Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-06-30
2019-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Prevalence of diabetes is twice higher in Reunion Island than in metropolitan France. As a consequence, the rate co-morbobidities, such as chronic obliterative arteriopathy of the inferior limbs, is also increases.
This study compares the efficiency of two analgesic treatments in diabetics with forefoot injuries.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Using Lymphovenous Bypass to Alleviate Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
NCT07126197
Differential Characteristics of Neuropathy in Type 2 Diabetics With and Without Lower Extremity Wounds
NCT02347709
Management of Diabetic Patients With Neuropathic Osteoarthropathy (Charcot Foot) : Descriptive Study in Diabetic-foot Centers
NCT03744039
Posterior Tibial Nerve PRF for Diabetic Neuropathic Pain
NCT06463015
Neurophysiological, Autonomic, and Sonographic Assessment of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
NCT07306884
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* their eligibility to analgesic treatment using continuous peripheral nerve blocks
* the unability of usual pain management to reduce their pain (pain visual analogic scale equal to or more than 4).
When patient 's response to pharmacological analgesic treatment is sufficient (pain visual analogic scale equal to or less than 3), patient is allocated to the control group.
Patients of experimental group received a continous analgesic treatment for 6 weeks using ropivacaine (2mg/ml, flow rate 7 ml/h).
Patients of control group received an analgesic treatment according the recommended pain ladder of World Health Organization (WHO). Opioids for mild-to-moderate pain are used in combination with a non-opioid analgesic, such as paracetamol, at the second step of the ladder. If regular maximum doses of opioids for mild-to-moderate pain do not achieve adequate analgesia, then they should be replaced with an opioid for moderate-to-severe pain, such as morphine.
Efficiency of both treatment is assessed the improvement of oxygen level in the tissue below the skin of the injured forefoot through the study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Continuous peripheral nerve blocks
Ropivacaine-continous treatment using catheters for continous sciatic nerve blocks
Continuous peripheral nerve blocks
6 weeks-ropivacaine treatment delivered by continuous peripheral nerve blocks Transcutaneous oxygen measurement is assessed on day 2, week 3 and week 6 under atmospheric and hyperbaric conditions
Analgesic treatment
Pharmacological pain management in accordance with WHO's pain relief ladder
Analgesic treatment
6 weeks-analgesic treatment according to WHO's pain relief ladder Transcutaneous oxygen measurement is assessed on day 2, week 3 and week 6 under atmospheric and hyperbaric conditions
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Continuous peripheral nerve blocks
6 weeks-ropivacaine treatment delivered by continuous peripheral nerve blocks Transcutaneous oxygen measurement is assessed on day 2, week 3 and week 6 under atmospheric and hyperbaric conditions
Analgesic treatment
6 weeks-analgesic treatment according to WHO's pain relief ladder Transcutaneous oxygen measurement is assessed on day 2, week 3 and week 6 under atmospheric and hyperbaric conditions
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diabetics with chronic obliterative arteriopathy of the inferior limbs
* Permanent limb ischaemia with a TcPO2 of the front-foot of at least 10 mmHg under atmospheric conditions
* Lack of surgical revascularization
* No contraindication to hyperbaric therapy
* Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Conditions that could alter hyperbaric measurements (anemia \< 8 g/dl, cardiac or respiratory insufficiency)
* patients with planned limb amputation
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Valérie NAKAMURA, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centre Hpospitalier Universitaire de La REUNION
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016/CHU/05
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.