Assessing Respiratory Rate and Tidal Volume Delivery During Manual Ventilation

NCT ID: NCT03544164

Last Updated: 2019-09-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

52 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-05-07

Study Completion Date

2019-07-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Excessive minute ventilation for patients who experience cardiac arrest may cause pulmonary injury and decrease the overall effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Although clinicians are trained with the correct technique for manual ventilation, evidence still shows that clinicians tend to deliver a higher respiratory rate than recommended during CPR. Little is known about tidal volume delivery during CPR; either the amount of volume give or even the impact of tidal volume on the effectiveness of CPR. There are many factors that may influence variations of tidal volumes and RR during CPR. These factors include distractions in the room (noise/cross talk), inability to assess tidal volume delivery, anxiety, and stress of the situation. This study will evaluate tidal volume and respiratory rate (RR) delivery during a simulated CPR situation. Participants will be asked to provide care for an intubated adult patient in cardiac arrest, which will include all components of advanced cardiac life support training.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This will be a cross-sectional study, conducted during regularly scheduled ACLS courses at Rush University Medical Center. Enrollment will be by random assignment as participants arrive for the ACLS course. Those that consent to the study will be informed that the investigator's study is to observe ACLS performance, but the exact parameters being measured will not be disclosed in an effort to mitigate any changes in behaviors.

During the course of the study, groups will be assigned sequentially, and the first group to participate will be termed as "Group 1". Within the group, each participant will be assigned a letter to identify the sequence of rotation with the skills. For example, the first participant in group 1 to perform manual ventilation will be assigned the study identity of "1A". The second person in the first group will be "1B", and so on.

During the ACLS megacode component of the ACLS training, each study participant will be given the opportunity to manually ventilate the simulated intubated adult patient, as per the normal rotation during a megacode. During the megacode, information will be collected via the NICO2 Respiratory Management System (Philips Respironics, Murrysville, Pennsylvania) that is attached to the endotracheal tube, which will be video recorded, as this system does not have function of data storage or downloaded. This is to assure each breath is captured so the study team can assure accuracy of data collection. None of the study participants will be video recorded.

At the completion of the study, each participant will be debriefed on their performance and informed of the true nature of the study; which is to evaluate respiratory rate and tidal volume delivery during manual ventilation to an intubated patient during an ACLS rescue attempt.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Advanced Cardiac Life Support, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Tidal Volume, Manual Ventilation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Manual Ventilation

Manual ventilation via endotracheal tube using adult manual resuscitation device

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 21 years old or older
* licensed clinician, regardless of medical profession

Exclusion Criteria

* Full-time, non-licensed students that have no completed their formal training program at Rush University
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rush University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Brady Scott

Assistant Professor, Director of Clinical Education

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rush University Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

18020603

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Effects of End-inspiratory Pause on Ventilation
NCT06692634 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA