An Intervention to Develop Interface Tools for Nutrigenomics

NCT ID: NCT03310814

Last Updated: 2017-10-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

57 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-03-15

Study Completion Date

2017-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study compares the efficacy of a non-practitioner assisted direct-to-consumer (DTC) self-driven approach to nutrigenomics versus a personalized practitioner-led method. The secondary aims are to use this data combined with participant feedback to generate more effective nutrigenomics-based products.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

While nutrition is a widely accepted tool for the prevention of long-term health conditions, current approaches have not adequately reduced chronic disease morbidity. Nutrigenomics has great potential, however, it is complicated to implement. There is a need for products, derived from nutrigenomics, which are easily understood, accessible and utilized. The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of a non-practitioner assisted direct-to-consumer (DTC) self-driven approach to nutrigenomics versus a personalized practitioner-led method. The secondary aims are to use this data combined with participant feedback to generate more effective nutrigenomics-based products.

Methods:

This 4-month study used a mixed-methods design that included: 1) a phase 1 randomized control trial that examined the effectiveness of a multi-faceted, nutrition-based gene test (components assessed included the major nutrients, food tolerances, food taste and preferences, and vitamins) in changing health behaviours; followed by 2) qualitative investigation that explored participants' experiences. The study recruited 57 healthy males and females (35-55 years) randomized as a 2:1 ratio where 38 received the intervention (gene-test results plus personalized nutrition report) and 19 were assigned to the control group (gene-test results report emailed). Both groups received follow-up emails with nutrition-related tips and reminders. The primary outcomes of interest measures included changes in diet (nutrients, healthy eating index), self-efficacy, quality of life and anthropometrics (BMI, waist:hip) measured at baseline, post-intervention (3 and 6 weeks), and the final visit. After the study has been completed, participants in the control group will also receive their personalized nutrition report.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Adult

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Personalized nutrition intervention

Participant receives gene-test results plus personalized nutrition information from a registered dietician

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Personalized nutrition

Intervention Type OTHER

Receives individualized nutrition information

Usual nutrigenomics intervention

Participant receives usual nutrigenomics intervention (direct-to-consumer)

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Personalized nutrition

Intervention Type OTHER

Receives individualized nutrition information

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Personalized nutrition

Receives individualized nutrition information

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Adults, aged 35-55 years.
2. Ability to understand sign an informed consent and to give a buccal DNA swab.
3. Willing to improve their health.
4. Medically stable. Subjects diagnosed with diet-related chronic disease were able to enroll in the study, provided that their condition was stabilized or well controlled for at least six months at the time of the baseline visit. Determination of stabilized medical condition was based on established clinical guidelines (e.g., Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Guidelines and Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Currently on a therapeutic or restrictive diet (e.g., Atkins).
2. Diagnosis of 2 or more chronic diseases or unstable chronic disease as deemed by accepted clinical guidelines.
3. Clinical diagnosis of any mental health condition.
4. Current or former malignancy for which the participant has undergone resection, radiation therapy or chemotherapy within 5 years prior to baseline.
5. Diagnosis of any medical condition or disease, which in the opinion of the Principal Investigator (PI), may have either put the participant at risk, or influenced the results of the study or the participant's ability to participate in the study.
6. Diagnosis of any of the following medical conditions: HIV, COPD, severe/uncontrolled asthma, cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis, interstitial lung disease, chronic renal failure, colon or small intestine problem, liver or kidney disease.
7. Currently enrolled or plan to be enrolled in another research study during the course of this investigation.
8. Planned or recent (within the last 12 months) bariatric surgery.
9. Current use of weight altering medication for the purpose of weight loss.
10. Uncorrected hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism in the previous 12 months.
11. Alcohol or drug dependence during the previous 12 months.
12. Investigators and their immediate families. Immediate family was defined as a spouse, parent, child or sibling, whether biological or legally adopted.
13. Pregnant and/or breastfeeding.
14. Current smoker.
15. BMI ≥ 35.
16. Any other health risk that may have impaired the study's ability to assess the impact of nutrigenomic information to improve diet and health.

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

35 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, Canada

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kwantlen Polytechnic University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Karen Davison

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Karen Davison, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kwantlen Polytechnic University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Innovation Boulevard

Surrey, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Araujo Almeida V, Littlejohn P, Cop I, Brown E, Afroze R, Davison KM. Comparison of Nutrigenomics Technology Interface Tools for Consumers and Health Professionals: A Sequential Explanatory Mixed Methods Investigation. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 28;21(6):e12580. doi: 10.2196/12580.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31254340 (View on PubMed)

Littlejohn P, Cop I, Brown E, Afroze R, Davison KM. Comparison of Nutrigenomics Technology Interface Tools for Consumers and Health Professionals: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Jun 11;7(6):e115. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9846.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29891470 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

500692 - 16

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id