of locking scales were used as outcome measures in the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Trigger Finger

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

The peritendinous steroid group

A 1 ml mixture of corticosteroid (2 mg + 5 mg/ml betamethasone) and 1 ml of local anesthetic agent (20 ml 2% prilocaine) was injected peritendinously between the A1 pulley and the flexor tendon sheath at the metacarpophalangeal joint level under ultrasound guidance.

The peritendinous Betamethasone group

Intervention Type OTHER

USG-guided injection of corticosteroid between the A1 pulley and the flexor tendon sheath.

The percutaneous A1 pulley release group

In the A1 pulley release group, 1 ml of local anesthetic agent (20 ml 2% prilocaine) was injected into the pulley-associated subcutaneous tissue using a 27 G needle under ultrasound guidance. The metacarpophalangeal joint was brought into slight hyperextension. Subsequently, a 20 G 0.9x38mm needle, modified by bending approximately 40-45 degrees from the proximal 1/3 of the needle with the aid of a cap, was used. The needle was advanced in-plane from distal to proximal along the midline, with simultaneous movement towards the palmar surface, aiming to cut or loosen the pulley between the tendon and A1 pulley. The loosening procedure was repeated from the distal to proximal aspect of the pulley until the sensation of resistance at the needle tip disappeared.

The percutaneous A1 pulley release

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous pulley release is a procedure aimed at loosening the pulley using various cutting instruments or hypodermic needles under ultrasound guidance.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

The percutaneous A1 pulley release

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous pulley release is a procedure aimed at loosening the pulley using various cutting instruments or hypodermic needles under ultrasound guidance.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The peritendinous Betamethasone group

USG-guided injection of corticosteroid between the A1 pulley and the flexor tendon sheath.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Being over 18 years of age
* Having had trigger finger complaints for more than 1 month
* Not having received any injections for trigger finger diagnosis within the last 1 month
* Signing the informed consent form indicating willingness to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusing to participate in the study
* Presence of partial or complete tendon rupture in the relevant tendon of the finger to be treated
* Presence of wounds and infection in the area where the procedure will be performed
* Pregnancy status
* History of allergy to the injected medications (local anesthetic, steroid)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yasin Demir

principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

zeliha gizem mac, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

university of health sciences, Department of PM&R

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

43

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Trigger Finger Treatment
NCT03847935 COMPLETED
ESWT vs Orthosis in Trigger Finger
NCT06737601 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Trigger Finger Trial
NCT05251428 COMPLETED NA