Implementation of New Trauma Triage Criteria and Implications on Under- and Overtriage.
NCT ID: NCT03395158
Last Updated: 2018-01-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
2200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-06-01
2017-11-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Impact of Prehospital Trauma Life Support (PHTLS) on Outcome of Traffic Injury
NCT01603537
Time-limited Trials in the Emergency Department
NCT06378151
A Case Management Study Targeted to Reduce Health Care Utilization for Frequent Emergency Department Visitors
NCT01985074
The Use of a Pediatric Trauma Checklist to Improve Clinical Performance in a Simulated Trauma Resuscitation
NCT03234049
Mobile Phone-administered Triage Tool to Followup on Discharged Trauma Patients
NCT03805646
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A power estimation show the need for 588 patients in each group in order to show a statistical difference between 2-5% undertriage at a 95% CI.
The including hospitals has a population base of 1.300.000 inhabitants, and the annual number of trauma alerts has been about 3.000.
The registry has information about time of trauma, initiated alerts, Injury Severity Score and mechanism of injury suitable for analysis for our hypothesis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Prior alert criteria
Patients who activated full, limited or no alert criteria according to the prior alert criteria
Implementation of new alert criteria
The intervention is when the prior alert criteria are replaced by the present alert criteria
Present alert criteria
Patients who activated full, limited or no alert criteria according to the present alert criteria
Implementation of new alert criteria
The intervention is when the prior alert criteria are replaced by the present alert criteria
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Implementation of new alert criteria
The intervention is when the prior alert criteria are replaced by the present alert criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Uppsala-Örebro Regional Research Council
OTHER
Uppsala University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kevin Mani, Ass prof
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Uppsala University
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UppsalaUH
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.