Adenoma Detection Rate With Endocuff-Assisted Colonoscopy - an Italian Trial

NCT ID: NCT03612674

Last Updated: 2018-08-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

2100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-04-04

Study Completion Date

2019-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In European countries, colorectal cancer (CRC) represents an important public health problem. It is widely held view that most carcinomas develop from an adenoma-carcinoma progression.

Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a marker of high quality colonoscopy and it was inversely associated with the risk of interval colorectal cancer, advanced-stage interval cancer, and fatal interval cancer after colonoscopy.

Although colonoscopy is considered the gold standard for adenoma detection, it has shown some limits, so industry has aimed at increasing detection rate of adenomas providing new technologies, most of witch to detect lesions located in blind spots.

ARC Endocuff Vision (AEV), the second generation of Endocuff, represents a new generation of these devices, thus assessing the diagnostic sensibility of ARC Endocuff Vision assisted colonoscopy (EAC) is an interesting challenge.

Aim of the study is to compare ADR of EAC versus standard colonoscopy among FIT positive subjects in the context of CRC screening programs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In European countries, colorectal cancer (CRC) represents an important public health problem. It is widely held view that most carcinomas develop from an adenoma-carcinoma progression.

It has been demonstrated that screening with fecal occult blood test (FOBT) significantly reduces mortality for CRC. Currently, population-based CRC screening programs using FOBT have been or are heading towards being implemented in many European countries. Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has been adopted by most Italian Regions as the standard screening test, with total colonoscopy as diagnostic assessment in subjects resulted FIT positive. A significant impact of FIT-based screening on CRC mortality reduction has been observed in an Italian region after 10 years from screening implementation. Moreover, two studies carried out in a Northern-central area of Italy have shown a reduction in CRC incidence in subjects who attended FIT screening programs as compared to non-attendees.

Increasing colonoscopy quality is critical for the screening impact among population. Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a marker of high quality colonoscopy and it was inversely associated with the risk of interval colorectal cancer, advanced-stage interval cancer, and fatal interval cancer after colonoscopy. ADR is defined as the proportion of colonoscopies during which at least one adenoma can be detected. A polish study showed that ADR was an independent predictor of the risk of interval colorectal cancer after screening colonoscopy. ADR has shown a direct correlation with: operator experience, cecal intubation, quality of bowel preparation, patient sedation, endoscope withdrawal time, presence of flat, depressed or subtle lesions, ability to visualize the proximal side of haustral folds, flexures (blind spots), rectal valves, and ileocecal valves.

On the other hand, colonoscopy is considered the gold standard for adenoma detection, but it has shown some limits. Data from colonoscopy studies showed that up to 25% of polyps were missed during colonoscopy and up to 8% of CRCs occurred within 3 years after a previous colonoscopy. Moreover, recent studies have shown that cancers post-colonoscopy are most likely due to missed lesions, rather than being new lesions.

For these reasons, industry has aimed at increasing detection rate of adenomas providing new technologies, most of witch to detect lesions located in blind spots.

ARC Endocuff Vision (AEV), the second generation of Endocuff, represents a new generation of these devices, thus assessing the diagnostic sensibility of ARC Endocuff Vision assisted colonoscopy (EAC) is an interesting challenge.

Previous researches have studied the performance of colonoscope distal attachment devices. More specifically, a 2016 meta-analysis of more than 5,000 patients demonstrates that, compared to traditional colonoscopy, the use of an Endocuff device improves ADR without any adverse effect on procedural efficiency or increased risk of significant adverse events. Moreover, Facciorusso et al. in 2017 assessed only a modest improvement in ADR by using distal attachment devices, especially in low-performing endoscopists, while in 2018 Williet showed, with moderate-quality evidence, an improvement in ADR with EAC without major adverse events, especially for operators with low-to-moderate ADR.

Second-generation AEV is a soft plastic cap, to be applied on the top of the colonoscopy. The cap has a propylene-made cylindrical core, with a single row of flexible arms. During the colon intubation procedure the device is nearly invisible, while in the retraction phase the arms begin to work, opening up and pulling the colon walls, stretching convoluted tracts.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer Colorectal Adenoma Colorectal Polyp Colorectal Neoplasms

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Subjects will be randomized in two arms: a control-arm and an experimental-arm. Then arms data will be compared.
Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Participants will not be informed about diagnostic procedure in order to evaluate the acceptability of the exam with or without the studied device (in fact at the end of the examination care provider will ask participant about perceived pain during the procedure through the VAS score).

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard colonoscopy (S)

A standard colonoscopy will be performed.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard colonoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Current standard of care colonoscopy.

AEV assisted colonoscopy (E)

Colonoscopy with ARC Endocuff Vision attached to the top of the scope will be performed.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ARC Endocuff Vision

Intervention Type DEVICE

Subjects randomized to undergo a colonoscopy procedure with ARC Endocuff Vision will have this device placed on the top of the colonoscope used during their procedure.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Standard colonoscopy

Current standard of care colonoscopy.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ARC Endocuff Vision

Subjects randomized to undergo a colonoscopy procedure with ARC Endocuff Vision will have this device placed on the top of the colonoscope used during their procedure.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject with a positive FIT result in the frame of national screening program

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects younger than 50 years old
* Active Inflammatory Bowel Disease
* Known condition of cholic stenosis
* Acute diverticulitis
* Patient not able to sign a informed consent form
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

74 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Veneto Tumor Registry, Azienda Zero, Padua, Italy

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Italy

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gianni Amunni, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Oncological Network, Prevention and Research Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Santa Maria del Prato, Local Health Unit 1 Dolomiti, Veneto Region

Feltre, Belluno, Italy

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

San Martino Hospital, Local Health Unit 1 Dolomiti, Veneto Region

Belluno, BL, Italy

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Maggiore Hospital, Crema Territorial Health Care Company, Lombardia Region

Crema, Cremona, Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Cazzavillan Hospital, Local Health Unit 8 Berica, Veneto Region

Arzignano, Vicenza, Italy

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Screening Unit, Oncological Network, Prevention and Research Institute

Florence, , Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

San Paolo Hospital Company - University Campus

Milan, , Italy

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Sant'Antonio Hospital, Local Health Unit 6 Euganea, Veneto Region

Padua, , Italy

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Veneto Tumor Registry, Local Health Unit 4, Veneto Region

Padua, , Italy

Site Status ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Local Health Unit 5 Polesana, Veneto Region

Rovigo, , Italy

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Ca' Foncello Hospital, Local Health Unit 2 Marca Trevigiana, Veneto Region

Treviso, , Italy

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Molinette Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza University Hospital Company

Turin, , Italy

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

San Bonifacio Hospital, Local Health Unit 9 Scaligera, Veneto Region

Verona, , Italy

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Grazia Grazzini, MD

Role: CONTACT

003905532697972

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Flavio Valiante, MD

Role: primary

Bastianello Germanà, MD

Role: primary

Elisabetta Buscarini, MD

Role: primary

Maurizio Pantalena, MD

Role: primary

Grazia Grazzini, MD

Role: primary

Carmelo Luigiano, MD

Role: primary

Erik Rosa Rizzotto, MD

Role: primary

Giuseppe Del Favero, MD

Role: primary

Helena Salvat, MD

Role: primary

Arrigo Arrigoni, MD

Role: primary

Gianmarco Bulighin, MD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Zorzi M, Senore C, Da Re F, Barca A, Bonelli LA, Cannizzaro R, Fasoli R, Di Furia L, Di Giulio E, Mantellini P, Naldoni C, Sassatelli R, Rex D, Hassan C, Zappa M; Equipe Working Group. Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy). Gut. 2015 Sep;64(9):1389-96. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307954. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25227521 (View on PubMed)

Giorgi Rossi P, Vicentini M, Sacchettini C, Di Felice E, Caroli S, Ferrari F, Mangone L, Pezzarossi A, Roncaglia F, Campari C, Sassatelli R, Sacchero R, Sereni G, Paterlini L, Zappa M. Impact of Screening Program on Incidence of Colorectal Cancer: A Cohort Study in Italy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep;110(9):1359-66. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.240. Epub 2015 Aug 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26303133 (View on PubMed)

Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, Zhao WK, Lee JK, Doubeni CA, Zauber AG, de Boer J, Fireman BH, Schottinger JE, Quinn VP, Ghai NR, Levin TR, Quesenberry CP. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 3;370(14):1298-306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1309086.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24693890 (View on PubMed)

Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M, Wojciechowska U, Didkowska J, Zwierko M, Rupinski M, Nowacki MP, Butruk E. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 May 13;362(19):1795-803. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907667.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20463339 (View on PubMed)

Munroe CA, Lee P, Copland A, Wu KK, Kaltenbach T, Soetikno RM, Friedland S. A tandem colonoscopy study of adenoma miss rates during endoscopic training: a venture into uncharted territory. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar;75(3):561-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.11.037.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22341103 (View on PubMed)

Faiss S. The missed colorectal cancer problem. Dig Dis. 2011;29 Suppl 1:60-3. doi: 10.1159/000331119. Epub 2011 Nov 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22104756 (View on PubMed)

Rees CJ, Rajasekhar PT, Rutter MD, Dekker E. Quality in colonoscopy: European perspectives and practice. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Jan;8(1):29-47. doi: 10.1586/17474124.2014.858599. Epub 2013 Dec 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24410471 (View on PubMed)

van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM, van Deventer SJ, Dekker E. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;101(2):343-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00390.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16454841 (View on PubMed)

Leufkens AM, van Oijen MG, Vleggaar FP, Siersema PD. Factors influencing the miss rate of polyps in a back-to-back colonoscopy study. Endoscopy. 2012 May;44(5):470-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291666. Epub 2012 Mar 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22441756 (View on PubMed)

Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, Rahmani EY, Clark DW, Helper DJ, Lehman GA, Mark DG. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology. 1997 Jan;112(1):24-8. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(97)70214-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8978338 (View on PubMed)

Pullens HJ, Siersema PD. Quality indicators for colonoscopy: Current insights and caveats. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Dec 16;6(12):571-83. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i12.571.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25512766 (View on PubMed)

le Clercq CM, Bouwens MW, Rondagh EJ, Bakker CM, Keulen ET, de Ridder RJ, Winkens B, Masclee AA, Sanduleanu S. Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers are preventable: a population-based study. Gut. 2014 Jun;63(6):957-63. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-304880. Epub 2013 Jun 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23744612 (View on PubMed)

Pohl H, Robertson DJ. Colorectal cancers detected after colonoscopy frequently result from missed lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Oct;8(10):858-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.06.028. Epub 2010 Jul 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20655393 (View on PubMed)

Chin M, Karnes W, Jamal MM, Lee JG, Lee R, Samarasena J, Bechtold ML, Nguyen DL. Use of the Endocuff during routine colonoscopy examination improves adenoma detection: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov 21;22(43):9642-9649. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i43.9642.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27920485 (View on PubMed)

Facciorusso A, Del Prete V, Buccino RV, Della Valle N, Nacchiero MC, Monica F, Cannizzaro R, Muscatiello N. Comparative Efficacy of Colonoscope Distal Attachment Devices in Increasing Rates of Adenoma Detection: A Network Meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Aug;16(8):1209-1219.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Nov 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29133257 (View on PubMed)

Williet N, Tournier Q, Vernet C, Dumas O, Rinaldi L, Roblin X, Phelip JM, Pioche M. Effect of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma detection rate: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endoscopy. 2018 Sep;50(9):846-860. doi: 10.1055/a-0577-3500. Epub 2018 Apr 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29698990 (View on PubMed)

Zorzi M, Hassan C, Battagello J, Antonelli G, Pantalena M, Bulighin G, Alicante S, Meggiato T, Rosa-Rizzotto E, Iacopini F, Luigiano C, Monica F, Arrigoni A, Germana B, Valiante F, Mallardi B, Senore C, Grazzini G, Mantellini P; ItaVision Working Group. Adenoma detection by Endocuff-assisted versus standard colonoscopy in an organized screening program: the "ItaVision" randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2022 Feb;54(2):138-147. doi: 10.1055/a-1379-6868. Epub 2021 Apr 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33524994 (View on PubMed)

Study Documents

Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.

Document Type: Analytic Code

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

F17G18000000007

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.