Interrupting Prolonged Sitting With Activity

NCT ID: NCT03256188

Last Updated: 2017-08-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

500 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-08-15

Study Completion Date

2016-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study tested the feasibility of interrupting prolonged sitting with 10, 3-minute activity breaks in elementary school classrooms. Three elementary schools in Southeast Michigan (20 teachers, 500 students) participated in this study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

School environments have historically provided many opportunities for children to be physically active through comprehensive programs, including recess, intramural physical activity clubs, interscholastic sports and physical education. However, with recent cuts to public school funding and an increased emphasis on standardized test scores, schools districts across the country have reduced time allocated for structured physical activity in favor of additional academic instruction time. This is troubling as uninterrupted prolonged sitting time is associated with increased disruptive behavior, lower academic achievement and increased obesity risk in children. As such, developing low-cost, innovative physical activity interventions aimed at improving weight outcomes and cognitive function in children are warranted.

Researchers have targeted the school classroom, where students spend the majority of their time, as a potential intervention site. Classroom-based physical activity interventions have been largely successful at increasing physical activity, improving physical fitness and academic achievement among children. Yet, no intervention to date has been able to produce significant improvements in weight status, in part due to the intensity, duration and frequency of activities employed (i.e., low-to-moderate intensity; 10-30 minutes per session; 1-2 sessions per day). Preliminary evidence from our laboratory suggests intermittent activity breaks performed at a moderate-to-vigorous intensity elicits greater total daily physical activity energy expenditure without subsequent increases in food intake compared to lower intensity activities. Other researchers have confirmed greater reductions in weight and fat mass in response to higher rather than lower intensity physical activities. In addition, short bursts of activity rather than continuous movements more closely mimics children's natural activity patterns in free-living environments. Hence, incorporating intermittent activity breaks of moderate-to-vigorous intensity as an intervention component may increase the likelihood of classroom-based physical activity interventions improving weight outcomes in children.

Implementing intermittent activity breaks in a classroom will require adjustments to both teaching curricula and classroom design. Current teaching curricula promotes sedentary behaviors by requiring children to spend between 6 and 8 hours in seated academic instruction per day. Moreover, current classroom designs (i.e., size of the classroom and interior areas, type of furniture, flooring and room arrangement) optimize student learning and classroom management with little consideration given to physical activity and movement. Yet, simple adjustments to teaching curricula (i.e. coupling physical activity with teacher's existing lessons) and classroom design (e.g. using smart floor planning to restructure spaces in a classroom) can dramatically increase movement and subsequent learning within that space. In partnership with the School of Education and the Taubman College of Architecture \& Urban Planning, two traditionally non-health related fields, the overall objectives of this pilot study are to: 1) develop a classroom curriculum and floor plan that promotes movement, learning and positive behavioral outcomes; and 2) test the feasibility of implementing our classroom-based physical activity intervention (Interrupting Prolonged sitting with ACTivity or INPACT) in three elementary schools (20 classrooms) across the state of Michigan. Third thru fifth grade teachers and students from Columbia Elementary, Estabrook Elementary and Anderson Elementary will be recruited to participate in this pilot study with classroom teachers delivering the physical activity intervention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Physical Activity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active classroom

Twenty elementary school teachers implemented 10, 3-minute moderate-to-vigorous physical activity breaks (50-75% of heart rate maximum), 5 days per week in their classrooms over a 16-week period.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Active classroom

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

30 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Active classroom

30 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

InPACT classroom

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 3rd thru 6th grade students in participating InPACT classrooms

Exclusion Criteria

* N/A
Minimum Eligible Age

8 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Michigan

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rebecca Hasson

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rebecca E Hasson, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Michigan

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Childhood Disparities Research Laboratory

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HUM00117049

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Effects of an Active Break Program at Primary School
NCT05403996 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Sustaining Quality Physical Education for Healthy Kids
NCT07227935 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
Remote Exercise Program for Rural Men
NCT07224217 RECRUITING NA