Comparison Between Sensory and Motor Transcutaneous Electrical Nervous Stimulation on Electromyographic and Kinesiographic Activity of Patients With Temporomandibular Disorder: a Controlled Clinical Trial

NCT ID: NCT01832207

Last Updated: 2013-04-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-31

Study Completion Date

2012-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background The purpose of the present controlled clinical trial was to assess the effect of a single 60 min application of transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation (TENS) at sensory stimulation threshold (STS), compared to the application of motor stimulation threshold (MTS) as well as to untreatment, on the surface electromyographic (sEMG) and kinesiographic activity of patients with temporomandibular disorder (TMD). Methods Sixty female subjects, selected according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, suffering from unilateral TMD in remission were assigned to MTS, STS or untreatment. Pre- and post-treatment differences in the sEMG activity of temporalis anterior (TA), masseter (MM), digastric (DA) and sternocleidomastoid muscles (SCM), as well in the interocclusal distance (ID), within group were tested using the Wilcoxon test, while differences among groups were assessed by Kruskal-Wallis test; the level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.01.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Temporomandibular Disorders

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MTS

Motor threshold of stimulation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

STS

Sensorial threshold of stimulation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Placebo

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Placebo transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Placebo transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age less than 30 years;
* female gender
* right-handed (7-10 points in Edinburgh inventory);
* presence of complete permanent dentition, with the exception of the third molars;
* normal occlusion;
* diagnosis of unilateral arthrogenous TMD on the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD), Axis I, groups II and III

Exclusion Criteria

* having pacemaker or other electrical devices
* previous experience of TENS or biofeedback
* systemic diseases
* history of local or general trauma
* neurological or psychiatric disorders
* muscular diseases
* cervical pain
* bruxism diagnosed by the presence of parafunctional facets and/or anamnesis of parafunctional tooth clenching and/or grinding
* pregnancy
* assumption of anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antidepressant or myorelaxant drugs
* fixed or removable prostheses
* fixed restorations that affected the occlusal surfaces
* previous or concurrent orthodontic or orthognathic treatment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of L'Aquila

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Fabrizio Sgolastra

Dr

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Monaco A, Sgolastra F, Pietropaoli D, Giannoni M, Cattaneo R. Comparison between sensory and motor transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation on electromyographic and kinesiographic activity of patients with temporomandibular disorder: a controlled clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 May 15;14:168. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-168.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23672400 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TMD-224301

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.