Impact of Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) as Second Reader in CT Colonography
NCT ID: NCT01399710
Last Updated: 2011-07-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
651 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-07-31
2010-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PURPOSE:This clinical trial compared the performance of CT colonography with unassisted and CAD-assisted reading in detecting patients with colorectal lesions.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Japanese National Computed Tomographic (CT) Colonography Trial
NCT00997802
Role of Computer-Aided Detection Colonoscopy in Polyp Detection Rate
NCT07171333
Efficacy of CAD in Screening Colonoscopy to Reduce the Risk of Advanced Adenoma at 3 Years.
NCT07299071
Adenoma Detection Rate Using Endocuff Vision in China
NCT03839277
A Multi Center Study Comparing the Efficacy of CAD EYE and the Standard of Care (White Light )
NCT05523271
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CT colonography
Participants were placed on a CT table and a small flexible rectal catheter was positioned. N-butyl-scopolamine was administered intravenously if this was common practice in the participating center. Immediately before scanning, pneumocolon was obtained through insufflation of room air or carbon dioxide, either manually by means of a balloon pump or with an automatic device, until maximum tolerance was reached. CT colonography was performed with the participant in supine and prone positions with the following scanning protocol: 120 kilovolt peak (kVp), 50 or fewer effective mA per second, and a section thickness not greater than 1.25 mm.
colonoscopy
Colonoscopy was performed at least 3 hours after CT colonography. The endoscope was advanced to the cecum and the entire length of the bowel was examined during endoscope withdrawal. The endoscopist was initially blinded to the result of CT colonography; at the end of each bowel segment evaluation, CT colonography results for that segment were disclosed (segmental unblinding). If a lesion measuring 6 mm or larger was detected at CT colonography but not at colonoscopy, the segment was reexamined to resolve the discrepancy
CT Colonography with computer assisted diagnosis (CAD),CADCOLON -im3D SpA., Torino Italy
Each CT colonography study was read in two phases. In the first phase the radiologist interpreted the examination without activating the CAD algorithm. This phase of reporting was defined as unassisted reading. Then the radiologist activated the CAD algorithm which pinpointed a series of colorectal lesion-like structures (i.e. lesion candidates) on both the prone and supine acquisition. All lesion candidates were examined. The second phase of reporting was defined as CAD-assisted reading.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* inflammatory bowel disease
* celiac disease
* evidence of increased risk of harm from colonoscopy
* psychological or physical conditions that contraindicated colonoscopy or CT Colonography
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Candiolo Cancer Institute - IRCCS
OTHER
Bicocca Universiy of Milano, Milan, Italy
UNKNOWN
Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri
OTHER
Catholic University, Italy
OTHER
Valduce Hospital
OTHER
University of Turin, Italy
OTHER
University of Roma La Sapienza
OTHER
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
OTHER
Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital
OTHER
University of Pisa
OTHER
University of Florence
OTHER
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino - IST Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy
OTHER
im3D S.p.A.
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Institute of Cancer Research and Treatment, Candiolo - Italy
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Daniele Regge
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Institute Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment, Candiolo, Italy
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Regge D, Della Monica P, Galatola G, Laudi C, Zambon A, Correale L, Asnaghi R, Barbaro B, Borghi C, Campanella D, Cassinis MC, Ferrari R, Ferraris A, Hassan C, Golfieri R, Iafrate F, Iussich G, Laghi A, Massara R, Neri E, Sali L, Venturini S, Gandini G. Efficacy of computer-aided detection as a second reader for 6-9-mm lesions at CT colonography: multicenter prospective trial. Radiology. 2013 Jan;266(1):168-76. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120376. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CAD COLON 001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.