Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Diabetic Patients

NCT ID: NCT01488474

Last Updated: 2015-01-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

124 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-31

Study Completion Date

2013-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in industrialized countries is estimated to be about 7.3% and its incidence has been growing in recent years. The prevalence of diabetic neuropathy in the diabetic patient population is up to 50%. When limb surgery is necessary, it is reasonable to assume that diabetic patients will benefit from a peripheral regional anesthesia because of the severe comorbidities associated with DM. On the other hand, the use of regional anesthesia (RA) has generally not been recommended in patients with preexisting neuropathies mainly because of medical liability issues, as worsening neuropathy could be attributed to nerve damage caused by the regional anesthetic. The current state of the art of peripheral regional anesthesia for the identification of correct placement of an injection needle suitably close to the target nerve is to elicit a motor response by current injection through the needle. Constant reduction of the current as the nerve is approached ensures close proximity so that an effective nerve block is obtained when the local anesthetic is delivered through the needle, and absence of a motor response at 0.3 mA is generally accepted as a safety marker to avoid harmful intraneural injection. An important deficit in our understanding is whether diabetic neuropathy influences the stimulation parameters for peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), possibly decreasing safety.

The currently proposed research is guided by the hypothesis that nerves in patients with DM are more resistant to stimulation and the current thresholds for PNS have to be set much higher to prevent injections from occurring within the epineurium. The investigators will examine the effect of DM on nerve excitability in a blinded, prospective, observational case control trial. Accordingly, the investigators have defined following aims:

Specific Aim 1: To characterize the required stimulation current in patients with and without diabetes mellitus.

Specific Aim 2: Follow-up to examine if the rate of adverse neurologic events is higher in diabetic patients.

Specific Aim 3: Guided by the results, formulate recommendations for the performance of regional anesthesia in patients with a history of DM.

These experiments will provide better understanding of the needle-current-nerve relationship during peripheral nerve stimulation. Findings from this study will have a major impact on patient safety, especially in the subgroup with preexisting neuropathy, undergoing regional anesthesia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetic Polyneuropathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Diabetes Mellitus (DM)

Patients with diagnosed diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2 undergoing surgery of the lower limb and are receiving regional anesthesia with peripheral nerve stimulation

peripheral nerve stimulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

defining the minimal current threshold for distal motor response

Control (C)

Patients with no history of diabetes mellitus Type 1 or 2 undergoing surgery of the lower limb and are receiving regional anesthesia with peripheral nerve stimulation

peripheral nerve stimulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

defining the minimal current threshold for distal motor response

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

peripheral nerve stimulation

defining the minimal current threshold for distal motor response

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients of both sexes
* age more than 18 years
* American Society of Anesthesiology status 1 to 4
* signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Allergies to local anesthetics
* Unwillingness or incapability to sign informed consent
* Any preexisting neurological deficit of the lower limb that cannot be attributed to diabetic neuropathy
* Ongoing dual anti-platelet therapy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical University of Graz

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rigaud Marcel, MD

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marcel Rigaud, PD, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical University of Graz

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medical University of Graz

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Heschl S, Hallmann B, Zilke T, Gemes G, Schoerghuber M, Auer-Grumbach M, Quehenberger F, Lirk P, Hogan Q, Rigaud M. Diabetic neuropathy increases stimulation threshold during popliteal sciatic nerve block. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Apr;116(4):538-45. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew027.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26994231 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KLI 135

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.