The Impact of Prehospital Trauma Life Support (PHTLS) on Outcome of Traffic Injury

NCT ID: NCT01603537

Last Updated: 2012-05-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

40000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-01-31

Study Completion Date

2012-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Trauma is the leading cause of death among persons below 60 years of age. It is a well-established belief that optimal treatment in the early phase after trauma has a major impact on mortality, and the implementation of specific educational programs for trauma care have been a widely adopted strategy aimed at improving the outcome. This strategy has high face validity, but the underlying evidence is poor. The Prehospital Trauma Life Support (PHTLS) program was introduced in 1983 aiming to integrate prehospital trauma care with the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) program. Approximately half a million prehospital caregivers in over 50 countries have taken the PHTLS course. It has been recognized as one of the leading educational programs for prehospital emergency trauma care. However, the scientific support for improved patient outcome from courses such as PHTLS and ATLS is limited. According to a Cochrane analysis published 2010 there is no evidence to recommend advanced life-support (ALS) training for ambulance crews. Another Cochrane analysis concerning ATLS gave similar results and a recent study indicated even worsened outcome after the implementation of ATLS. An observational study in the county of Uppsala indicated reduced mortality after the implementation of PHTLS but the estimate was uncertain due to a low overall mortality. The aim of this study is to further investigate the association between PHTLS training of ambulance crew members and the outcome in trauma patients in a larger study population. To accomplish this the investigators will use an epidemiological semi-individual design applied to all victims of traffic injury that occurred during the implementation period of the PHTLS course in Sweden (1998-2004). Four outcomes and subsets of patients will be analyzed: Mortality before hospital admission, mortality within 30 days, time to death among survivors to hospital admission and return to work among survivors to hospital discharge.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Source Population: Sweden is divided in 21 administrative regions providing health care (counties). In 2004 Sweden had a population of about 9 million inhabitants with an average population density of 20 inhabitants/km2.

The Emergency Medical Service (EMS)-System: The ambulance staff in Sweden consists of registered nurses and emergency medical technician (EMT) equivalents (nursing assistants with special ambulance training).

Statistics: Hierarchical random effects models will be used to model the binary outcomes. Cox proportional hazards models to analyze the time to event outcomes. The difference in mean predicted outcome between the PHTLS group and the non-PHTLS group will be used to estimate the absolute risk reduction.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Traffic Accidents

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PHTLS

The exposure is defined from the dichotomization of the probability in each event/accident that at least one of the caring ambulance crew members was PHTLS certified.

No interventions assigned to this group

No PHTLS

Not exposed to PHTLS

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Primary incident hospital admissions due to traffic accidents or
* Death due to traffic accidents

Exclusion Criteria

* If a patient appears more than once, all but the first event will be excluded from the dataset.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Uppsala University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Uppsala University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hans Blomberg

Medical Director of the ambulance service

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rolf Gedeborg, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Uppsala University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Uppsala University

Uppsala, County of Uppsala, Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Krug EG, Sharma GK, Lozano R. The global burden of injuries. Am J Public Health. 2000 Apr;90(4):523-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.4.523.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10754963 (View on PubMed)

Trunkey DD, Lim RC Jr, Blaisdell FW. Traumatic injury. A health care crisis. West J Med. 1974 Jan;120(1):92-4. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 4812216 (View on PubMed)

Collicott PE, Hughes I. Training in advanced trauma life support. JAMA. 1980 Mar 21;243(11):1156-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7359667 (View on PubMed)

Jayaraman S, Sethi D. Advanced trauma life support training for ambulance crews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD003109. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003109.pub2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20091538 (View on PubMed)

Jayaraman S, Sethi D. Advanced trauma life support training for hospital staff. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD004173. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004173.pub3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19370594 (View on PubMed)

Drimousis PG, Theodorou D, Toutouzas K, Stergiopoulos S, Delicha EM, Giannopoulos P, Larentzakis A, Katsaragakis S. Advanced Trauma Life Support certified physicians in a non trauma system setting: is it enough? Resuscitation. 2011 Feb;82(2):180-4. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.10.005. Epub 2010 Nov 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21122975 (View on PubMed)

Johansson J, Blomberg H, Svennblad B, Wernroth L, Melhus H, Byberg L, Michaelsson K, Karlsten R, Gedeborg R. Prehospital Trauma Life Support (PHTLS) training of ambulance caregivers and impact on survival of trauma victims. Resuscitation. 2012 Oct;83(10):1259-64. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.02.018. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22366502 (View on PubMed)

Recommended framework for presenting injury mortality data. MMWR Recomm Rep. 1997 Aug 29;46(RR-14):1-30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9301976 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Dnr 2007/264

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.