Validation of a Diet Risk Screening Tool

NCT ID: NCT03805373

Last Updated: 2023-08-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

125 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2020-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is responsible for 1 in 4 deaths in the US annually. Nutrition is an important part of prevention and management of CVD and other chronic diseases, but only about 25% of patients with a chronic disease diagnosis (and about 12% of patients without a chronic disease) receive nutrition counseling from their physician. The investigators plan to validate a diet questionnaire in preparation for the creation of a diet assessment/ intervention tool to increase rates of nutrition intervention in medical care. The aim of this project is to test whether the developed questionnaire accurately identifies individuals at high nutritional risk compared to the Healthy Eating Index- 2015 (HEI-2015) determined by a validated questionnaire.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the US. The risk of heart disease increases with diabetes, overweight/obesity and unhealthy lifestyle behaviors. Despite the well recognized benefits of a healthy lifestyle in reducing heart disease risk, nutrition is not a part of routine medical care. Only about 25% of patients with a chronic disease, such as CVD (and only about 12% of those without a chronic disease), receive nutrition education from their doctor. Doctors often report a lack of confidence in providing nutrition education, and a lack of time in the office visit. Doctors need resources to assess diet and discuss nutrition with patients. This research aims to provide doctors with a diet assessment/ intervention tool to improve rates of nutrition intervention in medical care.

There are few nutrition assessment tools appropriate for use in a medical office visit. The investigators have created a 9-item questionnaire that doctors can use to quickly assess diet in the office visit and plan test to it ensure that it measures diet accurately. In this study, the investigators will test the new questionnaire against an established, validated tool called a food frequency questionnaire. The investigators will also create talking points that physicians can use to help their patients make healthy dietary changes. In the future, the investigators will create a cell phone app based on the questionnaire that can be accessed quickly in an office visit. The app will provide a risk score and personalized talking points that can be discussed with the patient or e-mailed to them directly.

An increase of just 1 serving of fruit per day (1 small apple, 1 cup of berries, 1 orange) could save over 1 million lives per year and reduce heart disease risk dramatically. This project could help to improve nutrition counseling by physicians during office visits, and can be expected to reduce heart disease rates and increase quality of life for those living with heart disease. This is important not only because of the statistics above, but also because when physicians do discuss healthy lifestyle changes with their patients, patients are more likely to make changes and improve their cardiovascular health.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Nutrition Diet Modification Preventive Medicine Cardiovascular Diseases Health Promotion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Diet Assessment Survey

Participants will complete 2 different diet assessment tools separated by at least 1 week.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults across the United States, ages 35-75, with a computer and Internet access
Minimum Eligible Age

35 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

American Heart Association

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Penn State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Penny Kris-Etherton, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Penn State University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Pennsylvania State University

University Park, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Micha R, Penalvo JL, Cudhea F, Imamura F, Rehm CD, Mozaffarian D. Association Between Dietary Factors and Mortality From Heart Disease, Stroke, and Type 2 Diabetes in the United States. JAMA. 2017 Mar 7;317(9):912-924. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.0947.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28267855 (View on PubMed)

Greenwood JL, Lin J, Arguello D, Ball T, Shaw JM. Healthy eating vital sign: a new assessment tool for eating behaviors. ISRN Obes. 2012 Jul 22;2012:734682. doi: 10.5402/2012/734682. eCollection 2012.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24533209 (View on PubMed)

Kris-Etherton PM, Akabas SR, Bales CW, Bistrian B, Braun L, Edwards MS, Laur C, Lenders CM, Levy MD, Palmer CA, Pratt CA, Ray S, Rock CL, Saltzman E, Seidner DL, Van Horn L. The need to advance nutrition education in the training of health care professionals and recommended research to evaluate implementation and effectiveness. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 May;99(5 Suppl):1153S-66S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.073502. Epub 2014 Apr 9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24717343 (View on PubMed)

Johnston EA, Petersen KS, Beasley JM, Krussig T, Mitchell DC, Van Horn LV, Weiss R, Kris-Etherton PM. Relative validity and reliability of a diet risk score (DRS) for clinical practice. BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2020 Oct 8;3(2):263-269. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000134. eCollection 2020 Dec.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33521537 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

19PRE34450165

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

PKE DRS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.