Individualized vs Low PEEP in One Lung Ventilation

NCT ID: NCT03569774

Last Updated: 2021-07-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-08-14

Study Completion Date

2021-05-19

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the prospective crossover study is to investigate the effect of individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on measures of tissue oxygenation, compared with low PEEP.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

During surgery on the lung, ventilation of one lung at a time is often necessary. During thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation (OLV), hypoxemia (reduced oxygen tension in blood) can present a clinical challenge. Due to multiple factors, the likelihood of hypoxemia during OLV in obese patients is increased. Atelectasis (collapse of the lung airspaces) contributes to hypoxemia and can be mitigated by application of recruitment maneuvers and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). A recruitment maneuver is a breath given in a mechanically ventilated patient that helps to open up collapsed air spaces, and PEEP is application of a continuous amount of positive pressure that helps keep the air spaces open at the end of an exhaled breath. Adjusting the level of PEEP to each individual patient's optimal lung compliance (individualized PEEP) improves blood oxygen levels compared to application of standard low PEEP (5 cmH2O); however, higher levels of PEEP required to achieve optimal lung compliance could increase intrathoracic pressures to a level that impedes normal circulation. This could negatively affect blood flow (cardiac output) and delivery of oxgyen to vital organs.

Evidence addressing OLV in obese patients is lacking. The purpose of this study is to compare brain oxygen levels (cerebral oxygen saturation) and measures of blood flow and gas exchange during OLV with individualized PEEP vs low standard PEEP in obese patients undergoing thoracic surgery. To our knowledge, there is no previous study that compares oxygen delivery to vital organs (such as the brain) during OLV using individualized PEEP versus standard low PEEP, in an obese patient population.

In this study, subjects undergoing OLV during surgery to remove a portion of the lung (lobectomy) will undergo a process to determine their individualized PEEP and then two 20-minute experimental periods-- one period with OLV with low PEEP and one period with OLV with individualized PEEP. Measurements of cerebral oxygen saturation, blood oxygen levels, cardiac output, and blood pressure medication dose will be measuring before and after these experimental periods during surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

One-Lung Ventilation Obesity Lung Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Mechanical ventilation with individualized PEEP will be compared to mechanical ventilating with low PEEP during lung isolation in each subject. Each subject will receive one PEEP level then will receive the second PEEP level. The order in which each subject receives the PEEP level will be randomized.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Individualized PEEP

Individualized PEEP will be identified by performing a decremental PEEP protocol which will determine the level of PEEP that correlates with maximal lung compliance in each subject. Subjects will receive one-lung ventilation with individualized PEEP

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

One-lung ventilation with individualized PEEP

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

During one-lung ventilation for lung resection surgery, PEEP will be applied. After a subject's individualized PEEP (PEEP that corresponds to maximum lung compliance) is determined, the subject will receive one-lung ventilation with individualized PEEP.

Low PEEP

Subjects will receive One-lung ventilation with low PEEP (5 cmH2O)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

One-lung ventilation with low PEEP

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Subjects will receive one-lung ventilation with low PEEP (5 cmH2O)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

One-lung ventilation with individualized PEEP

During one-lung ventilation for lung resection surgery, PEEP will be applied. After a subject's individualized PEEP (PEEP that corresponds to maximum lung compliance) is determined, the subject will receive one-lung ventilation with individualized PEEP.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

One-lung ventilation with low PEEP

Subjects will receive one-lung ventilation with low PEEP (5 cmH2O)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Subject undergoing elective pulmonary lobectomy requiring one-lung ventilation
2. Body-mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2
3. Age ≥ 18 years and ≤ 80 years

Exclusion Criteria

1. Age ≤ 18 year or ≥ 80 years
2. Moderate or severe cardiac valvular disease
3. Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 30%
4. Moderate or severe right ventricular systolic dysfunction
5. Severe pulmonary hypertension
6. Presence of pulmonary bullae or blebs on preoperative chest imaging studies (e.g., radiograph, computed tomograph)
7. Emergency surgery
8. Previous history of lung surgery on the non-operative lung
9. Pregnancy
10. Incarceration
11. Mental incapacitation
12. Patient refusal
13. Non-English speaking
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dionne Peacher

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dionne Peacher

Clinical Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dionne Peacher, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Iowa

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Campos JH, Feider A. Hypoxia During One-Lung Ventilation-A Review and Update. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018 Oct;32(5):2330-2338. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.12.026. Epub 2017 Dec 19. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29361458 (View on PubMed)

Karzai W, Schwarzkopf K. Hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation: prediction, prevention, and treatment. Anesthesiology. 2009 Jun;110(6):1402-11. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819fb15d.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19417615 (View on PubMed)

Ferrando C, Mugarra A, Gutierrez A, Carbonell JA, Garcia M, Soro M, Tusman G, Belda FJ. Setting individualized positive end-expiratory pressure level with a positive end-expiratory pressure decrement trial after a recruitment maneuver improves oxygenation and lung mechanics during one-lung ventilation. Anesth Analg. 2014 Mar;118(3):657-65. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000105.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24557111 (View on PubMed)

de Matos GF, Stanzani F, Passos RH, Fontana MF, Albaladejo R, Caserta RE, Santos DC, Borges JB, Amato MB, Barbas CS. How large is the lung recruitability in early acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective case series of patients monitored by computed tomography. Crit Care. 2012 Jan 8;16(1):R4. doi: 10.1186/cc10602.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22226331 (View on PubMed)

Borges JB, Okamoto VN, Matos GF, Caramez MP, Arantes PR, Barros F, Souza CE, Victorino JA, Kacmarek RM, Barbas CS, Carvalho CR, Amato MB. Reversibility of lung collapse and hypoxemia in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Aug 1;174(3):268-78. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200506-976OC. Epub 2006 May 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16690982 (View on PubMed)

Writing Group for the Alveolar Recruitment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trial (ART) Investigators; Cavalcanti AB, Suzumura EA, Laranjeira LN, Paisani DM, Damiani LP, Guimaraes HP, Romano ER, Regenga MM, Taniguchi LNT, Teixeira C, Pinheiro de Oliveira R, Machado FR, Diaz-Quijano FA, Filho MSA, Maia IS, Caser EB, Filho WO, Borges MC, Martins PA, Matsui M, Ospina-Tascon GA, Giancursi TS, Giraldo-Ramirez ND, Vieira SRR, Assef MDGPL, Hasan MS, Szczeklik W, Rios F, Amato MBP, Berwanger O, Ribeiro de Carvalho CR. Effect of Lung Recruitment and Titrated Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) vs Low PEEP on Mortality in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1335-1345. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14171.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28973363 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

201805831

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.