Low Back Pain: Unveiling the Contribution of Motor Control Adaption Using Biomechanical Modeling and Neuroimaging

NCT ID: NCT03255616

Last Updated: 2023-01-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-04-01

Study Completion Date

2023-01-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This project aims to reveal the potential sensorimotor reorganization of sensory input in low back pain patients and its association with different motor control strategies in LBP.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a major health issue. Treatment of chronic LBP is still a major challenge due to a lack of pathophysiological understanding. Thus, understanding LBP pathophysiology is a research priority. Adaptions of motor control likely play a significant role in chronic or recurrent LBP because motor control is crucial for spine posture, stability and movement. Different motor adaption strategies exist across individuals with LBP and two phenotypes representing the opposite ends of a spectrum have been suggested; i.e. "tight" control and "loose" control over trunk movement. The former would be associated with reduced trunk motor variability, the later with increased trunk motor variability. This conceptual framework is very useful to explain maintenance and aggravating of LBP because motor control adaptations are expected to have long-term consequences, such as increased spinal tissue loading, associated with degeneration of intervertebral discs and other tissues. Several knowledge gaps need to be addressed to test the validity of this framework: 1) Do loose/tight control phenotypes indeed exist and/or do other motor control adaption strategies exist? 2) Is reduced/altered paraspinal proprioceptive input associated with LBP related to neuroplastic cortical changes, thereby affecting the organizational structure in sensorimotor cortices and top-down trunk motor control? 3) Do psychological factors influence the organizational structure in sensorimotor cortices and motor control strategies? To address these knowledge gaps, the objectives of the current project are: I) To establish motor control phenotypes in LBP. Proprioceptive weighting and biomechanical assessment of dynamic movement tasks, including subject-specific spine kinematic variability and its relationship to pain duration, negative pain-related cognitions, segmental loadings and paraspinal muscle forces, will be performed. II) To test whether cortical proprioceptive maps differ between healthy subjects and patients with LBP. Brain activation in response to thoracolumbar vibrotactile stimulation will be interrogated using functional magnetic resonance imaging data and univariate and multivariate analysis based on machine learning. III) To test whether proprioceptive maps demonstrate a relationship to spine kinematic patterns, pain duration and negative pain-related cognitions in LBP patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Healthy subjects

Spine kinematics assessment during daily activities and brain responses to thoracolumbar mechanical and vibrotactile stimulation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

mechanical stimulation

Intervention Type OTHER

mechanical non-painful low- and high pressure stimuli to thoracolumbar segments of healthy subjects and low back pain patients

vibrotactile stimulation

Intervention Type OTHER

non-painful vibrotactile stimulation within a frequency range between 20-150Hz to thoracolumbar segments of healthy subjects and low back pain patients

Low back pain patients

Spine kinematics assessment during daily activities and brain responses to thoracolumbar mechanical and vibrotactile stimulation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

mechanical stimulation

Intervention Type OTHER

mechanical non-painful low- and high pressure stimuli to thoracolumbar segments of healthy subjects and low back pain patients

vibrotactile stimulation

Intervention Type OTHER

non-painful vibrotactile stimulation within a frequency range between 20-150Hz to thoracolumbar segments of healthy subjects and low back pain patients

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

mechanical stimulation

mechanical non-painful low- and high pressure stimuli to thoracolumbar segments of healthy subjects and low back pain patients

Intervention Type OTHER

vibrotactile stimulation

non-painful vibrotactile stimulation within a frequency range between 20-150Hz to thoracolumbar segments of healthy subjects and low back pain patients

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged between 18 and 60
* Written informed consent after being informed


* Aged between 18 and 60
* Low back pain for more than 1 week

Exclusion Criteria

* Consumption of alcohol, drugs, analgesics within the last 24 h
* Pregnancy
* acute and/or low recurrent back pain within the last 3 months
* Prior spine surgery
* Other chronic pain condition
* history of psychiatric or neurological disorders
* MR-contraindications
* Body mass index (BMI) \> 30 kg/m2


* Consumption of alcohol, drugs, analgesics within the last 24 h
* Pregnancy
* Specific causes for the back pain (ruled out by the clinician)
* Prior spine surgery
* History of psychiatric or neurological disorders
* MR-contraindications
* Body mass index (BMI) \> 30 kg/m2
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Psychiatric University Hospital, Zurich

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bern University of Applied Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Balgrist University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Michael Meier

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Meier, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Balgrist University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Balgrist University Hospital

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Project_X

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Spinal Kinematics Variability
NCT03507296 COMPLETED