Randomized Study of Human-Milk Based Nutrition Versus Formula in Premature Infants

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

260 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-07-31

Study Completion Date

2008-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether very low birth weight infants (less than or equal to 1250g or about 2 3/4 pounds) born prematurely fed a diet of only human milk and human milk-derived nutrition have better health outcomes than babies fed at least some formula (made from cow's milk)or formula-derived nutrition.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Human Milk-derived Fortification in Preterm Infants

NCT05228847

Postnatal Growth Restriction Necrotizing Enterocolitis

UNKNOWN NA

Enrichment of Human Milk With Human and Bovine Milk-based Fortifiers for Very Preterm Infants: a Meta-analysis

NCT06870318

Human Milk Fortification Very Low Birth Weight Baby Human Milk Nutrition +6 more

COMPLETED

Bovine vs. Human Milk-Based Fortifier Study

NCT02137473

Very Low Birth Weight Infant (<1250g)

COMPLETED NA

Effect of Extensively Hydrolyzed Liquid Human Milk Fortifier on Growth and Tolerance in Moderately Premature Infants

NCT02632266

Complication of Prematurity

COMPLETED PHASE4

Feeding Study in Premature Infants

NCT00681018

Premature Infants

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The goal of this study is to evaluate the short-term effect (up to 90 days of life) of purely human-based nutrition using mother's own milk (when available), donor milk preparations and a human-based fortifier (Prolact+4) as needed when compared with mother's own milk supplemented with pre-term formula and using a bovine-based HMF (as needed for fortification of mother's own milk), i.e. "Study Group 1"; or, when mother's milk is not available, comparing the use of donor milk (plus human milk based fortification) with pre-term/term formula, i.e. "Study Group 2". In both instances the comparison will be based on the primary endpoint of days of TPN, and on parameters such as time to full enteral feeding (approximately 150-160 mL/kg/day), amount of IV fluid support, culture-proven sepsis, NEC, death, growth and short-term development, cultured-proven sepsis and incidence of feeding intolerance in either a 2-arm (human nutrition versus bovine nutrition: "Study Group 2") or 3-arm randomized design (human fortifier given when feedings reach 40 mL/kg/day, human fortifier given when feedings reach 100 mL/kg/day, and bovine-based HMF given when feedings reach 100 mL/kg/day \[or pre-term formula if mother's milk is not available\]: "Study Group 1").

Statistically, the study will attempt to evaluate a null hypothesis of equivalent results with respect to these parameters between either the three types of fortifications in "Study Group 1" or the two types of overall nutrition in "Study Group 2", as compared with an alternative of some inequality between the groups, i.e. letting μ be the mean number of days of TPN any of the study arms, then for "Study Group 1 the hypotheses may be written as:

H0: μ control = μ human 40 = μhuman 100 and HA: At least two of μ control, μ human 40, and μhuman 100 are not equal, where "control" is the bovine-based HMF group, "human 40" is the human fortifier group starting at 40 mL/kg/day (arm 2) and "human 100" is the human fortifier group starting at 100 mL/kg/day (arm 1). For "Study Group 2", the competing hypotheses are: H0: μ formula = μ human and HA: μ formula ≠ μ human , where "formula" is the pre-term/term formula group and "human" is the human-based (donor milk/human-based fortifier) group.

In addition, data will be collected on overall survival and length of stay in the NICU. Any baby that does not complete the full study period will be right-censored in this regard for the purposes of data evaluation. For centers that obtain long-term follow up (18-24 months) on their patients, data on developmental outcomes will be evaluated as available.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infant, Very Low Birth Weight

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1, arm 1

Human breast milk + Prolact20/Neo20 (as needed) + Prolact+4 (initiated when nutrition volume reaches 100 mL/kg/day, where Prolact20/Neo 20 are donor human milk formulations at 20 cal/oz, Prolact+4 is a human-milk derived human milk fortified designed to add 4 cal/oz to 20 cal/oz human breast milk.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL