Impact of Home Exercise Delivery on Compliance & Outcomes for Musculoskeletal Pain
NCT ID: NCT03470753
Last Updated: 2020-01-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
116 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-01-12
2019-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Low-Cost Tool for Compliance and Treatment-Tracking of Low Back Pain Patients
NCT03478007
Functional Rehabilitation Effects on Exercise-induced Hypoalgesia in Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT07347457
SMART Stepped Care Management for Low Back Pain in the Military Health System
NCT04172038
A Follow-up Comparison of Active Versus Passive Manual Therapy in Patients With Low Back Pain
NCT03758807
Improvement in Pain,Function and HRQoL ( Health Related Quality of Life) in Subacute Low Back Pain: A Controlled Clinical Trial of Exercise vs NSAIDs (Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory)
NCT01374269
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Exercise Amount
Phase 1: 2 or 4 exercises.
Number of Exercises
Subjects will receive either 2 or 4 exercises to evaluate the short-term recall and performance.
Type of Instruction
The type of instruction in phase 1 will be compared: Instruction by providing a handout only vs being instructed by a provider and practiced by the patient with provider feedback.
Type of instruction
Phase 1: Handout on paper versus handout and visual demonstration/performance.
Number of Exercises
Subjects will receive either 2 or 4 exercises to evaluate the short-term recall and performance.
Type of Instruction
The type of instruction in phase 1 will be compared: Instruction by providing a handout only vs being instructed by a provider and practiced by the patient with provider feedback.
Delivery Type
Phase 2: Handout vs electronic delivery
Delivery Type
In phase 2 subjects will be provided 4 exercises using only a handout vs delivered to them electronically with the addition of a video.
Mobile Reminder
A text-message based mobile reminder tool will be utilized to engage with subjects via texting on a daily basis to provide reminders and encouragement to perform their home exercises.
Reminder Type
Phase 2: Mobile reminders vs no mobile reminders
Delivery Type
In phase 2 subjects will be provided 4 exercises using only a handout vs delivered to them electronically with the addition of a video.
Mobile Reminder
A text-message based mobile reminder tool will be utilized to engage with subjects via texting on a daily basis to provide reminders and encouragement to perform their home exercises.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Number of Exercises
Subjects will receive either 2 or 4 exercises to evaluate the short-term recall and performance.
Type of Instruction
The type of instruction in phase 1 will be compared: Instruction by providing a handout only vs being instructed by a provider and practiced by the patient with provider feedback.
Delivery Type
In phase 2 subjects will be provided 4 exercises using only a handout vs delivered to them electronically with the addition of a video.
Mobile Reminder
A text-message based mobile reminder tool will be utilized to engage with subjects via texting on a daily basis to provide reminders and encouragement to perform their home exercises.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. The current episode for the injury is 6 weeks or greater
3. A home exercise program is appropriate as part of the management plan for their injury on the first day
4. Between the age of 18 and 65 years.
5. Own and utilize a smart phone
6. Read and speak English well enough to interact with the smart phone-based tool.
7. Able and willing to come in for follow-up at 1-month.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Already receiving or have received treatment for this episode of pain within the past 6 months.
3. Medical "red flags" of a potentially serious condition including cauda equina syndrome, major or rapidly progressing neurological deficit, fracture, malignancy, joint infection, or systemic disease
4. If participating with low back pain, known current pregnancy or history of pregnancy in the last 6 months
5. Exiting military health system in the next 2 months, pending litigation, or pending a medical separation board.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dan Rhon
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dan Rhon
Researcher
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Daniel Rhon, DSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Brooke Army Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Brooke Army Medical Center
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jordan JL, Holden MA, Mason EE, Foster NE. Interventions to improve adherence to exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD005956. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005956.pub2.
Bollen JC, Dean SG, Siegert RJ, Howe TE, Goodwin VA. A systematic review of measures of self-reported adherence to unsupervised home-based rehabilitation exercise programmes, and their psychometric properties. BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 27;4(6):e005044. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005044.
Chou R, Huffman LH; American Pain Society; American College of Physicians. Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):492-504. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00007.
Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Tomlinson G. Systematic review: strategies for using exercise therapy to improve outcomes in chronic low back pain. Ann Intern Med. 2005 May 3;142(9):776-85. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-9-200505030-00014.
Jack K, McLean SM, Moffett JK, Gardiner E. Barriers to treatment adherence in physiotherapy outpatient clinics: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2010 Jun;15(3):220-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2009.12.004. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
Holcomb LS. A Taxonomic Integrative Review of Short Message Service (SMS) Methodology: A Framework for Improved Diabetic Outcomes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Apr 30;9(6):1321-6. doi: 10.1177/1932296815585132.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
C.2017.093d
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.