Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
329 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2009-01-01
2017-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
OBJECTIVES The cohort study aimed to highlight the effect of HIIT on long-term survivals of HF patients.
METHODS 329 HF patients, enrolled between 2009 and 2016, received multidisciplinary disease management program (MDP). They had cardiopulmonary exercise test for peak exercise capacity (VO2peak), echocardiographic examination for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), and LV end-systolic diameter (LVESD), b-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and quality of life questionnaire. HF patients with LVEF≤ 40% (HFrEF) and HF patients with LVEF\> 40% (HFpEF) underwent≥ 36 times of HIIT. HFrEF and HFpEF patients were classified as the MDP group. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) was used to estimate the interaction between time and VO2peak, LVEF, LVEDD, LVESD, and BNP during the follow-up. Survival analysis was conducted to assess effects of HIIT on the long-term survival of HF during at end of the study.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
HIIT Effects on Long-term Survival in Heart Failure Patients
NCT05487716
High Intensity Interval Training in Chronic Heart Failure
NCT05659420
High Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate Continuous Training in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
NCT02916225
High-Intensity Interval Training Recuperates Capacity of Endogenous Thrombin Generation in Patients With Heart Failure
NCT04033523
High Intensity Interval Training vs Moderate Intensity and Continuous Training in Chronic Heart Failure
NCT03603743
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
HIIT subjects in HFrEF patients
heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) received at least 36 times of high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
High-intensity interval training
Patients warmed up for 3 min at 30% of peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak). Five 3-minute intervals at 80% of VO2peak and each interval was separated by 3-minute exercise at 40% of VO2peak. The exercise session was terminated by 3-minute cool-down at 30% of VO2peak. All subjects used a EKG and BP monitors as indicators of the assigned exercise intensity. Borg 6-to-20 scale was used to assess the rate of perceived exertion during and after each exercise session. Patients suffering unstable hemodynamic, ischemic cardiac symptoms/signs, and uncontrolled arrhythmia were instructed to immediately terminate exercise training.
MDP subjects in HFrEF patients
heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) received only multidisciplinary disease management program (MDP) and underwent less than 36 times of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) or no exercise training
High-intensity interval training
Patients warmed up for 3 min at 30% of peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak). Five 3-minute intervals at 80% of VO2peak and each interval was separated by 3-minute exercise at 40% of VO2peak. The exercise session was terminated by 3-minute cool-down at 30% of VO2peak. All subjects used a EKG and BP monitors as indicators of the assigned exercise intensity. Borg 6-to-20 scale was used to assess the rate of perceived exertion during and after each exercise session. Patients suffering unstable hemodynamic, ischemic cardiac symptoms/signs, and uncontrolled arrhythmia were instructed to immediately terminate exercise training.
HIIT subjects in HFpEF patients
heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) received at least 36 times of high-intensity interval training (HIIT)
High-intensity interval training
Patients warmed up for 3 min at 30% of peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak). Five 3-minute intervals at 80% of VO2peak and each interval was separated by 3-minute exercise at 40% of VO2peak. The exercise session was terminated by 3-minute cool-down at 30% of VO2peak. All subjects used a EKG and BP monitors as indicators of the assigned exercise intensity. Borg 6-to-20 scale was used to assess the rate of perceived exertion during and after each exercise session. Patients suffering unstable hemodynamic, ischemic cardiac symptoms/signs, and uncontrolled arrhythmia were instructed to immediately terminate exercise training.
MDP subjects in HFpEF patients
heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) received only multidisciplinary disease management program (MDP) and underwent less than 36 times of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) or no exercise training
High-intensity interval training
Patients warmed up for 3 min at 30% of peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak). Five 3-minute intervals at 80% of VO2peak and each interval was separated by 3-minute exercise at 40% of VO2peak. The exercise session was terminated by 3-minute cool-down at 30% of VO2peak. All subjects used a EKG and BP monitors as indicators of the assigned exercise intensity. Borg 6-to-20 scale was used to assess the rate of perceived exertion during and after each exercise session. Patients suffering unstable hemodynamic, ischemic cardiac symptoms/signs, and uncontrolled arrhythmia were instructed to immediately terminate exercise training.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
High-intensity interval training
Patients warmed up for 3 min at 30% of peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak). Five 3-minute intervals at 80% of VO2peak and each interval was separated by 3-minute exercise at 40% of VO2peak. The exercise session was terminated by 3-minute cool-down at 30% of VO2peak. All subjects used a EKG and BP monitors as indicators of the assigned exercise intensity. Borg 6-to-20 scale was used to assess the rate of perceived exertion during and after each exercise session. Patients suffering unstable hemodynamic, ischemic cardiac symptoms/signs, and uncontrolled arrhythmia were instructed to immediately terminate exercise training.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
20 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
OTHER_GOV
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Chih-Chin Hsu, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dept. of PM&R, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fu TC, Wang CH, Lin PS, Hsu CC, Cherng WJ, Huang SC, Liu MH, Chiang CL, Wang JS. Aerobic interval training improves oxygen uptake efficiency by enhancing cerebral and muscular hemodynamics in patients with heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Jul 15;167(1):41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.11.086. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
Lee MF, Chen WS, Fu TC, Liu MH, Wang JS, Hsu CC, Huang YY, Cherng WJ, Wang CH. Non-invasive cardiac index monitoring during cardiopulmonary functional testing provides additional prognostic value in patients after acute heart failure. Int Heart J. 2012;53(6):364-9. doi: 10.1536/ihj.53.364.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
201601068B0
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.