Comparison of Remifentanil and Dexmedetomidine for Monitored Anaesthesia Care During Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty
NCT ID: NCT02476981
Last Updated: 2015-06-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
75 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-08-31
2014-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In total, 80 ASA physical status I-III patients scheduled for VP and KP randomly received remifentanil or dexmedetomidine to maintain OAA/S scale ≤ 4 during the procedures. Multiple hemodynamic variables of patients were recorded and the frequency of oxygen desaturation, respiratory depression, intraoperative need for other opioids, recovery time, operator satisfaction score, and patients' overall pain experiences were also compared.
The investigators are expecting that both remifentanil and dexmedetomidine appear to be quite safe for MAC during VP and KP. Thus, dexmedetomidine may be an alternative for MAC during VP and KP in elderly patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Remimazolam and Dexmedetomidine for Intraoperative Sedation
NCT05447507
A Postoperative Sore Throat After Lumbar Spine Surgery in the Prone Position
NCT05345574
Comparison of Dexmedetomidin and Remifentanil for the Effect on Airway Reflex and Hemodynamic Response During Emergence in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy
NCT01365923
A Comparative Study of the Effect of Epidural Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl Added to Ropivacaine in Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery
NCT02375191
Effect of Combination Dexmedetomidine Added to Fentanyl-based Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia on Nausea Vomiting in Highly Susceptible Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Surgery: Prospective Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT01840254
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study drugs were prepared in 20 mL and 50 mL syringes to maintain a double-blind design. One anaesthesiologist administered normal saline or dexmedetomidine contained in the 20-mL syringe during the initial 10 min for loading dose of dexmedetomidine. Then, another investigator who did not know which syringes contained remifentanil or dexmedetomidine adjusted the infusion rate with a 50-mL syringe according to patients' response. After all patients in both groups received a bolus dose of propofol 0.3 mg/kg, patients given remifentanil received continuous infusion of the drug at 1-5 µg/kg/h, and patients receiving dexmedetomidine were given that drug at 0.3-0.4 µg/kg over 10 min, followed by continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.2-1 µg/kg/h throughout the procedure. Levels of patient sedation were checked during the procedure and infusion rates of the study drugs were adjusted to maintain alertness/sedation below 4 on the OAA/S scale.
Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), and adverse effects of the study drugs were recorded during the procedure. Ephedrine 5 mg was injected when systolic blood pressure decreased below 90 mmHg. Duration of PACU stay was also recorded.
Operator satisfaction score and patient's overall pain experience were also recorded.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Remifentanil
Remifentanil is commonly used in monitored anesthesia care because of its rapid onset and short duration of action.
Remifentanil
Patients given remifentanil received continuous infusion of the drug at 1-5 µg/kg/h
Dexmedetomidine
Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α 2 adrenergic agonist and has both sedative and analgesic properties, and rarely causes respiratory depression.
Dexmedetomidine
Patients receiving dexmedetomidine were given that drug at 0.3-0.4 µg/kg over 10 min, followed by continuous infusion of 0.2 1 µg/kg/h
midazolam
Midazolam is commonly used before induction for its anxiolytic effect.
Remifentanil
Patients given remifentanil received continuous infusion of the drug at 1-5 µg/kg/h
Dexmedetomidine
Patients receiving dexmedetomidine were given that drug at 0.3-0.4 µg/kg over 10 min, followed by continuous infusion of 0.2 1 µg/kg/h
midazolam
All patients were premedicated with midazolam 0.02 mg/kg before induction.
propofol
Propofol is the most commonly used in sedative analgesia for its rapid onset and recovery time.
Remifentanil
Patients given remifentanil received continuous infusion of the drug at 1-5 µg/kg/h
Dexmedetomidine
Patients receiving dexmedetomidine were given that drug at 0.3-0.4 µg/kg over 10 min, followed by continuous infusion of 0.2 1 µg/kg/h
propofol
All patients in both groups received a bolus dose of propofol 0.3 mg/kg for sedative effect.
ephedrine
Adrenergic agonist to treat hypotension
Remifentanil
Patients given remifentanil received continuous infusion of the drug at 1-5 µg/kg/h
Dexmedetomidine
Patients receiving dexmedetomidine were given that drug at 0.3-0.4 µg/kg over 10 min, followed by continuous infusion of 0.2 1 µg/kg/h
ephedrine
Ephedrine 5 mg was injected when systolic blood pressure decreased below 90 mmHg
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Remifentanil
Patients given remifentanil received continuous infusion of the drug at 1-5 µg/kg/h
Dexmedetomidine
Patients receiving dexmedetomidine were given that drug at 0.3-0.4 µg/kg over 10 min, followed by continuous infusion of 0.2 1 µg/kg/h
midazolam
All patients were premedicated with midazolam 0.02 mg/kg before induction.
propofol
All patients in both groups received a bolus dose of propofol 0.3 mg/kg for sedative effect.
ephedrine
Ephedrine 5 mg was injected when systolic blood pressure decreased below 90 mmHg
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA status I-III
* aged more than 65 years old.
Exclusion Criteria
* hypotension (systolic blood pressure \< 100 mmHg)
* bradycardia (heart rate \< 60 bpm)
* heart block
* baseline oxygen desaturation (SpO2 \< 90%)
* sleep apnea
* asthma, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
* those who refused to give informed consent
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hallym University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Eun Young Park, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Hallym University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital
Anyang-si, Dongan-gu, South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nevitt MC, Ettinger B, Black DM, Stone K, Jamal SA, Ensrud K, Segal M, Genant HK, Cummings SR. The association of radiographically detected vertebral fractures with back pain and function: a prospective study. Ann Intern Med. 1998 May 15;128(10):793-800. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-128-10-199805150-00001.
Sen J, Sen B. A comparative study on monitored anesthesia care. Anesth Essays Res. 2014 Sep-Dec;8(3):313-8. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.143121.
Ryu JH, Lee SW, Lee JH, Lee EH, Do SH, Kim CS. Randomized double-blind study of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine for flexible bronchoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Mar;108(3):503-11. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer400. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
Holas A, Krafft P, Marcovic M, Quehenberger F. Remifentanil, propofol or both for conscious sedation during eye surgery under regional anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1999 Nov;16(11):741-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.1999.00574.x.
Hsu YW, Cortinez LI, Robertson KM, Keifer JC, Sum-Ping ST, Moretti EW, Young CC, Wright DR, Macleod DB, Somma J. Dexmedetomidine pharmacodynamics: part I: crossover comparison of the respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2004 Nov;101(5):1066-76. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200411000-00005.
Mohr M, Pillich D, Kirsch M, Mueller JU, Fleck S, Hosten N, Langner S. Percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty with the patient under intravenous analgesia and sedation: a feasibility study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Apr;32(4):649-53. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2345. Epub 2011 Jan 27.
Della Puppa A, Andreula C, Frass M. Assisted sedation: a safe and easy method for pain-free percutaneous vertebroplasty. Minerva Anestesiol. 2008 Mar;74(3):57-62.
Lee JM, Lee SK, Lee SJ, Hwang WS, Jang SW, Park EY. Comparison of remifentanil with dexmedetomidine for monitored anaesthesia care in elderly patients during vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. J Int Med Res. 2016 Apr;44(2):307-16. doi: 10.1177/0300060515607385. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2012-I039
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.