Comparison of Remifentanil and Dexmedetomidine for Monitored Anaesthesia Care During Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty

NCT ID: NCT02476981

Last Updated: 2015-06-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

75 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-08-31

Study Completion Date

2014-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomised, double-blind study compared remifentanil and dexmedetomidine for monitored anaesthesia care (MAC) during minimally invasive corrections of vertebral compression fracture (vertebroplasty (VP) and kyphoplasty (KP)).

In total, 80 ASA physical status I-III patients scheduled for VP and KP randomly received remifentanil or dexmedetomidine to maintain OAA/S scale ≤ 4 during the procedures. Multiple hemodynamic variables of patients were recorded and the frequency of oxygen desaturation, respiratory depression, intraoperative need for other opioids, recovery time, operator satisfaction score, and patients' overall pain experiences were also compared.

The investigators are expecting that both remifentanil and dexmedetomidine appear to be quite safe for MAC during VP and KP. Thus, dexmedetomidine may be an alternative for MAC during VP and KP in elderly patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

All patients fasted for 8 h before the procedure and were premedicated with midazolam 0.02 mg/kg. In the prone position, patients were monitored by ECG, non-invasive blood pressure, and pulse oximetry, and received supplemental oxygen (3 L/min) via a nasal cannula during the procedure.

Study drugs were prepared in 20 mL and 50 mL syringes to maintain a double-blind design. One anaesthesiologist administered normal saline or dexmedetomidine contained in the 20-mL syringe during the initial 10 min for loading dose of dexmedetomidine. Then, another investigator who did not know which syringes contained remifentanil or dexmedetomidine adjusted the infusion rate with a 50-mL syringe according to patients' response. After all patients in both groups received a bolus dose of propofol 0.3 mg/kg, patients given remifentanil received continuous infusion of the drug at 1-5 µg/kg/h, and patients receiving dexmedetomidine were given that drug at 0.3-0.4 µg/kg over 10 min, followed by continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.2-1 µg/kg/h throughout the procedure. Levels of patient sedation were checked during the procedure and infusion rates of the study drugs were adjusted to maintain alertness/sedation below 4 on the OAA/S scale.

Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), and adverse effects of the study drugs were recorded during the procedure. Ephedrine 5 mg was injected when systolic blood pressure decreased below 90 mmHg. Duration of PACU stay was also recorded.

Operator satisfaction score and patient's overall pain experience were also recorded.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fractures, Compression

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Remifentanil

Remifentanil is commonly used in monitored anesthesia care because of its rapid onset and short duration of action.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Remifentanil

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients given remifentanil received continuous infusion of the drug at 1-5 µg/kg/h

Dexmedetomidine

Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α 2 adrenergic agonist and has both sedative and analgesic properties, and rarely causes respiratory depression.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients receiving dexmedetomidine were given that drug at 0.3-0.4 µg/kg over 10 min, followed by continuous infusion of 0.2 1 µg/kg/h

midazolam

Midazolam is commonly used before induction for its anxiolytic effect.

Group Type OTHER

Remifentanil

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients given remifentanil received continuous infusion of the drug at 1-5 µg/kg/h

Dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients receiving dexmedetomidine were given that drug at 0.3-0.4 µg/kg over 10 min, followed by continuous infusion of 0.2 1 µg/kg/h

midazolam

Intervention Type DRUG

All patients were premedicated with midazolam 0.02 mg/kg before induction.

propofol

Propofol is the most commonly used in sedative analgesia for its rapid onset and recovery time.

Group Type OTHER

Remifentanil

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients given remifentanil received continuous infusion of the drug at 1-5 µg/kg/h

Dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients receiving dexmedetomidine were given that drug at 0.3-0.4 µg/kg over 10 min, followed by continuous infusion of 0.2 1 µg/kg/h

propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

All patients in both groups received a bolus dose of propofol 0.3 mg/kg for sedative effect.

ephedrine

Adrenergic agonist to treat hypotension

Group Type OTHER

Remifentanil

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients given remifentanil received continuous infusion of the drug at 1-5 µg/kg/h

Dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients receiving dexmedetomidine were given that drug at 0.3-0.4 µg/kg over 10 min, followed by continuous infusion of 0.2 1 µg/kg/h

ephedrine

Intervention Type DRUG

Ephedrine 5 mg was injected when systolic blood pressure decreased below 90 mmHg

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Remifentanil

Patients given remifentanil received continuous infusion of the drug at 1-5 µg/kg/h

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexmedetomidine

Patients receiving dexmedetomidine were given that drug at 0.3-0.4 µg/kg over 10 min, followed by continuous infusion of 0.2 1 µg/kg/h

Intervention Type DRUG

midazolam

All patients were premedicated with midazolam 0.02 mg/kg before induction.

Intervention Type DRUG

propofol

All patients in both groups received a bolus dose of propofol 0.3 mg/kg for sedative effect.

Intervention Type DRUG

ephedrine

Ephedrine 5 mg was injected when systolic blood pressure decreased below 90 mmHg

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ultiva Precedex Pofol

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients who are scheduled for vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty under monitored anesthesia care
* ASA status I-III
* aged more than 65 years old.

Exclusion Criteria

* obesity (BMI \> 30 kg/m2)
* hypotension (systolic blood pressure \< 100 mmHg)
* bradycardia (heart rate \< 60 bpm)
* heart block
* baseline oxygen desaturation (SpO2 \< 90%)
* sleep apnea
* asthma, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
* those who refused to give informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hallym University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Eun Young Park, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Hallym University Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital

Anyang-si, Dongan-gu, South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Nevitt MC, Ettinger B, Black DM, Stone K, Jamal SA, Ensrud K, Segal M, Genant HK, Cummings SR. The association of radiographically detected vertebral fractures with back pain and function: a prospective study. Ann Intern Med. 1998 May 15;128(10):793-800. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-128-10-199805150-00001.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9599190 (View on PubMed)

Sen J, Sen B. A comparative study on monitored anesthesia care. Anesth Essays Res. 2014 Sep-Dec;8(3):313-8. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.143121.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25886327 (View on PubMed)

Ryu JH, Lee SW, Lee JH, Lee EH, Do SH, Kim CS. Randomized double-blind study of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine for flexible bronchoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Mar;108(3):503-11. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer400. Epub 2011 Dec 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22174346 (View on PubMed)

Holas A, Krafft P, Marcovic M, Quehenberger F. Remifentanil, propofol or both for conscious sedation during eye surgery under regional anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1999 Nov;16(11):741-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.1999.00574.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10713867 (View on PubMed)

Hsu YW, Cortinez LI, Robertson KM, Keifer JC, Sum-Ping ST, Moretti EW, Young CC, Wright DR, Macleod DB, Somma J. Dexmedetomidine pharmacodynamics: part I: crossover comparison of the respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2004 Nov;101(5):1066-76. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200411000-00005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15505441 (View on PubMed)

Mohr M, Pillich D, Kirsch M, Mueller JU, Fleck S, Hosten N, Langner S. Percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty with the patient under intravenous analgesia and sedation: a feasibility study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Apr;32(4):649-53. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2345. Epub 2011 Jan 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21273350 (View on PubMed)

Della Puppa A, Andreula C, Frass M. Assisted sedation: a safe and easy method for pain-free percutaneous vertebroplasty. Minerva Anestesiol. 2008 Mar;74(3):57-62.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18288067 (View on PubMed)

Lee JM, Lee SK, Lee SJ, Hwang WS, Jang SW, Park EY. Comparison of remifentanil with dexmedetomidine for monitored anaesthesia care in elderly patients during vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. J Int Med Res. 2016 Apr;44(2):307-16. doi: 10.1177/0300060515607385. Epub 2016 Feb 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26912506 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012-I039

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Study of Dexmedetomidine in Spine Surgery
NCT01850017 COMPLETED PHASE4