Patient Experience Comparing Tonic Vs. Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation For Chronic Pain

NCT ID: NCT04159753

Last Updated: 2022-01-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

2 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-10-10

Study Completion Date

2021-04-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Researchers are evaluating if subjects who have already experienced tonic spinal cord stimulation would have a better pain relief status with burst spinal cord stimulation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study is a controlled trial with subjects that have an already-implanted SCS device (Eon Mini™) and are not satisfied with their pain relief status. As part of medical standard of care, patients with already-implanted Eon family tonic implantable pulse generators (IPGs) have the opportunity to experience burst stimulation for 30-Day Trial FDA approved. The aim of the study record patients experience during the 30-Day Trial using standard questionnaires.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Spinal Cord Stimulator

Burst neurostimulation

Group Type OTHER

Spinal Cord Stimulator

Intervention Type DEVICE

We will record patient's experience on the 30-Day FDA approved Burst Spinal Cord Stimulator Trial (BurstDR™, Abbott Saint Jude Medical).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Spinal Cord Stimulator

We will record patient's experience on the 30-Day FDA approved Burst Spinal Cord Stimulator Trial (BurstDR™, Abbott Saint Jude Medical).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Neurostimulator

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Males and females ≥18 years-old
* Diagnosed with chronic pain
* Have an already-implanted Eon Family IPG for a minimum period of 6 months
* Are interested in trying burst technology by reprograming their IPG for 2-3 weeks according to the 30-Day Trial standard of care
* Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Subject's overall Beck Depression Inventory II Score is \>24 or has a score of 3 on question 9 relating to suicidal thoughts or wishes at the screening visit; If subjects scores indicate suicidal thoughts, subject is going to be evaluated further if they will be subjects to Baker's act
* Subject is currently receiving, applying or considering seeking disability payments, workers compensation, or is involved in disability litigation
* Subject has an infusion pump or any other implantable neurostimulator device
* Subjects with a separate, concurrent, clinically significant or disabling chronic pain problem that requires additional medical or surgical treatment
* Subject's pain originates from peripheral vascular disease
* Subject is immunocompromised
* Subject has a documented history of substance abuse (narcotics, alcohol, etc.) or substance dependency in the 6 months prior to baseline data collection
* Subject has history of cancer requiring active treatment in the last 6 months
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Michael D. Osborne

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Osborne, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mayo Clinic in Florida

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

19-001362

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PNS vs RFA for Facet Joint Pain
NCT05952518 RECRUITING NA