Remediation of Age-related Cognitive Decline: Vortioxetine and Cognitive Training

NCT ID: NCT03272711

Last Updated: 2020-01-14

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

129 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-08-31

Study Completion Date

2019-01-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this research study is to examine the potential benefits of vortioxetine in combination with at-home computerized cognitive training program to improve cognition, such as memory, attention, and concentration. This study will compare the effectiveness of vortioxetine plus cognitive training versus placebo plus cognitive training.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this research study is to examine the potential benefits of vortioxetine in combination with at-home computerized cognitive training program to improve cognition, such as memory, attention, and concentration. This study will compare the effectiveness of vortioxetine plus cognitive training versus placebo plus cognitive training.

Vortioxetine is considered investigational when used as a treatment for age-related cognitive decline, which means that it has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for this purpose. Vortioxetine is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as a treatment for depression, and also goes by the name Trintellix (formerly known as Brintellix). That means that, while the drug itself is approved by the FDA, it is not approved for the reasons the investigators are using it in this study.

Participation in this study entails an estimated 6 study visits over the course of approximately six months. Participants will complete various assessments at our lab at the Washington University School of Medicine along with check-in visits in-person or over the phone. Additionally, they will participate in at home computerized cognitive training for approximately six months, supplemented with either vortioxetine or placebo.

The investigators will assess memory and problem-solving abilities using paper and pencil, computerized measures, and self-assessments of how participants feel. These tests could include numbers, letters, symbols, words, or sentences. These tests will be repeated throughout the study. If eligible to do so, participants will complete a baseline MRI scan.

A subset of participants who completed a baseline MRI scan will complete another MRI scan after approximately 26 weeks of vortioxetine or placebo and at home computerized cognitive training.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Age-related Cognitive Decline

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Vortioxetine plus cognitive training

Vortioxetine (10 mg) plus cognitive training 5 times weekly for 30 minutes a day

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Vortioxetine 10 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Cognitive training program

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Online training program, 30 minutes a day, 5 times a week

Placebo plus cognitive training

Placebo plus cognitive training 5 times weekly for 30 minutes a day

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Cognitive training program

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Online training program, 30 minutes a day, 5 times a week

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Vortioxetine 10 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Cognitive training program

Online training program, 30 minutes a day, 5 times a week

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Trintellix

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Community-living men and women age 65 and older
* Age-related cognitive decline as defined by (a) self-reported cognitive dysfunction that is attributed to the aging process (in response to screening questions to the participant); (b) ability to complete cognitive battery, but still scoring less than 1 standard deviation above age-matched norms at both baseline and after the two-week cognitive training lead-in.

Exclusion Criteria

* Known dementia or other clinical neurodegenerative illness (e.g., Parkinson's disease, cerebrovascular disease) per self-report, informant report, medical records, or neuropsychological testing
* Any current psychiatric disorder
* Medical conditions that suggest shortened lifespan, such as metastatic cancer; or would prohibit safe participation in the interventions, including cardiovascular disease or musculoskeletal conditions; or with the assessments.
* Sensory impairment that would prevent participation
* IQ \< 70 as estimated by the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading
* Alcohol or substance abuse within 6 months
* Concurrent cognitive training, such as brain-training software, or other interventions expected to affect neuroplasticity
* Psychotropic medications or those with likely CNS effects (none within 4 weeks prior to study entry)
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Queen's University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Washington University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Eric Lenze, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Washington University School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Washington University School of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ball K, Berch DB, Helmers KF, Jobe JB, Leveck MD, Marsiske M, Morris JN, Rebok GW, Smith DM, Tennstedt SL, Unverzagt FW, Willis SL; Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly Study Group. Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002 Nov 13;288(18):2271-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.18.2271.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12425704 (View on PubMed)

Bowie CR, Gupta M, Holshausen K, Jokic R, Best M, Milev R. Cognitive remediation for treatment-resistant depression: effects on cognition and functioning and the role of online homework. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2013 Aug;201(8):680-5. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31829c5030.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23896849 (View on PubMed)

Kozauer N, Katz R. Regulatory innovation and drug development for early-stage Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 28;368(13):1169-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1302513. Epub 2013 Mar 13. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23484795 (View on PubMed)

Lampit A, Hallock H, Valenzuela M. Computerized cognitive training in cognitively healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effect modifiers. PLoS Med. 2014 Nov 18;11(11):e1001756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001756. eCollection 2014 Nov.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25405755 (View on PubMed)

Lenze EJ, Stevens A, Waring JD, Pham VT, Haddad R, Shimony J, Miller JP, Bowie CR. Augmenting Computerized Cognitive Training With Vortioxetine for Age-Related Cognitive Decline: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 1;177(6):548-555. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19050561. Epub 2020 Mar 26.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32212856 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

201509107

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Combined tDCS and Cognitive Training in Alzheimer's
NCT06861231 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA