Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-04-12
2025-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Brief Child Safety Interventions in Emergency Departments (Safety in Seconds)
NCT01432041
Audiovisual Consultations in Prehospital Emergency Care: Randomised Controlled Trial
NCT04312321
Professional Development in Emergency Medical Services
NCT02365792
Outcomes in Youth Visiting the ED With Mental Health Issues: a Pilot Text Based Intervention
NCT02744326
The Impact of Prehospital Trauma Life Support (PHTLS) on Outcome of Traffic Injury
NCT01603537
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The goal is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of TLT initiated in the ED for seriously ill older adults who are starting intensive care.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Is TLT feasible to be conducted by trained ED clinicians?
* Do patients or their surrogates find TLT acceptable in understanding and respecting their end-of-life care preferences?
Participants will be:
* Attending physicians, resident physicians, or mid-level providers working in the ED who are willing to be randomized to become the study interventionists to conduct TLT conversations.
* Seriously ill older adults receiving intensive care in the ED.
Researchers will compare clinicians using TLT with those providing usual care to see if TLT leads to improved patient-centered decision-making and better alignment with patients' end-of-life care preferences.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention group
Attending physicians, resident physicians, or mid-level providers working in the ED who are willing to be randomized to become the study interventionists.
TLT training
Emergency clinicians assigned to the intervention group will receive the following training and resources.
1. The TLT Conversation Guide: The structured conversation guide entails discussing patients' values and goals, prognosis, and shared decision-making to use a trial of intensive care. Originally used in ICU settings, we systematically refined the guide to be used in the ED incorporating inputs from patient advisors' and emergency clinicians' inputs.
2. Clinician Training: The clinician training will include a one-hour didactic on research methodologies and serious illness communication skills, followed by a four-hour communication training with trained actors.
3. EHR Documentation: An EHR template for documenting the TLT conversation findings has been developed.
4. Intensivist Communication: A standard template to communicate the TLT conversation findings to the intensivists has been developed.
Control group
Attending physicians, resident physicians, or mid-level providers working in the ED who are willing to be randomized to become the study interventionists.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
TLT training
Emergency clinicians assigned to the intervention group will receive the following training and resources.
1. The TLT Conversation Guide: The structured conversation guide entails discussing patients' values and goals, prognosis, and shared decision-making to use a trial of intensive care. Originally used in ICU settings, we systematically refined the guide to be used in the ED incorporating inputs from patient advisors' and emergency clinicians' inputs.
2. Clinician Training: The clinician training will include a one-hour didactic on research methodologies and serious illness communication skills, followed by a four-hour communication training with trained actors.
3. EHR Documentation: An EHR template for documenting the TLT conversation findings has been developed.
4. Intensivist Communication: A standard template to communicate the TLT conversation findings to the intensivists has been developed.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. ≥50 years or older with ≥one serious life-limiting illness\* being admitted to the intensive care unit in the ED; or
2. ≥75 years or older being admitted to intensive care unit in the ED; or
3. ED clinicians will not be surprised if the patient died in the current hospital admission or in the near future; and
4. English speaking \*Serious illness criteria with high one-year mortality are selected based on best practice recommendations such as 1) stage III/IV or metastatic cancer; 2) end-stage renal disease on dialysis; 3) chronic heart/lung disease requiring home oxygen supplementation or experiencing shortness of breath with walking; 4) moderate to severe dementia (surrogate required for enrollment); or 5) ≥2 hospitalizations or ED visits in the past six months.
Exclusion Criteria
Patient's eligibility:
The subjects will be seriously ill older adults, or their surrogates being cared for by the participating emergency clinicians (both the intervention or control arms). If the emergency clinicians determine that the patient is not able to provide consent due to cognitive impairment, dementia, delirium, or critical illness, the surrogates will participate in the TLT conversations.
1. Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent; or
2. Non-English speaking; or
3. Clinically inappropriate, determined by emergency clinicians, and no surrogate is available
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kei Ouchi
Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kei Ouchi, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gramling R, Stanek S, Ladwig S, Gajary-Coots E, Cimino J, Anderson W, Norton SA; AAHPM Research Committee Writing Group; Aslakson RA, Ast K, Elk R, Garner KK, Gramling R, Grudzen C, Kamal AH, Lamba S, LeBlanc TW, Rhodes RL, Roeland E, Schulman-Green D, Unroe KT. Feeling Heard and Understood: A Patient-Reported Quality Measure for the Inpatient Palliative Care Setting. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Feb;51(2):150-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.10.018. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
Engelberg R, Downey L, Curtis JR. Psychometric characteristics of a quality of communication questionnaire assessing communication about end-of-life care. J Palliat Med. 2006 Oct;9(5):1086-98. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2006.9.1086.
Brehaut JC, O'Connor AM, Wood TJ, Hack TF, Siminoff L, Gordon E, Feldman-Stewart D. Validation of a decision regret scale. Med Decis Making. 2003 Jul-Aug;23(4):281-92. doi: 10.1177/0272989X03256005.
Hashimoto T, Putman RK, Massaro AF, Shiozawa Y, McGough K, McCabe KK, Linden JA, Wang W, Liu SW, Kennedy M, Neville TH, Kruser JM, Sudore RL, Schonberg MA, Tulsky JA, Ouchi K. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial: Integrating the 'Time-limited Trial' in the emergency department. PLoS One. 2024 Dec 23;19(12):e0313858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313858. eCollection 2024.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023P002243
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.