Comparing Two Types of Needle for Oocytes Retrieval

NCT ID: NCT03611907

Last Updated: 2022-09-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-03-06

Study Completion Date

2021-01-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In the early stages of assisted reproductive technologies (ART), oocyte retrieval was performed via laparoscopy, a cumbersome and expensive process requiring general anesthesia. Today, transvaginal oocyte retrieval for ART is a routine procedure performed under ultrasound guidance. Double-lumen retrieval needles, which are capable of flushing ovarian follicles, were developed to overcome the possibility of oocyte retention within the ovarian follicles and retrieval collection system. Single lumen needles have been introduced and are routinely used by most groups due to their supposed ability to retrieve the same number of oocytes in a shorter operation time.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

After a long period in which Humanitas department used double lumen needles for oocytes retrieval in the last four years the choice of the needle is an operator choice, usually influenced by the number of follicles present at human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) trigger.

This prospective randomized controlled clinical trial is designed to highlight differences between Double Lumen Aspiration Needle and Single Lumen Needle commonly used in Humanitas' clinical practice primarly in terms of number of retrived oocytes per procedure (A). Secondary outcomes are the number of punctured follicles (B), the retrieval rate (%) (A/B), the number of follicles at the last ultrasound performed prior to the ovulation trigger (C), the number of retrieved oocytes / number of follicles at trigger-day (A/C), retrieval procedure time (D), single oocyte retrieval time (D/A), the number of mature oocytes (and MII) and complications rate. Number of transferred embryos, number of frozen embryos and oocytes, clinical pregnancy rate per retrieval and per transfer (considering the number of pregnancies diagnosed by US visualization of one or more gestational sacs or definitive clinical signs of pregnancy per 100 cycles) and total number of clinical pregnancies with fetal heart beat (confirmed by visualization of one or more embryos with heartbeat at early dating ultrasound), are also evaluated. Standard protocols will be used for controlled ovarian hyper stimulation. Trans vaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval will be performed 36 hours ± 2 after hCG injection with the patient under deep sedation.

One hundred patients per each needle will be enrolled in this trial.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infertility, Female ART

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

prospective randomized controlled clinical trial is designed to highlight differences between Double Lumen Aspiration Needle and Single Lumen Needle commonly used in clinical practice primarly in terms of number of retrieved oocytes per procedure.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SL1(Cook® Single Lumen)

Oocyte retrieval with only aspiration system

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Oocyte retrieval with only aspiration system "SL1(Cook® Single Lumen)"

Intervention Type DEVICE

In this intervention a 17-Gauge needle is used to aspirate the follicles

DL1 (Cook® EchoTip® Double Lumen)

Oocyte retrieval with aspiration and flushing system

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Oocyte retrieval with aspiration and flushing system "DL1 (Cook® EchoTip® Double Lumen)"

Intervention Type DEVICE

In this intervention a 17-Gauge needle is used to aspirate follicle, and consequently a 1 mL flush is injected and aspirated twice for each punctured follicle

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Oocyte retrieval with only aspiration system "SL1(Cook® Single Lumen)"

In this intervention a 17-Gauge needle is used to aspirate the follicles

Intervention Type DEVICE

Oocyte retrieval with aspiration and flushing system "DL1 (Cook® EchoTip® Double Lumen)"

In this intervention a 17-Gauge needle is used to aspirate follicle, and consequently a 1 mL flush is injected and aspirated twice for each punctured follicle

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* IVF/ intracytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles;

Exclusion Criteria

* Ovarian Endometriomas;
* Severe previous pelvic inflammatory disease with frozen pelvis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

42 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Istituto Clinico Humanitas

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Paolo Emanuele Levi Setti

Rozzano, MI, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ronchetti C, Cirillo F, Immediata V, Gargasole C, Scolaro V, Morenghi E, Albani E, Patrizio P, Levi-Setti PE. A Monocentric Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Compare Single- and Double-Lumen Needles in Oocyte Retrieval Procedure in Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Reprod Sci. 2023 Sep;30(9):2866-2875. doi: 10.1007/s43032-023-01232-w. Epub 2023 Apr 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37069472 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1965

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Personalized Insemination Treatment Study
NCT03830723 COMPLETED PHASE2