A Clinical Study to Compare Functional Outcomes After Surgery Using a Transverse or Longitudinal Surgical Incision in the Skin.
NCT ID: NCT06267105
Last Updated: 2024-08-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
36 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-05-15
2025-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Function and Scar in Trigger Finger Release
NCT05477290
Study of Open and Percutaneous Release of Acquired Trigger Thumb
NCT03679793
Surgical Treatment of Adult Trigger Finger
NCT02196233
Trigger Finger Treatment
NCT03847935
Pull-out Tenolysis Versus Simple A1 Pulley Release in Trigger Digits
NCT06747962
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Longitudinal incision
Incision performed longitudinally
Longitudinal incision
Incision performed longitudinally
Transverse incision
Incision performed transversally
Transverse incision
Incision performed transversally
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Longitudinal incision
Incision performed longitudinally
Transverse incision
Incision performed transversally
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Clinical diagnosis of trigger finger grade II to IV.
Grade I (pre-trigger) Pain, history of entrapment, but not demonstrable on physical examination, tenderness over the A1 pulley.
Grade II (active) Demonstrable entrapment, but the patient can actively extend the finger.
Grade III (passive) Demonstrable entrapment, patient requires passive extension IIIA or inability to actively flex IIIB.
Grade IV (contracture) Demonstrable entrapment with fixed flexion contracture of the PIP.
Exclusion Criteria
* Polydigital
* Allergy to local anesthetics and/or vasoconstrictor agents.
* Previous surgery
* Patients who, in the researcher's opinion, are not good candidates for the study (e.g. inability to comply with the follow-up program, comorbidity, poor physical or mental health in general, drug or alcohol abuse problems...).
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Corporacion Parc Tauli
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Corona Poy
Doctor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Parc taulĂ
Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Mireia
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mohd Rashid MZ, Sapuan J, Abdullah S. A randomized controlled trial of trigger finger release under digital anesthesia with (WALANT) and without adrenaline. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019 Jan-Apr;27(1):2309499019833002. doi: 10.1177/2309499019833002.
Kazmers NH, Holt D, Tyser AR, Wang A, Hutchinson DT. A prospective, randomized clinical trial of transverse versus longitudinal incisions for trigger finger release. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2019 Oct;44(8):810-815. doi: 10.1177/1753193419859375. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
Kloeters O, Ulrich DJ, Bloemsma G, van Houdt CI. Comparison of three different incision techniques in A1 pulley release on scar tissue formation and postoperative rehabilitation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 May;136(5):731-7. doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2430-z. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
A1-LORT
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.