Remediation of Age-related Cognitive Decline: Vortioxetine and Cognitive Training
NCT ID: NCT03272711
Last Updated: 2020-01-14
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
129 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-08-31
2019-01-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of NeuroQ on Cognitive Function in Health Adults with Self-Reported Memory Problems
NCT06672094
Association of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation with Digital Cognitive Training for Cognitive Remediation in Older Adults
NCT06733714
Neurostimulation and Cognitive Intervention in Alzheimer's Disease
NCT02772185
Using Exercise and Electrical Brain Stimulation to Improve Memory in Dementia
NCT03670615
Personalized Brain Stimulation for Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults
NCT07208734
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Vortioxetine is considered investigational when used as a treatment for age-related cognitive decline, which means that it has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for this purpose. Vortioxetine is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as a treatment for depression, and also goes by the name Trintellix (formerly known as Brintellix). That means that, while the drug itself is approved by the FDA, it is not approved for the reasons the investigators are using it in this study.
Participation in this study entails an estimated 6 study visits over the course of approximately six months. Participants will complete various assessments at our lab at the Washington University School of Medicine along with check-in visits in-person or over the phone. Additionally, they will participate in at home computerized cognitive training for approximately six months, supplemented with either vortioxetine or placebo.
The investigators will assess memory and problem-solving abilities using paper and pencil, computerized measures, and self-assessments of how participants feel. These tests could include numbers, letters, symbols, words, or sentences. These tests will be repeated throughout the study. If eligible to do so, participants will complete a baseline MRI scan.
A subset of participants who completed a baseline MRI scan will complete another MRI scan after approximately 26 weeks of vortioxetine or placebo and at home computerized cognitive training.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Vortioxetine plus cognitive training
Vortioxetine (10 mg) plus cognitive training 5 times weekly for 30 minutes a day
Vortioxetine 10 mg
Cognitive training program
Online training program, 30 minutes a day, 5 times a week
Placebo plus cognitive training
Placebo plus cognitive training 5 times weekly for 30 minutes a day
Cognitive training program
Online training program, 30 minutes a day, 5 times a week
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vortioxetine 10 mg
Cognitive training program
Online training program, 30 minutes a day, 5 times a week
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age-related cognitive decline as defined by (a) self-reported cognitive dysfunction that is attributed to the aging process (in response to screening questions to the participant); (b) ability to complete cognitive battery, but still scoring less than 1 standard deviation above age-matched norms at both baseline and after the two-week cognitive training lead-in.
Exclusion Criteria
* Any current psychiatric disorder
* Medical conditions that suggest shortened lifespan, such as metastatic cancer; or would prohibit safe participation in the interventions, including cardiovascular disease or musculoskeletal conditions; or with the assessments.
* Sensory impairment that would prevent participation
* IQ \< 70 as estimated by the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading
* Alcohol or substance abuse within 6 months
* Concurrent cognitive training, such as brain-training software, or other interventions expected to affect neuroplasticity
* Psychotropic medications or those with likely CNS effects (none within 4 weeks prior to study entry)
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Queen's University
OTHER
Takeda
INDUSTRY
Washington University School of Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Eric Lenze, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Washington University School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ball K, Berch DB, Helmers KF, Jobe JB, Leveck MD, Marsiske M, Morris JN, Rebok GW, Smith DM, Tennstedt SL, Unverzagt FW, Willis SL; Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly Study Group. Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002 Nov 13;288(18):2271-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.18.2271.
Bowie CR, Gupta M, Holshausen K, Jokic R, Best M, Milev R. Cognitive remediation for treatment-resistant depression: effects on cognition and functioning and the role of online homework. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2013 Aug;201(8):680-5. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31829c5030.
Kozauer N, Katz R. Regulatory innovation and drug development for early-stage Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 28;368(13):1169-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1302513. Epub 2013 Mar 13. No abstract available.
Lampit A, Hallock H, Valenzuela M. Computerized cognitive training in cognitively healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effect modifiers. PLoS Med. 2014 Nov 18;11(11):e1001756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001756. eCollection 2014 Nov.
Lenze EJ, Stevens A, Waring JD, Pham VT, Haddad R, Shimony J, Miller JP, Bowie CR. Augmenting Computerized Cognitive Training With Vortioxetine for Age-Related Cognitive Decline: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 1;177(6):548-555. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19050561. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
201509107
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.