Bispectral Index(BIS) on Depth of Sedation With Dexmedetomidine, Propofol and Midazolam During Spinal Anesthesia
NCT ID: NCT03399019
Last Updated: 2018-01-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
45 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-09-05
2018-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effects of Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine on Propofol Requirement for Loss of Consciousness Undergoing Bispectral Index: a Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Trial
NCT02783846
Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Bispectral Index and Propofol Requirements During Different Menstrual Cycle
NCT02035930
Dexmedetomidine and Desflurane Consumption
NCT02652312
Effect of Sedatives on Regional Cerebral Oxygen Saturation
NCT02966743
The Effect of Remimazolam and Dexmedetomidine on the Incidence of Hypotension During Spinal Anesthesia
NCT05935657
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
If adequate sedation is not maintained during regional anesthesia, surgery may be disturbed by patient's movement. This can cause the patient to be physically and mentally stressed with discomfort.
Commonly used measurement to determine the adequate sedation level relies on subjective physician's assessment such as scoring for response to talk, shake and pain. This measurement is unreliable and not continuous.
Recently, BIS is used to guide sedation during spinal anesthesia as an objective monitoring method in many studies. but previous studies result contrasting in the correlation between BIS and sedation levels with lack in evaluation between sedative drugs.
In this study, the investigators will investigate the usefullness of BIS monitoring during regional anesthesia with sedation and evaluate the suitability of correlation BIS and OAA/S between drugs (midazolam, propofol and dexmedetomidine). The anesthetic and sedation protocol will be standardized.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dexmedetomidine
Dexmedetomidine
: initial loading 0.5- 1 mng/kg for 10 minutes and maintenance 0.2-0.7mng/kg/hr
Check BIS (bispectral index) score and OAA/S (Observer assessment of alertness/sedation score) by time
Dexmedetomidine
initial loading dose (0.5 \~ 1㎍/kg for 10 minutes) and maintenance infusion (0.2-0.7㎍/kg/hr)
Propofol
Propofol
: 0.75-3 mg/kr/hr continous infusion Check BIS (bispectral index) score and OAA/S (Observer assessment of alertness/sedation score) by time
Propofol
continuous infusion (0.75-3mg/kg/hr)
Midazolam
Midazolam
: initial loading 0.5- 1 mng/kg for 10 minutes and maintenance 0.2-0.7mng/kg/hr
Check BIS (bispectral index) score and OAA/S (Observer assessment of alertness/sedation score) by time
Midazolam
0.05mg/kg bolus injection and if not OAA/S ≤ 3 within 5 minutes, add 0.01mg/kg at intervals of 1\~2 minutes
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dexmedetomidine
initial loading dose (0.5 \~ 1㎍/kg for 10 minutes) and maintenance infusion (0.2-0.7㎍/kg/hr)
Propofol
continuous infusion (0.75-3mg/kg/hr)
Midazolam
0.05mg/kg bolus injection and if not OAA/S ≤ 3 within 5 minutes, add 0.01mg/kg at intervals of 1\~2 minutes
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Hemodynamically unstable patients.
* Patients who is noncommunicative.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hallym University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Soo Kyung Lee, M.D
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Hallym University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital
Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kato T, Koitabashi T, Ouchi T, Serita R. The utility of bispectral index monitoring for sedated patients treated with low-dose remifentanil. J Clin Monit Comput. 2012 Dec;26(6):459-63. doi: 10.1007/s10877-012-9379-4. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
Venn RM, Grounds RM. Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation in the intensive care unit: patient and clinician perceptions. Br J Anaesth. 2001 Nov;87(5):684-90. doi: 10.1093/bja/87.5.684.
Kasuya Y, Govinda R, Rauch S, Mascha EJ, Sessler DI, Turan A. The correlation between bispectral index and observational sedation scale in volunteers sedated with dexmedetomidine and propofol. Anesth Analg. 2009 Dec;109(6):1811-5. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c04e58.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016-I097
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.