Use of Dexmedetomidine for Deep Sedation in Patients Undergoing Outpatient Hysteroscopic Surgery

NCT ID: NCT01337739

Last Updated: 2013-07-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

8 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-10-31

Study Completion Date

2012-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients undergoing deep sedation for outpatient procedures typically receive a combination of benzodiazepines, propofol, and opioids. Side effects of such anesthetics include respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting, and urinary retention, with resultant extended hospital stays and unanticipated admission. The use of dexmedetomidine for deep sedation may increase patient safety by maintaining respiratory drive, while providing sedation, hypnosis, and analgesia. Furthermore, patients may experience decreased pain, nausea, and time to discharge in the PACU, especially if dexmedetomidine decreases the requirement of other drugs such as opioids.

The hypothesis of this study is administration of dexmedetomidine during deep sedation for ambulatory hysteroscopic surgery will result in a 50% reduction of intraoperative opioid compared to sedation with propofol.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients will be recruited up to 21 days prior to the day of surgery. Preoperatively: A full preoperative assessment will be completed. Preoperatively, patients will be instructed on the proper use of the verbal rating scale (VRS) for pain and nausea scores. Patients will be randomized by a computer-generated scheme to receive prepared infusions containing either dexmedetomidine (4grams per milliliter or propofol (10 milligrams per milliliter) intraoperatively. The study drug infusions will be prepared by study personnel who are not involved in the assessments. Patients, medical personnel other than the anesthesiologist, and outcome assessors will be blinded to treatment allocation. Only the anesthesiologist administering the treatment infusion and medications intraoperatively will be aware of group allocation.

Intraoperatively: A standardized intraoperative anesthetic plan will be utilized by the anesthesia personnel.All patients will receive premedication with midazolam 2 milligrams intravenous bolus and ketorolac 30 milligrams via the intravenous catheter.

Intraoperative monitoring will include standard monitoring which includes noninvasive blood pressure, electrocardiography, pulse oximetry, and capnography. In addition transcutaneous CO2 will be monitored using the Tosca monitor.(Radiometer, Basel, Austria).

The study drug infusion will be started as either dexmedetomidine (1gram per kilogram over 10 min as a loading dose, followed by a maintenance infusion 0.2 to 1.5 grams per kilogram or propofol (started at 75gram per kilogram per minute and ranging from 12.5 to 125 gram per kilogram per minute titrated to maintain the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (OAA/SS) between 0-1. Intraoperative fluids will be restricted to 500 milliliter + 100mililiterml of Lactated Ringer's solution. At the onset of the procedure, the anesthesiologist will administer 0.7gram/kilogram bolus of fentanyl intravenous, followed by additional 25-50gram boluses for any patient movement to surgical stimulus. All patients will receive ondansetron 4 milligram IV 15-20 minutes prior to the end of surgery. Patients will receive glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg IV if HR decreases below 50 bpm.

Postoperatively:

In the recovery room, VRS for pain will be assessed upon admission and at 30 minute intervals thereafter. Analgesics will be administered according to the severity of the pain and degree of alertness.Vomiting and retching episodes.will be assessed at 30 minute intervals using a VRS, and patients with scores greater than 4 or those who request antiemetic treatment will be treated with metoclopramide 10 mg IV.

Recovery from anesthesia and return of psychomotor ability will be assessed using the Modified Post Anesthesia Discharge Scoring System (MPADSS). A score of 8 or greater will indicate discharge readiness. Discharge readiness requires that a patient be awake and alert with stable vital signs, able to ambulate without assistance, and free of side effects. 24 hours after discharge.

Times from end of surgery to oral intake and readiness for discharge, , and all adverse events and medications administered will be recorded. These data will be recorded by research staff blinded to the study group assignments. Subjects will be contacted by telephone 24 hours after surgery to obtain post-discharge data, including a repeat QoR-40 assessment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo Comparator

Continuous infusion of placebo during operative procedure

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo Comparator

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo administration (.9 normal saline sterile)

Active Comparator

Administration of Dexmedetomidine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Active Comparator

Intervention Type DRUG

Administration of Dexmedetomidine

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Placebo Comparator

Placebo administration (.9 normal saline sterile)

Intervention Type DRUG

Active Comparator

Administration of Dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA I-II
* Age: 18-64 years
* Female
* Surgery: Gynecologic hysteroscopy
* Language: English speaking
* Consent: Obtained

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant or breast feeding
* Significant arrhythmia or high degree atrioventricular nodal block
* Significant hepatic or renal dysfunction
* Chronic use or addiction to opiates or sedatives
* History of heavy alcohol usage (\>4 drinks/day)
* Psychiatric or emotional disorder
* Chronic use of α2-agonists
* Patients with OSA or BMI greater than 30
* Allergy to study drug or anesthetic medications utilized in the protocol
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

64 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Northwestern University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Shireen Ahmad

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shireen Ahmad, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Northwestern University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Prentice Womens Hospital

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bhananker SM, Posner KL, Cheney FW, Caplan RA, Lee LA, Domino KB. Injury and liability associated with monitored anesthesia care: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 2006 Feb;104(2):228-34. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200602000-00005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16436839 (View on PubMed)

Panzer O, Moitra V, Sladen RN. Pharmacology of sedative-analgesic agents: dexmedetomidine, remifentanil, ketamine, volatile anesthetics, and the role of peripheral mu antagonists. Crit Care Clin. 2009 Jul;25(3):451-69, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2009.04.004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19576524 (View on PubMed)

Bhana N, Goa KL, McClellan KJ. Dexmedetomidine. Drugs. 2000 Feb;59(2):263-8; discussion 269-70. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200059020-00012.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10730549 (View on PubMed)

Kaygusuz K, Gokce G, Gursoy S, Ayan S, Mimaroglu C, Gultekin Y. A comparison of sedation with dexmedetomidine or propofol during shockwave lithotripsy: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2008 Jan;106(1):114-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000296453.75494.64.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18165564 (View on PubMed)

Taghinia AH, Shapiro FE, Slavin SA. Dexmedetomidine in aesthetic facial surgery: improving anesthetic safety and efficacy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Jan;121(1):269-276. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000293867.05857.90.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18176230 (View on PubMed)

Koroglu A, Teksan H, Sagir O, Yucel A, Toprak HI, Ersoy OM. A comparison of the sedative, hemodynamic, and respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. Anesth Analg. 2006 Jul;103(1):63-7, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000219592.82598.AA.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16790627 (View on PubMed)

Bergese SD, Khabiri B, Roberts WD, Howie MB, McSweeney TD, Gerhardt MA. Dexmedetomidine for conscious sedation in difficult awake fiberoptic intubation cases. J Clin Anesth. 2007 Mar;19(2):141-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.07.005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17379129 (View on PubMed)

McCutcheon CA, Orme RM, Scott DA, Davies MJ, McGlade DP. A comparison of dexmedetomidine versus conventional therapy for sedation and hemodynamic control during carotid endarterectomy performed under regional anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2006 Mar;102(3):668-75. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000197777.62397.d5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16492813 (View on PubMed)

Arain SR, Ebert TJ. The efficacy, side effects, and recovery characteristics of dexmedetomidine versus propofol when used for intraoperative sedation. Anesth Analg. 2002 Aug;95(2):461-6, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200208000-00042.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12145072 (View on PubMed)

Tufanogullari B, White PF, Peixoto MP, Kianpour D, Lacour T, Griffin J, Skrivanek G, Macaluso A, Shah M, Provost DA. Dexmedetomidine infusion during laparoscopic bariatric surgery: the effect on recovery outcome variables. Anesth Analg. 2008 Jun;106(6):1741-8. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318172c47c.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18499604 (View on PubMed)

Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, Hendler J, Silver JM, Davidson AB, Schwam EM, Siegel JL. Validity and reliability of the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990 Aug;10(4):244-51.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2286697 (View on PubMed)

Chung F. Discharge criteria--a new trend. Can J Anaesth. 1995 Nov;42(11):1056-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03011083.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8590498 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STU00027663

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Dexmedetomidine Effect on Delirium of Elderly Patients
NCT06111300 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE4