Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-09-12
2024-09-12
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Finally, based on the importance of complete resection of the colonic mucosal lesions, namely suspicious high-grade dysplasia or early invasive cancer, the investigators aimed to assess the accuracy of CAD-Eye™ in the detection of remaining lesions after the procedure.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing Detection of Standard Colonoscopy, CAD-EYE and Combined CAD-EYE and G-EYE® Aided Colonoscopy
NCT05237310
Artificial Intelligence in the Characterization of Colorectal Polyps
NCT04749277
Evaluation of CAD-EYE/SCALE-EYE for Detection, Classification, and Measurement of Colorectal Polyps: a Prospective Study
NCT05236790
Computer-aided Detection During Screening Colonoscopy (Experts)
NCT04915833
Computer-aided Detection During Screening Colonoscopy
NCT05734820
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Based on the above, many newly diagnostic techniques guided by artificial intelligence (AI), currently proposed to improve the polyp detection rate during colonoscopy, can be applied for the detection of remaining lesions after endoscopic treatment.
CAD-Eye™ is CADx for polyp detection and characterization. It improves polyp visualization by using techniques such as blue-laser imaging (BLI-LASER), blue-light imaging (BLI-LED), and linked-color imaging (LCI). This device aimed to improve real-time polyp detection, helping experts identify multiple polyps simultaneously and common inadvertently missed lesions (flat lesions, polyps in difficult areas).
CAD-Eye™ had demonstrated in previous studies an accuracy of 89% to 91.7% in polyp detection. However, few studies had demonstrated its performance in the detection of remaining lesions after EMR. The investigators aimed to take advantage of this system in the detection of remaining lesions immediately after EMR and in its endoscopic control after three months.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Endoscopic mucosal resection + CAD-Eye™
This group constitutes patients with lesions suggestive of high-grade dysplasia or early invasive cancer approached with endoscopic mucosal resection, subjected to colonoscopy + CAD-Eye™ system evaluation for the detection of remaining malignant tissue.
For this group, the investigators used as a complement tool an AI system (CAD-Eye™) for the detection of remaining lesions immediately after EMR and in a three-month follow-up.
EMR with CAD-Eye™
Patients of group 1 undergoing Intervention 1 are subjected to an EMR with CAD-Eye™ to detect the remaining lesions immediately after the endoscopic procedure.
The suspected remaining lesions in the post-procedure defect detected with CAD-Eye™ are removed and sent to pathology to confirm the diagnosis.
Follow-up colonoscopy with CAD-Eye™
Patients undergoing Interventions 1 and 2, with a previous EMR, are assigned for a three-month follow-up using the CAD-Eye™ as a complementary procedure to detect remaining lesions.
For the detection of residual lesions, the colonoscope with the CAD-Eye™ assistance is used during the post-procedural scar evaluation. Suspicious lesions detected are removed and sent to pathology for final diagnosis.
Endoscopic mucosal resection without CAD Eye
This group constitutes patients with lesions suggestive of high-grade dysplasia or early invasive cancer approached with endoscopic mucosal resection and subjected to colonoscopy. The detection of remaining lesions immediately after EMR is based on the visual impression of the expert.
For this group, the investigators used as a complement tool an AI system (CAD-Eye™) only for the evaluation of the post-procedure scar to detect remaining lesions in the three-month follow-up.
EMR without CAD-Eye™
Patients of group 2, undergoing intervention 2, subjected to an EMR alone. The immediate detection of remaining lesions is based on the visual impression of the expert.
The suspected remaining lesions in the post-procedure defect are removed and sent to pathology to confirm the diagnosis.
Follow-up colonoscopy with CAD-Eye™
Patients undergoing Interventions 1 and 2, with a previous EMR, are assigned for a three-month follow-up using the CAD-Eye™ as a complementary procedure to detect remaining lesions.
For the detection of residual lesions, the colonoscope with the CAD-Eye™ assistance is used during the post-procedural scar evaluation. Suspicious lesions detected are removed and sent to pathology for final diagnosis.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
EMR with CAD-Eye™
Patients of group 1 undergoing Intervention 1 are subjected to an EMR with CAD-Eye™ to detect the remaining lesions immediately after the endoscopic procedure.
The suspected remaining lesions in the post-procedure defect detected with CAD-Eye™ are removed and sent to pathology to confirm the diagnosis.
EMR without CAD-Eye™
Patients of group 2, undergoing intervention 2, subjected to an EMR alone. The immediate detection of remaining lesions is based on the visual impression of the expert.
The suspected remaining lesions in the post-procedure defect are removed and sent to pathology to confirm the diagnosis.
Follow-up colonoscopy with CAD-Eye™
Patients undergoing Interventions 1 and 2, with a previous EMR, are assigned for a three-month follow-up using the CAD-Eye™ as a complementary procedure to detect remaining lesions.
For the detection of residual lesions, the colonoscope with the CAD-Eye™ assistance is used during the post-procedural scar evaluation. Suspicious lesions detected are removed and sent to pathology for final diagnosis.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who authorize EMR and colonoscopy.
* Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Poor bowel preparation score defined as the total Boston bowel preparation score (BBPS) \<6 and the right-segment score \<2
* Patients with more than one previous EMR
* Lost on a three-month follow-up after EMR
* Pregnancy or nursing
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Carlos Robles-Medranda
Head of the Endoscopy Division
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Carlos Robles-Medranda, MD FASGE
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas (IECED)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Carlos Robles-Medranda
Guayaquil, Guayas, Ecuador
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kliegis L, Obst W, Bruns J, Weigt J. Can a Polyp Detection and Characterization System Predict Complete Resection? Dig Dis. 2022;40(1):115-118. doi: 10.1159/000516974. Epub 2021 May 6.
Yoshida N, Inoue K, Tomita Y, Kobayashi R, Hashimoto H, Sugino S, Hirose R, Dohi O, Yasuda H, Morinaga Y, Inada Y, Murakami T, Zhu X, Itoh Y. An analysis about the function of a new artificial intelligence, CAD EYE with the lesion recognition and diagnosis for colorectal polyps in clinical practice. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Oct;36(10):2237-2245. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-04006-5. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
Dumoulin FL, Hildenbrand R. Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan 21;25(3):300-307. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i3.300.
Neumann H, Kreft A, Sivanathan V, Rahman F, Galle PR. Evaluation of novel LCI CAD EYE system for real time detection of colon polyps. PLoS One. 2021 Aug 26;16(8):e0255955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255955. eCollection 2021.
Min M, Deng P, Zhang W, Sun X, Liu Y, Nong B. Comparison of linked color imaging and white-light colonoscopy for detection of colorectal polyps: a multicenter, randomized, crossover trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Oct;86(4):724-730. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.02.035. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
Tate DJ, Desomer L, Klein A, Brown G, Hourigan LF, Lee EY, Moss A, Ormonde D, Raftopoulos S, Singh R, Williams SJ, Zanati S, Byth K, Bourke MJ. Adenoma recurrence after piecemeal colonic EMR is predictable: the Sydney EMR recurrence tool. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Mar;85(3):647-656.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.11.027. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IECED-08202022
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.