Human-derived Human Milk Fortifiers (H2MF), Gut Microbiota and Oxidative Stress in Premature Infants

NCT ID: NCT03214822

Last Updated: 2019-09-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-08-01

Study Completion Date

2019-07-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a randomized controlled trial of a human-derived human milk fortifier (H2MF) vs standard bovine-derived human milk fortifier (HMF) evaluating fecal microbiota and fecal and urinary biomarkers of oxidative stress in premature infants.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

While breast milk provides complete nutrition for full term infants, supplementation with human milk fortifiers (HMF) is required to achieve optimal weight gain in very low birthweight (VLBW) preterm neonates. Traditionally, HMF have been derived from bovine milk. Bovine-based infant formula has been shown to cause dysbiosis of the infant gut microbiome (Azad et al 2013) and increased oxidative stress in preterm neonates (Friel et al 2011). Microbiome dysbiosis and oxidative stress have been implicated in numerous inflammatory conditions, including both acute (eg. necrotizing enterocolitis, NEC) and long-term (eg. asthma, metabolic syndrome) sequela of preterm birth (Torrazza et al 2013, Goulet et al 2015, Flora et al 2007, Perrone et al 2014). Recent studies show that new human-derived HMF (H2MF) are superior to standard bovine HMF for nourishing VLBW preterm infants and preventing NEC (Sullivan et al 2010, Cristofalo et al 2013). However, the biological basis for these clinical benefits is unknown, which limits our ability to inform and improve feeding strategies for VLBW preterm infants. This will be the first study to evaluate the impact of H2MF on gut microbiota and oxidative stress in preterm infants.

Specific Objectives:

1. To evaluate the effect of H2MF vs. HMF on gut microbiota composition in premature infants born \<1250 gr between 26 and 30 weeks of gestational age.
2. To evaluate the effect of H2MF vs. HMF on fecal and urinary biomarkers of oxidative stress in premature infants born \<1250 gr between 26 and 30 weeks of gestational age.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Very Low Birth Weight Baby Premature Birth Microbial Colonization Oxidative Stress

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Using a randomized, controlled, un-blinded parallel design we will enroll 30 VLBW premature neonates (birth weight \< 1250 grams, gestational age 26+0 to 30+0 weeks) from the NICU at the Health Sciences Centre Children's Hospital in Winnipeg, MB, Canada. Currently, H2MF is not routinely used in this population at this centre.
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors
Masking of care providers is not feasible since the procedures of preparation for HMF and H2MF are different. Outcome assessors (personnel analyzing microbiome profiles and oxidative stress biomarkers) will be masked.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

HMF (standard of care)

The HMF "Control Group" will receive the current standard feeding protocol of human milk fortified with bovine (cow) human milk fortifier (HMF)

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

H2MF

The H2MF "Intervention Group" will receive identical treatment with human-derived human milk fortifier (H2MF) replacing standard bovine HMF until the baby reaches an adjusted gestation age of 33 weeks; followed by a 5 day ween to standard HMF according to the manufacturer's recommendation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

H2MF

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

As described in the Experimental Arm description.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

H2MF

As described in the Experimental Arm description.

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female infant with birth weight \<1250 grams
* Gestational age between 26+0 to 30+0 weeks at birth
* Able to adhere to feeding protocol
* Parenteral nutrition must be started by day of life 2
* Enteral feeding \>80 ml/kg/d should be reached by day of life 14
* Subject's parent(s)/legal guardian(s) has provided signed and dated informed consent and authorization to use protected health information, as required by national and local regulations.
* In the investigator's opinion, the subject's parent(s)/legal guardian(s) understands and is able to comply with protocol requirements, instructions, and protocol-stated restrictions, and is likely to complete the study as planned.

Exclusion Criteria

* Gestational age \> 30+0 weeks at birth (to guarantee a minimum of 3 weeks H2MF treatment, since fortification ends at 33+0 AGA)
* Gestational age \< 26+0 weeks at birth (to minimize baseline heterogeneity, since gestational age influences gut microbiota)
* Received antibiotics on the first day of specimen collection (to minimize baseline heterogeneity, since antibiotics influence gut microbiota) Note: all infants are expected to receive up to 48 hr antibiotic prophylaxis at birth according to standard NICU protocol; this criterion will exclude infants receiving extended courses of antibiotics.
* Received probiotics at any time (to minimize baseline heterogeneity, since probiotics influence gut microbiota)
* Unlikely to survive the study period
* Presence of clinically significant congenital heart disease or other major congenital malformation
* Presence prior to enrollment of intestinal perforation or stage 2 necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) prior to tolerating fortified feeds
Maximum Eligible Age

7 Days

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Manitoba Developmental Origins of Chronic Diseases in Children Network (DEVOTION)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Prolacta Bioscience

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's Hospital Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Manitoba

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Meghan Azad

Prinicpal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Meghan Azad, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Manitoba

Geert T'Jong

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Manitoba

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Health Sciences Centre

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Azad MB, Konya T, Maughan H, Guttman DS, Field CJ, Chari RS, Sears MR, Becker AB, Scott JA, Kozyrskyj AL; CHILD Study Investigators. Gut microbiota of healthy Canadian infants: profiles by mode of delivery and infant diet at 4 months. CMAJ. 2013 Mar 19;185(5):385-94. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.121189. Epub 2013 Feb 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23401405 (View on PubMed)

Friel JK, Diehl-Jones B, Cockell KA, Chiu A, Rabanni R, Davies SS, Roberts LJ 2nd. Evidence of oxidative stress in relation to feeding type during early life in premature infants. Pediatr Res. 2011 Feb;69(2):160-4. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3182042a07.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21045751 (View on PubMed)

Torrazza RM, Ukhanova M, Wang X, Sharma R, Hudak ML, Neu J, Mai V. Intestinal microbial ecology and environmental factors affecting necrotizing enterocolitis. PLoS One. 2013 Dec 30;8(12):e83304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083304. eCollection 2013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24386174 (View on PubMed)

Goulet O. Potential role of the intestinal microbiota in programming health and disease. Nutr Rev. 2015 Aug;73 Suppl 1:32-40. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuv039.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26175488 (View on PubMed)

Flora SJ. Role of free radicals and antioxidants in health and disease. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2007 Apr 15;53(1):1-2. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17535753 (View on PubMed)

Perrone S, Tataranno ML, Santacroce A, Negro S, Buonocore G. The role of oxidative stress on necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Curr Pediatr Rev. 2014;10(3):202-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25088341 (View on PubMed)

Sullivan S, Schanler RJ, Kim JH, Patel AL, Trawoger R, Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U, Chan GM, Blanco CL, Abrams S, Cotten CM, Laroia N, Ehrenkranz RA, Dudell G, Cristofalo EA, Meier P, Lee ML, Rechtman DJ, Lucas A. An exclusively human milk-based diet is associated with a lower rate of necrotizing enterocolitis than a diet of human milk and bovine milk-based products. J Pediatr. 2010 Apr;156(4):562-7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.10.040. Epub 2009 Dec 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20036378 (View on PubMed)

Cristofalo EA, Schanler RJ, Blanco CL, Sullivan S, Trawoeger R, Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U, Dudell G, Rechtman DJ, Lee ML, Lucas A, Abrams S. Randomized trial of exclusive human milk versus preterm formula diets in extremely premature infants. J Pediatr. 2013 Dec;163(6):1592-1595.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.07.011. Epub 2013 Aug 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23968744 (View on PubMed)

Kumbhare SV, Jones WD, Fast S, Bonner C, Jong G', Van Domselaar G, Graham M, Narvey M, Azad MB. Source of human milk (mother or donor) is more important than fortifier type (human or bovine) in shaping the preterm infant microbiome. Cell Rep Med. 2022 Sep 20;3(9):100712. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100712. Epub 2022 Aug 26.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36029771 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H2MF Study

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Preterm Infants Fed a Human Milk Fortifier
NCT05551975 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
HMF Preterm Case Studies
NCT05057390 COMPLETED NA