Cryoneurolysis for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy of the Foot
NCT ID: NCT06646731
Last Updated: 2025-09-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-08-25
2026-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation and Treatment for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
NCT07317284
The Therapeutic Effect of Low-intensity Focused Ultrasound on Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
NCT05624762
The Effect of Intraneural Facilitation Therapy on Diabetic Patients With Peripheral Neuropathy
NCT04025320
Posterior Tibial Nerve PRF for Diabetic Neuropathic Pain
NCT06463015
Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy With Photon Stimulation
NCT00539175
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Our objective is to investigate the therapeutic benefits of cryoneurolysis for research participants with painful diabetic neuropathy of the feet via a pilot study of 30 research participants. We hypothesize that ultrasound-guided cryoneurolysis of the superficial peroneal nerve will improve pain outcomes in research participants with painful diabetic neuropathy of the foot. The aims of this study will be to:
Primary Specific Aim. Demonstrate the potential efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous cryoneurolysis of the superficial peroneal nerve, sural, distal saphenous, and/or deep peroneal nerve to treat painful diabetic neuropathy of the foot in reducing neuropathic pain 1 month after the procedure compared to baseline. This will be performed as a pilot study and executed as a randomized sham-controlled clinical trial of 30 subjects.
Hypothesis 1: Diabetic neuropathic pain intensity will be decreased relative to baseline 1 month following a cryoneurolysis procedure (as measured by the Neuropathic Pain Scale).
Secondary Specific Aim: To test the influence of a cryoanalgesia treatment as compared to sham/placebo on the long term measurements related to pain, quality of life, and analgesic usage.
Hypothesis 2a: Perception of well-being will be improved 1 month following one cryoneurolysis procedure (as measured with the Patient Global Impression of Change Scale).
Hypothesis 2b: Physical and emotional functioning will be improved relative to baseline 1 month following one cryoneurolysis procedure (as measured with the Interference Subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory).
Hypothesis 2c: Pain and opioid consumption will be reduced in the cryoneurolysis group compare to sham at multiple post-procedure time points, including 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cryoneurolysis
For participants randomized to active treatment, the probe placed in the research participant will be triggered and the nitrous oxide passed through the probe and then back into the machine, and finally vented out from the console. This will result in a freeze-thaw cycle. This may be repeated, as necessary, to ensure the entire cross-section of each nerve is fully treated.
cryoneurolysis
Peripheral nerve cryoneurolysis of the foot
Sham
Patients in this arm will also receive a diagnostic block with local anesthetic. If pain relief is satisfactory, the patients in this arm will undergo the procedure but the cryo probe will simply not be activated.
sham cryoneurolysis
a sham probe will be placed percutaneously proximal to target nerves. No cryoneurolysis will be given.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
cryoneurolysis
Peripheral nerve cryoneurolysis of the foot
sham cryoneurolysis
a sham probe will be placed percutaneously proximal to target nerves. No cryoneurolysis will be given.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* HgbA1c \<10 (to avoid any increased risk of site infection)
* Adult patients of at least 18 years of age
* Experiencing at least moderate diabetic neuropathic pain in the foot - defined as 3 or higher on the numeric rating scale (NRS; 0-10, 0=no pain; 10=worse imaginable pain) - at least daily for the previous 2 months.
Exclusion Criteria
* Comorbidities that are contraindication to cryoneurolysis (e.g., Reynaud syndrome, cryoglobulinemia, cold urticaria)
* Allergy to local anesthetic
* Pregnancy
* Incarceration
* Inability to communicate to investigators due to lack of capacity
* Local infection in the foot/ankle where cryoneurolysis will be performed
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, San Diego
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rodney Gabriel
Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California, San Diego
La Jolla, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Yoon JH, Grechushkin V, Chaudhry A, Bhattacharji P, Durkin B, Moore W. Cryoneurolysis in Patients with Refractory Chronic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Feb;27(2):239-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.11.027. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
Jay GW, Barkin RL. Neuropathic pain: etiology, pathophysiology, mechanisms, and evaluations. Dis Mon. 2014 Jan;60(1):6-47. doi: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2013.12.001. No abstract available.
Gabriel RA, Seng EC, Curran BP, Winston P, Trescot AM, Filipovski I. A Narrative Review of Ultrasound-Guided and Landmark-based Percutaneous Cryoneurolysis for the Management of Acute and Chronic Pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2024 Nov;28(11):1097-1104. doi: 10.1007/s11916-024-01281-z. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
Filipovski I, Gabriel RA, Kestenholz R. Ultrasound-Guided Cryoneurolysis for the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy of the Foot: A Case Series. Cureus. 2024 Mar 16;16(3):e56267. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56267. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
811212
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.