Validation of a Nutrient Profiling System for Reformulation

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

6991 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-01-01

Study Completion Date

2017-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objectives of the study are to assess the validity of Nestlé reformulation criteria in two national dietary surveys: the US NHANES 2011, and the French INCA2 2006-07.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

An Intervention to Develop Interface Tools for Nutrigenomics

NCT03310814

Adult

UNKNOWN NA

Validation of a Diet Risk Screening Tool

NCT03805373

Nutrition Diet Modification Preventive Medicine +2 more

COMPLETED

Human Intervention Study for Validating Foods With Improved Nutrient Profile

NCT04113837

Cardiovascular Risk Factor

COMPLETED NA

Dietary Analyses in the Nurses' Health Study, Nurses' Health Study II, and Health Professionals Follow-Up Study

NCT03366532

Type2 Diabetes Coronary Artery Disease Morality +1 more

COMPLETED

Establishing and Validating a Meal-provoked Intestinal Permeability Test for Nutritional and Metabolic Health Clinical Research.

NCT07066176

Intestinal Permeability

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: The Nestlé Nutritional Profiling System (NNPS) has been developed to guide food and beverage reformulation. It is not known whether products passing the NNPS standards have a higher overall nutritional density, and whether the higher consumption of NNPS Pass products is associated with a higher dietary quality.

Objective: The objectives were (i) to compare the classifications derived from the NNPS and the validated UK Ofcom nutrient profiling system; and (ii) to assess the NNPS construct validity against healthy and unhealthy diets in French (Individual and National Survey on food Consumption 2006-2007) and the US (National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2011-2012) nationally representative dietary surveys.

Design: NNPS outcomes (PASS, FAIL, Out-of-scope) of foods were compared to UK Ofcom outcomes. Contributions of NNPS outcomes to energy intakes were compared between diets nutritional quality classes defined by two methods: based on a food-based quality indicator (PNNS-GS in France, HEI-2010 in the US), or on a combination of three nutrient-based indicators (MAR, MER, energy density).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Nutrition Poor

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

INCA2 2006-07

French National Dietary Intake Survey, conducted in 2006-2007 by the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health Safety.

Adults aged 18y and over, n=1918 included in the analyses.

Diet and socio-demographic questionnaires

Intervention Type OTHER

24-hr recall or food diary questionnaires; socio-demographic questionnaires

NHANES 2011-12

Wave 2011-12 of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, the US national dietary intake Survey, conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Adults aged 18y and over, n=5073 included in the analyses.