Modulating Inhibitory Control Networks in Gambling Disorder With Theta Burst Stimulation

NCT ID: NCT03669315

Last Updated: 2018-09-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-05-20

Study Completion Date

2019-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this project the investigators propose a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled design in which 40 patients with GD will receive active or sham cTBS to the pre-SMA for 2 weeks. The investigators will combine TMS, multimodal structural and functional MRI and behavioral measures in order to identify circuit-level mechanisms of action and therapeutic targets (connectivity changes that explain clinical improvement) and assess the efficacy of TMS in modulating inhibitory control and symptom severity in this population.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

SPECIFIC AIMS The appropriate interplay of cognitive and reward systems is essential for adaptive human behavior, allowing a homeostatic balance between immediate basic pleasures and long-term planned rewards. Deficits in inhibitory control from cortical cognitive systems over subcortical reward circuits is a key pathophysiological feature of addictive behavior that has not been studied satisfactorily in gambling disorder (GD). The clinical phenotype of this population is characterized by unsuccessful efforts to reduce or stop gambling despite negative outcomes, suggestive of faulty inhibitory control of gambling impulses that sustain the chronicity and comorbidities of this clinical syndrome. Deficits in behavioral and cognitive control constitute a symptom dimension associated with diminished response inhibition in experimental tasks such as the Stop Signal Task (SST). The pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) is a key node of the cognitive control network responsible for response inhibition. Pre-SMA activation has been associated to response inhibition performance in fMRI studies using the SST and recent evidence also suggests that its activity represents a motivational signal for movement. In fact, pre-SMA seems to have a dominant role in bridging the delay between expected reward and specific actions rather than determining whether an action is made. Although the pathophysiology of GD is not well understood, studies have shown altered brain activity in prefrontal regions (including pre-SMA) of GD patients during response inhibition tasks in addition to functional connectivity abnormalities of SMA during rest. These circuit-level abnormalities represent a potential therapeutic target that could be modulated by brain stimulation therapies such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Theta burst stimulation (TBS), is a particularly brief and effective form of TMS that can be inhibitory (continuous or cTBS) or excitatory (intermittent or iTBS). Although pre-SMA has been successfully targeted with traditional TMS and TBS for impulse-control disorders like OCD, this approach has never been tested for GD in therapeutic or mechanistic studies. Despite the significant morbidity and mortality of GD, there is a dramatic shortage of effective treatment options for these patients, partly due to the lack of valid pathophysiological models for target discovery and experimental therapeutics. In this project the investigators propose a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled design in which 40 patients with GD will receive active or sham cTBS to the pre-SMA for 2 weeks. The investigators will combine TMS, multimodal structural and functional MRI and behavioral measures in order to identify circuit-level mechanisms of action and therapeutic targets (connectivity changes that explain clinical improvement) and assess the efficacy of TMS in modulating inhibitory control and symptom severity in this population.

Aim 1 (ACUTE MECHANISM OF ACTION): To assess circuit-level effects of a single session of cTBS to the pre-SMA in GD patients. Hypothesis 1.1: cTBS will lead to increase in functional connectivity between cortical inhibitory nodes (pre-SMA) and reward subcortical structures (Nucleus Accumbens, NAc), and these changes will correlate with improvement in reaction time in SST. Hypothesis 1.2: cTBS will not lead to acute changes in FA, RD or AD in the mesocorticolimbic pathway. Hypothesis 1.3: cTBS will lead to increased cognitive control network and decreased NAc activation during SST. Exploratory analyses will test the predictive value of acute circuit changes for clinical improvement after 2 weeks and 1 month follow up.

Aim 2 (CHRONIC MECHANISM OF ACTION): To assess circuit-level effects of 10 session of cTBS to the pre-SMA in GD patients Hypothesis 2.1: cTBS will lead to increases in functional connectivity between preSMA and NAc, and these will correlate with behavioral and clinical improvement. Hypothesis 2.2: cTBS will lead to increased FA and decreased RD and AD in the mesocorticolimbic pathway, and these will correlate with clinical improvement. Hypothesis 2.3: cTBS will lead to further increased cognitive control network and decreased NAc activation during SST, and these will correlate with clinical improvement.

Aim 3 (BEHAVIORAL/CLINICAL): To determine the behavioral and clinical changes of cTBS to the preSMA in GD. Hypothesis 3.1: A single session of cTBS will lead to improvement in reaction time in the SST, but not in symptom severity measured with clinical scales. Hypothesis 3.2: 10 sessions of cTBS will lead to improvement in reaction time in the behavioral inhibition task, in addition to a reduction in clinical severity (including craving/urges) as measured by clinical scales.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gambling Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

After selection and enrollment, participants will be screened at baseline with MRI and a complete diagnostic and clinical assessment, described in the following corresponding sections. Using a placebo-controlled double-blind design patients will be randomized to receive active or placebo cTBS.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
Outcome assessor, investigators and participants will be blinded to the type of treatment (active TMS or Placebo)

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active cTBS treatment

Active cTBS will be administered with a Magventure MagPro Stimulator R30 using a butterfly coil. TBS consists of bursts of 3 pulses separated by 20ms (i.e. 50 Hz), with each triplet being repeated every 200 ms (i.e. 5 Hz). Stimulus intensities will be set at 80% of AMT. The investigators will use 2 trains of 600 pulses each separated by 1 minute (a total of 1200 pulses).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Transcranial Magnetic stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Neuromodulation tool

Sham cTBS treatment

Sham cTBS will be administered with a Magventure MagPro Stimulator R30 using a butterfly sham coil. The same active cTBS configuration will be used.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Transcranial Magnetic stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Neuromodulation tool

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transcranial Magnetic stimulation

Neuromodulation tool

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. DSM-5 diagnosis of Gambling Disorder
2. Age between 18 and 65 years

Exclusion Criteria

1. any additional current psychiatric comorbidity, except for nicotine addiction;
2. a lifetime DSM-5 diagnosis of schizophrenia or other psychotic syndromes, substance dependence or substance abuse, including alcohol, bipolar I or II disorder, mental disorder due to a general medical condition;
3. serious suicide risk;
4. illness duration less than two years;
5. hospitalization in the last 6 months;
6. the inability to receive TMS because of metallic implants, or history of seizures (personal or family history of seizure in first degree relatives);
7. any major medical disease;
8. pregnancy or nursing of an infant;
9. the inability or refusal to provide written informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

CNS Onlus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Stefano Pallanti

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CNSOnlus, Institute of Neuroscience

Florence, , Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Stefano Pallanti, M.D.

Role: primary

55 587889 ext. 0039

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TMS-GD

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Neuronavigated TBS in Depression
NCT03953521 TERMINATED NA
Rapid Acting Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
NCT04739969 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA