Evaluating Anatomic Versus Targeted Lead Placement for Burst Stimulation Therapy During the Trial

NCT ID: NCT03277378

Last Updated: 2021-01-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

270 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-09-22

Study Completion Date

2018-10-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Prospective, multi-center, randomized, single blind study

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This clinical investigation compares success rates for anatomically placed leads to conventional, targeted lead placement for BurstDR™ during the trial evaluation period with the St Jude Medical™ Invisible Trial System. Subjects will be blinded to treatment group and randomized in a 1:1 ratio as follows:

Group 1 (AB): anatomic lead placement followed by BurstDR™ stimulation during an initial trial evaluation period Group 2 (TB): targeted lead placement followed by BurstDR™ stimulation during an initial trial evaluation period

If the subject qualifies for permanent system implant according to pre-defined criteria after the initial trial evaluation period, the subject will exit the clinical investigation and continue their treatment per the physician's standard of care. Subjects who do not qualify for permanent system implant according to pre-defined criteria after the initial trial evaluation period may participate in an extended trial evaluation period, per physician discretion, during which they will be programmed with tonic stimulation. Subjects continuing to an extended trial evaluation period will be followed through the completion of the extended trial period. At the end of the extended trial evaluation period, subjects will exit the clinical investigation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic, Intractable Pain of the Trunk and/or Lower Limbs

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1 (AB)

Group 1 (AB): anatomic lead placement followed by BurstDR™ stimulation during an initial trial evaluation period

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

lead placement followed by BurstDR stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

lead placement followed by BurstDR stimulation

Group 2 (TB)

Group 2 (TB): targeted lead placement followed by BurstDR™ stimulation during an initial trial evaluation period

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

lead placement followed by BurstDR stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

lead placement followed by BurstDR stimulation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

lead placement followed by BurstDR stimulation

lead placement followed by BurstDR stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Spinal Cord Stimulation non-surgical Leads Spinal Cord Stimulation Clinician Programmer Spinal Cord Stimulation Patient Controller

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient indicated for Spinal Cord Stimulation therapy in accordance with the approved labeling.
2. Patient's pain profile indicates appropriate lead placement would be at one or more levels from T7 to T10, to achieve pain coverage.
3. Patient has a baseline score on the Numerical Rating Scale ≥6 over the past 24 hours for 'average overall pain'specific to the area(s) of chronic pain that will be treated with spinal cord stimulation.
4. Patient is considered by the Study Investigator as a candidate for implantation of a spinal cord stimulator system according to the system Instructions for Use.
5. Patient is \>18 years of age at the time of enrollment.
6. Patient is willing to adhere to the study requirements, including compliance with and completion of all study visits.
7. Patient has signed and received a copy of the Ethical Committee/Independent Review Board approved informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient currently has a spinal cord stimulation system implanted.
2. Patient has previously failed a spinal cord stimulation therapy (either trial system evaluation or permanent system implant).
3. Patient has a primary diagnosis of Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD), Angina Pectoris, or Chronic Migraine.
4. Patient is scheduled to undergo an on-the-table trial evaluation (aka all-in-one procedure)
5. Patient is scheduled to be implanted with (a) surgical paddle trial lead(s).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Abbott Medical Devices

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Robyn Capobianco, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Abbott

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Jason Edward Pope, MD

Santa Rosa, California, United States

Site Status

Comprehensive Spine Institute

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Florida Pain Institute

Merritt Island, Florida, United States

Site Status

National Pain Institute Winter Park

Winter Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Rush University

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Kansas University Medical Center

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Advanced Pain Care

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Nevada Advanced Pain Specialists

Reno, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Oregon Health & Science University

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Spinal Diagnostics

Tualatin, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Rhode Island Hospital

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Precision Spine Care

Tyler, Texas, United States

Site Status

St. Mary's Hospital

Huntington, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Frankston Pain Management

Frankston, , Australia

Site Status

North Shore Private Hospital

Saint Leonards, , Australia

Site Status

Hospital Elisabethinen GmbH

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Wilhelminenspital Wien

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Sana Kliniken Duisburg Gm.bH

Duisburg, , Germany

Site Status

Medizinische Einrichtungen der Universität Düsseldorf

Düsseldorf, , Germany

Site Status

Hospital Gera -Zentrum für interdisziplinäre Schmerztherapie

Gera, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Nürnberg Sud

Nuremberg, , Germany

Site Status

Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri

Pavia, , Italy

Site Status

Alrijne Ziekenhuis

Leiderdorp, , Netherlands

Site Status

Stichting Rijnstate Ziekenhuis - Velp

Velp, , Netherlands

Site Status

University Hospital

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Austria Germany Italy Netherlands Sweden

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SJM-CIP-10116

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Paraspinal Stimulation in Treating MPS
NCT01708343 UNKNOWN PHASE3
Vestibular Pain Interactions
NCT02358954 COMPLETED NA