Evaluating Anatomic Versus Targeted Lead Placement for Burst Stimulation Therapy During the Trial
NCT ID: NCT03277378
Last Updated: 2021-01-05
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
270 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-09-22
2018-10-12
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Treatment of Neck and Upper Limb Pain Using BurstDR (De Ridder) Stimulation
NCT03159169
Comparison of 1000 Hertz (Hz), Burst, and Standard Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Relief
NCT02902796
Motor Cortex Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Facial, Upper Extremity, and Throat Pain.
NCT02321566
A DirEct to PatieNt Study in Chronic Pain
NCT05515341
Trigger Point Dry Needling vs Trigger Point Dry Needling With Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation
NCT03539588
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Group 1 (AB): anatomic lead placement followed by BurstDR™ stimulation during an initial trial evaluation period Group 2 (TB): targeted lead placement followed by BurstDR™ stimulation during an initial trial evaluation period
If the subject qualifies for permanent system implant according to pre-defined criteria after the initial trial evaluation period, the subject will exit the clinical investigation and continue their treatment per the physician's standard of care. Subjects who do not qualify for permanent system implant according to pre-defined criteria after the initial trial evaluation period may participate in an extended trial evaluation period, per physician discretion, during which they will be programmed with tonic stimulation. Subjects continuing to an extended trial evaluation period will be followed through the completion of the extended trial period. At the end of the extended trial evaluation period, subjects will exit the clinical investigation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1 (AB)
Group 1 (AB): anatomic lead placement followed by BurstDR™ stimulation during an initial trial evaluation period
lead placement followed by BurstDR stimulation
lead placement followed by BurstDR stimulation
Group 2 (TB)
Group 2 (TB): targeted lead placement followed by BurstDR™ stimulation during an initial trial evaluation period
lead placement followed by BurstDR stimulation
lead placement followed by BurstDR stimulation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
lead placement followed by BurstDR stimulation
lead placement followed by BurstDR stimulation
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patient's pain profile indicates appropriate lead placement would be at one or more levels from T7 to T10, to achieve pain coverage.
3. Patient has a baseline score on the Numerical Rating Scale ≥6 over the past 24 hours for 'average overall pain'specific to the area(s) of chronic pain that will be treated with spinal cord stimulation.
4. Patient is considered by the Study Investigator as a candidate for implantation of a spinal cord stimulator system according to the system Instructions for Use.
5. Patient is \>18 years of age at the time of enrollment.
6. Patient is willing to adhere to the study requirements, including compliance with and completion of all study visits.
7. Patient has signed and received a copy of the Ethical Committee/Independent Review Board approved informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patient has previously failed a spinal cord stimulation therapy (either trial system evaluation or permanent system implant).
3. Patient has a primary diagnosis of Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD), Angina Pectoris, or Chronic Migraine.
4. Patient is scheduled to undergo an on-the-table trial evaluation (aka all-in-one procedure)
5. Patient is scheduled to be implanted with (a) surgical paddle trial lead(s).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Abbott Medical Devices
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robyn Capobianco, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Abbott
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Jason Edward Pope, MD
Santa Rosa, California, United States
Comprehensive Spine Institute
Clearwater, Florida, United States
Florida Pain Institute
Merritt Island, Florida, United States
National Pain Institute Winter Park
Winter Park, Florida, United States
Rush University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Kansas University Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
Advanced Pain Care
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Nevada Advanced Pain Specialists
Reno, Nevada, United States
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, United States
Spinal Diagnostics
Tualatin, Oregon, United States
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
Precision Spine Care
Tyler, Texas, United States
St. Mary's Hospital
Huntington, West Virginia, United States
Frankston Pain Management
Frankston, , Australia
North Shore Private Hospital
Saint Leonards, , Australia
Hospital Elisabethinen GmbH
Graz, , Austria
Wilhelminenspital Wien
Vienna, , Austria
Sana Kliniken Duisburg Gm.bH
Duisburg, , Germany
Medizinische Einrichtungen der Universität Düsseldorf
Düsseldorf, , Germany
Hospital Gera -Zentrum für interdisziplinäre Schmerztherapie
Gera, , Germany
Klinikum Nürnberg Sud
Nuremberg, , Germany
Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri
Pavia, , Italy
Alrijne Ziekenhuis
Leiderdorp, , Netherlands
Stichting Rijnstate Ziekenhuis - Velp
Velp, , Netherlands
University Hospital
Uppsala, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SJM-CIP-10116
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.