Percutaneous Trigger Finger Release Concomitant Steroid Injection Versus Percutaneous Trigger Finger Release Alone
NCT ID: NCT06288685
Last Updated: 2024-03-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
38 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-10-11
2024-01-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Percutaneous A1 pulley release is a cost-effective and straightforward procedure with outcomes comparable to open A1 pulley release. Postoperative pain is a prevalent concern. Corticosteroid injection is a common nonoperative treatment for trigger finger, providing favorable outcomes but associated with a notable risk of recurrence. Numerous studies have explored the combined approach of percutaneous trigger finger release with corticosteroid injection. However, to date, there is no report on early postoperative results.
Objective:
To conduct a comparative analysis of early postoperative outcomes between percutaneous A1 pulley release with steroid injection and percutaneous A1 pulley release alone.
Study Design \& Methods:
This study constitutes a randomized controlled trial involving patients with trigger finger who underwent percutaneous release surgery from October 2023 to January 2024. A total of 38 patients were enrolled, with 18 assigned to the percutaneous A1 pulley release with steroid injection group and 20 to the percutaneous A1 pulley release alone group. Postoperative assessments included pain scores using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), evaluation of quality of life through the QuickDASH score (qDASH), patient satisfaction, and complications.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Percutaneous Release vs Steroid Injection for Trigger Finger
NCT05383040
Ultrasound Guided A1 Pulley Release For The Treatment of Trigger Finger
NCT02830672
Efficacies of Different Managements in Patients With Trigger Finger
NCT06382623
Comparison Between 2 Treatment Modalities of Trigger Finger: Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Release of A1 Pulley by a Needle Knife Versus Ultrasound-guided Corticosteroid Injection in the Treatment of Trigger Finger
NCT06785935
Ultrasound Guided Corticosteroid Injection at A1 Pulley in Comparison to Percutaneous A1 Pulley Release as a Treatment for Idiopathic Trigger Finger
NCT05170152
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study Population:
Patients diagnosed with trigger finger, aged 18 years or older, and classified under Quinell's grade 2, 3, or 4, were included in the study \[ \]. Recruitment took place at the Outpatient Orthopedic Department of the Police General Hospital between October 2023 and January 2024. Exclusion criteria encompassed individuals with a history of prior hand surgery, Dupuytren's disease, type 1 diabetes, previous phalangeal fractures, recent steroid injection within the last month, and autoimmune diseases.
Group allocation and Randomization:
Patients were enrolled and randomized into two groups, percutaneous A1 pulley release with steroid injection (Group A) and percutaneous A1 pulley release alone (Group B), by utilizing computer generate randomization and the results were put in opaque sealed envelopes. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and surgeries were performed by the same surgeon (WJ).
Surgical Technique:
The surgical procedure followed Eastwood's method \[ \], involving the following steps:
1. Preparation of the sterile field.
2. Injection of 1% lidocaine with epinephrine at the surgical site.
3. Insertion of an 18-gauge needle following the tract from the previous injection.
4. Patient extension of the finger to bring flexor tendons close to the skin, moving the neurovascular structures away.
5. Slow penetration of the needle until it is over the A1 pulley.
6. Gentle flexion of the finger while observing the needle tip to prevent penetrating the flexor tendon.
7. Rotation of the needle bevel into a longitudinal orientation to the flexor tendon.
8. Release of the A1 pulley by moving the needle upward and downward parallel to the flexor tendon until complete release is achieved.
9. Withdrawal of the needle while hyperextending the finger.
10. Flexion and extension of the finger to check for triggering.
11. Injection of triamcinolone (40mg/ml) 1 ml in the study group.
12. Closure of the wound with a small elastic dressing.
Postoperative Protocols:
Both groups received identical postoperative protocols, including the same medications (Augmentin, Naproxen, Tolperisone) for 7 days. Patients were encouraged for early finger range of motion without restriction.
Outcome Measures:
The primary outcome measure was pain score assessed by the VAS. Secondary outcomes included quality of life measured by the qDASH score, patient satisfaction, and surgical complications.
Follow-Up:
All cases underwent follow-up via telephone on postoperative days 1 to 6, in the clinic during the first and second weeks, and at 1 to 2 months postoperative.
Statistical analysis In this study, all data calculations were conducted using Stata software (version 17.0). Group comparisons involved the application of Pearson's chi-squared test or Continuity Correction chi-squared test for categorical variables, and the student's t-test was employed for continuous variables. Statistically significant differences were defined as those with a P-value \< 0.05.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Patients were enrolled and randomized into two groups, percutaneous A1 pulley release with steroid injection (Group A) and percutaneous A1 pulley release alone (Group B), by utilizing computer generate randomization and the results were put in opaque sealed envelopes. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and surgeries were performed by the same surgeon (WJ).
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
group1
percutaneous A1 pulley release with Triamcinolone injection
percutaneous A1 pulley release
Treatment trigger finger by release A1 pulley by percutaneous procedure
Triamcinolone
Triamcinolone 40mg/ml 1 ml injection concomitant percutaneous A1 pulley release
group0
percutaneous A1 pulley release alone
percutaneous A1 pulley release
Treatment trigger finger by release A1 pulley by percutaneous procedure
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
percutaneous A1 pulley release
Treatment trigger finger by release A1 pulley by percutaneous procedure
Triamcinolone
Triamcinolone 40mg/ml 1 ml injection concomitant percutaneous A1 pulley release
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* aged 18 years or older
* trigger finger are classified under Quinell's grade 2, 3, or 4
Exclusion Criteria
* Dupuytren's disease
* type 1 diabetes
* previous phalangeal fractures
* recent steroid injection within the last month
* autoimmune diseases
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Police General Hospital, Thailand
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Weeraphat Saartying
Orthopedic Resident
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Police General Hospital
Bangkok, Pathumwan, Thailand
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
73/256
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
73/256
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.