Paradoxical Excitement Response During Sedation Between Dexmedetomidine and Propofol in Hazardous Alcohol Drinker

NCT ID: NCT02197403

Last Updated: 2019-03-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

110 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-12-31

Study Completion Date

2019-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

1. Adequate sedation with classical sedative agents, propofol
2. Sedation with propofol may induce paradoxical excitement response in heavy alcohol drinkers
3. Dexmedetomidine, α2 receptor agonist, may provide adequate sedation in heavy alcohol drinkers

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

1. Adequate sedation during surgery provide anxiolysis and comfort to patient. Insufficient sedation can't provide comfort to patient during surgery, otherwise excessive sedation can cause variable complications like respiratory depression or delayed awakening.
2. Dexmedetomidine is a centrally acting α2 receptor agonist that is increasingly being used as a sedative for MAC and intensive care with mechanical ventilated patients because of its analgesic properties, "cooperative sedation," and lack of respiratory depression.
3. Because of the different site of action between dexmedetomidine and propofol, we assumed that paradoxical excitement responses which appeared in heavy alcohol drinkers in midazolam or propofol-induced sedation might be less observed in dexmedetomidine-induced sedation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia, Spinal Sedation, Conscious Dexmedetomidine Alcohol Drinking Anesthesia, Epidural Propofol

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

alcohol drinker & dexmedetomidine

dexmedetomidine, 200mcg in 50mL of normal saline 0.75mcg/Kg bolus injection in 10 minutes 0.1\~1.0mcg/Kg infusion during surgery

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

200mcg in 50mL of normal saline 0.75mcg/Kg bolus injection in 10 minutes 0.1\~1.0mcg/Kg infusion

alcohol drinker & propofol

Propofol (2% fresofol) 25\~75mcg/kg/min continuous infusion

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

25\~75mcg/kg/min continuous infusion

Non-alcohol drinker & dexmedetomidine

dexmedetomidine, 200mcg in 50mL of normal saline 0.75mcg/Kg bolus injection in 10 minutes 0.1\~1.0mcg/Kg infusion during surgery

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

200mcg in 50mL of normal saline 0.75mcg/Kg bolus injection in 10 minutes 0.1\~1.0mcg/Kg infusion

Non-alcohol drinker & propofol

Propofol (2% fresofol) 25\~75mcg/kg/min continuous infusion

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

25\~75mcg/kg/min continuous infusion

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dexmedetomidine

200mcg in 50mL of normal saline 0.75mcg/Kg bolus injection in 10 minutes 0.1\~1.0mcg/Kg infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Propofol

25\~75mcg/kg/min continuous infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Precedex Fresofol

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 19\~65 yr-old patients who is scheduled to undergo knee surgery with regional anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

* History of taking anxiolytics, hypnotics, antiepileptic drugs
* Abnormal liver function test (eg: Liver cirrhosis, elevated liver enzymes)
* History of allergic reaction with dexmedetomidine or propofol
* Contraindication with regional anesthesia
* American society of anesthesiologist Physical status III or IV
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chonnam National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jeong-il Choi

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hyunjung Lee, MD, Master

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chonnam National University Hospital

Jeongil Choi, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Chonnam National University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital

Hwasun, Jeollanamdo, South Korea

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Changbeom Park, Master

Role: primary

82-61-379-7598

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jeong S, Lee HG, Kim WM, Jeong CW, Lee SH, Yoon MH, Choi JI. Increase of paradoxical excitement response during propofol-induced sedation in hazardous and harmful alcohol drinkers. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Dec;107(6):930-3. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer275. Epub 2011 Sep 7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21903640 (View on PubMed)

Adams R, Brown GT, Davidson M, Fisher E, Mathisen J, Thomson G, Webster NR. Efficacy of dexmedetomidine compared with midazolam for sedation in adult intensive care patients: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Nov;111(5):703-10. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet194. Epub 2013 Jun 7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23748199 (View on PubMed)

Jakob SM, Ruokonen E, Grounds RM, Sarapohja T, Garratt C, Pocock SJ, Bratty JR, Takala J; Dexmedetomidine for Long-Term Sedation Investigators. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam or propofol for sedation during prolonged mechanical ventilation: two randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2012 Mar 21;307(11):1151-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.304.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22436955 (View on PubMed)

Candiotti KA, Bergese SD, Bokesch PM, Feldman MA, Wisemandle W, Bekker AY; MAC Study Group. Monitored anesthesia care with dexmedetomidine: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jan 1;110(1):47-56. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181ae0856. Epub 2009 Aug 27.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19713256 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

an00543

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.