Motor Learning for the Lumbar Spine Using Sensor-based Postural Feedback: a Randomized Controlled Trial

NCT ID: NCT02773160

Last Updated: 2016-05-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-04-30

Study Completion Date

2017-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A large subgroup of patients with chronic non-specific low back pain have motor control impairments. During motor control exercises, different forms of external feedback can be used to support training. This randomized controlled trial will investigate the effectiveness of different forms of external feedback during the learning phase of a motor control task for the lumbar spine in healthy subjects and patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP). Both healthy subjects and patients with CNSLBP will be randomized into three groups: one group will receive feedback from motion sensors, one group from a mirror and one group will receive no feedback (control group). A single session intervention with measurements at baseline and immediately post-intervention will be used.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sensor-based postural feedback

Subjects will receive visual feedback on a computer screen while practicing the motor control task. The feedback is based on information from from motion sensors that mointor the movements of the lumbar spine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sensor-based postural feedback

Intervention Type OTHER

Motion tracking sensors will provide feedback to subjects during the learning phase of a motor control task

Mirror Feedback

Subjects will receive feedback from a mirror while practicing the motor control task

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mirror feedback

Intervention Type OTHER

Subjects will receive feedback from a mirror during the learning phase of a motor control task

control group

Subjects will receive no feedback while practicing the motor control task

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Control group

Intervention Type OTHER

Subjects will receive no feedback during the learning phase of a motor control task

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sensor-based postural feedback

Motion tracking sensors will provide feedback to subjects during the learning phase of a motor control task

Intervention Type OTHER

Mirror feedback

Subjects will receive feedback from a mirror during the learning phase of a motor control task

Intervention Type OTHER

Control group

Subjects will receive no feedback during the learning phase of a motor control task

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Chronic non-specific low back pain
* Age 18-65
* Able to understand Dutch

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects that received lumbar stabilization exercises in the past year
* Spinal surgery in the past
* Pregnancy
* Serious underlying pathologies (e.g. multiple sclerosis, tumors,…)
* Signs or symptoms of nerve root involvement
* Any physical condition at the moment of testing that can interfere with activities of daily living (e.g. serious knee pain)
* Known skin-allergy for tape
* BMI \> 30kg/m²
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Jessa Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hasselt University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Annick Timmermans

prof. dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Annick Timmermans, prof. dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hasselt University

Enzo Olivieri, dr.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Jessa Ziekenhuis, Hasselt, Belgium

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universiteit Hasselt

Diepenbeek, , Belgium

Site Status RECRUITING

Jessa Ziekenhuis

Hasselt, , Belgium

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Thomas Matheve, drs.

Role: CONTACT

Annick Timmermans, prof. dr.

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

thomas Matheve, drs.

Role: primary

Thomas Matheve, drs.

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Matheve T, Timmermans A, Danneels L, De Baets L. Task-Specific Perceived Harmfulness Predicts Protective Movement Behaviour in Chronic Low Back Pain. J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 25;13(17):5025. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175025.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39274238 (View on PubMed)

Matheve T, Brumagne S, Demoulin C, Timmermans A. Sensor-based postural feedback is more effective than conventional feedback to improve lumbopelvic movement control in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Sep 26;15(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0423-6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30253807 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AcuteLearningEffects

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.